#26-BT-0054, State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank

[Robin Bank]

Defendant Name: Robin Bank
Defendant Phone: 2508323
(( Defendant Discord: is.ronin))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC+2 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: SD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 04/JUN/2026 8PM
Charge(s):

• Failure to identify

Narrative:

I was wrongfully charged

---

I, Robin Bank, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank
#26-BT-0054

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 5th day of June, 2026.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank
#26-BT-0054

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 5th day of June, 2026.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank
#26-BT-0054

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 9th day of July, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an additional week to collect evidence, additionally we would like to apologize for the delay on this continuance, I was on LOA and it appears this continuance was not submitted.

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank
#26-BT-0054

A decision was reached in the above case on the 11th day of July, 2026.

The Court will accept the Motion for Continuance, which concludes on the 16th of July, 2026. No further extension of the discovery deadline will be granted.


So Ordered,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Robin Bank]

The Defendant respectfully moves the Court to reconsider its Order granting the State's Motion for Continuance.

The Defendant was not afforded an opportunity to respond to the State's Motion for Continuance before the Court issued its ruling. Respectfully, the Defendant submits that consideration of both parties' arguments is fundamental to ensuring a fair adjudication of contested motions.

Had the Defendant been permitted to respond, the Defendant would have argued that the State has already had approximately thirty (30) days to investigate and prepare this straightforward Failure to Identify matter. The prosecution's stated justification; that the assigned prosecutor was on Leave of Absence and that the continuance was not timely submitted; is an internal administrative matter within the State's control and does not constitute good cause to delay the Defendant's right to a timely resolution.

While the Defendant appreciates the Court's limitation that no further extension of the discovery deadline will be granted, the Defendant respectfully submits that the burden of the State's internal staffing or scheduling issues should not be borne by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant respectfully requests that the Court reconsider its Order, vacate the continuance, and proceed with the matter as originally scheduled.

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  While the Court appreciates the comments from the Defendant, the Court will not be rescinding the last decision.
  
  The Court affords all parties some leeway. The Prosecution was on an approved leave of absence, and as such, the Court will accept the impact that had on the Prosecution, given the breadth of cases they are handling.
  
  Additionally, the latest press release from the Judicial Branch highlights the following:

  The prosecution will generally be limited to one continuance of up to seven days for discovery-related matters. Additional continuances will only be granted in extenuating circumstances, such as an approved leave of absence or other unforeseen circumstances beyond the party's control ((OOC Reasons)).

  This decision fits squarely within these guidelines. The discovery window for your case remained at thirty days, given the original order for Discovery was prior to this press release.
  
  [Press Release #64] Discovery Timeline Changes
  
  The Court has set a limit on the time extension, so it will revisit the matter on the stated date if no discovery is submitted by that time.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank
#26-BT-0054

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 16th day of July, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest report

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Robin Bank
    Telephone Number: 2508323
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  • Vehicle A: Pink Elegy Retro Custom, LP RUNN, VIN H2G4UHZAZCSFYA000, RO Hope Linde

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: April Harlowe
    Badge Number: 9344
    Callsign: D14

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2026-06-04
    Deputies Involved: April Harlowe, Clay Thompson
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • I pulled over a Pink Elegy Retro Custom being driven by Hope Linde, with Mr Bank in the passenger seat. I requested both of them to identify themselves so I can address them both properly, and so I can know who I am speaking with. Hope complied, however Mr Bank refused to identify himself, quoting that he knows the law and that he doesn't need to identify himself. I attempted to explain to him that as a Deputy I have the right to identify anyone I am detaining, and all people in a vehicle during a traffic stop are legally detained. He refused to listen to this explanation, exited the vehicle and demanded he be arrested for Failure to Identify as he refuses to show his ID.
      Clay Thompson then placed him in cuffs, read him his rights, and placed him in the back of my cruiser while I handed Ms Linde a 1st Degree Speeding Citation and let her go on her way. Mr Bank was then searched, identified, and taken to Sandy Station where he served 20 months for Failure to Identify.

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: N/A

  
  
  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  
  

  ---

  

• Exhibit #2 Witness statement Detective Harlow

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: 04/JUN/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: April Harlowe
    Date of Birth: 10/MAY/1995
    Phone Number: 4961177
    Occupation: Detective - Los Santos Sheriffs Department

  Witness Statement

  • On June 4th 2026, I conducted a traffic stop on a pink Elegy Retro Custom after observing a traffic offence. The vehicle was occupied by the driver, Hope Linde, and a passenger, later identified as Mr Bank.
    
    As part of the stop, I requested identification from both occupants so I could properly identify everyone involved in the detention and address them appropriately throughout the interaction. Ms Linde complied with my request without issue. Mr Bank, however, refused to identify himself, stating that he was familiar with the law and was under no obligation to provide identification.
    
    I explained to Mr Bank that, during a lawful traffic stop, the occupants of the vehicle are considered lawfully detained, and that I was entitled to establish the identity of individuals involved in that detention. Despite this explanation, Mr Bank continued to refuse to provide any identifying information. He then voluntarily exited the vehicle and repeatedly stated that he wished to be arrested rather than identify himself.
    
    After Mr Bank made it clear that he would not comply with the lawful request for identification, Deputy Clay Thompson placed him under arrest for Failure to Identify. He was searched prior to arrest, his identity was established, and he was transported to Sandy Shores Sheriff's Station for processing. Once the driver had been issued the appropriate citation for the original traffic offence, she was released from the scene without further incident.
    
    Throughout the encounter, Mr Bank was given multiple opportunities to comply before enforcement action was taken, but he remained unwilling to identify himself.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, April Harlowe, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    April Harlowe
    Detective
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 09/JUL/2026

  

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]