#26-BT-0035, State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

[Becks Hirano]

Defendant Name: Becks Hirano
Defendant Phone: 402-2305
(( Defendant Discord: xKittyyyxx ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self Representation

Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 05/Apr/2026 02:00
Charge(s):

• VF01 - Evading an Officer
• GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
• SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
• WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm

Narrative:
I believe these charges were placed unlawfully.

---

I, Becks Hirano, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 10th day of April, 2026.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 10th day of April, 2026.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 10th day of May, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an additional week in order to receive evidence from the arresting department.

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Beck Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A decision was reached in the above case on the 11th day of May, 2026.

Due to the short nature of the request, the court will grant an extension through the 17th of May, 2026.


So Ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 17th day of May, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest report

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department WARRANT REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • Full Name: Becks Hirano
      Phone Number: 4022305
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Detective II Mick Wegman
      • Police Detective III Jordan Blix
      • Police Captain III George Hill
      • Police Officer III Adrianna Hill
      Charges:
      • SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
      • WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to validate the justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • Adriana Hill was being pursued by a Blue LC which she requested backup to have it pulled over, I responded after he pulled over the then got out and pointed a gun at myself which she demanded me to call for SD informing it was a Code 1.
        
        She then demanded that she was to find out who took her belongings, which SD arrived and took over negotiations. Frank Peters stated "Becks Hirano" where she confirmed even stating that he said her full name. She continued to keep me hostage later until SD arrived with the headphones from DOC then took Frank Peters hostage until he put her headphones on herself, she then got in her vehicle taking off.
      Method of Identification
      • VISUAL IDENTIFICATIOn
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Illegal evidence must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal evidence are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Evidence:
        
        
        Photograph of possessions in evidence locker (if applicable)
  
  Rowin Lawson
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  451-9939 - [email protected]

[Becks Hirano]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION TO SUPPRESS

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Defendant
#26-BT-0035

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 18th of May 2026

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest Report
  Requested Evidence to Suppress:

  Exhibit #1 Arrest report

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department WARRANT REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • Full Name: Becks Hirano
      Phone Number: 4022305
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Detective II Mick Wegman
      • Police Detective III Jordan Blix
      • Police Captain III George Hill
      • Police Officer III Adrianna Hill
      Charges:
      • SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
      • WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to validate the justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • Adriana Hill was being pursued by a Blue LC which she requested backup to have it pulled over, I responded after he pulled over the then got out and pointed a gun at myself which she demanded me to call for SD informing it was a Code 1.
        
        She then demanded that she was to find out who took her belongings, which SD arrived and took over negotiations. Frank Peters stated "Becks Hirano" where she confirmed even stating that he said her full name. She continued to keep me hostage later until SD arrived with the headphones from DOC then took Frank Peters hostage until he put her headphones on herself, she then got in her vehicle taking off.
      Method of Identification
      • VISUAL IDENTIFICATIOn
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Illegal evidence must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal evidence are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Evidence:
        
        
        Photograph of possessions in evidence locker (if applicable)

  • Detailed Reasoning: I request that all information highlighted in yellow be suppressed. There are multiple inconsistencies throughout the arrest report that contradict themselves.
    
    The arrest report contains a material inconsistency that undermines its reliability and credibility. In the statement, the reporting officer writes: “he pulled over then got out and pointed a gun at myself which she demanded me to call for SD informing it was a Code 1.” The report first identifies the alleged actor as “he,” then later refers to the same individual as “she” without clarification. Because the statement fails to consistently identify the individual allegedly involved in the conduct at issue, it is ambiguous on its face and creates uncertainty as to who actually performed the alleged acts. This inconsistency calls into question the accuracy of the officer’s observations, recollection, and documentation.
    
    The report contains an additional inconsistency regarding the identification of the alleged suspect. The report states: “Frank Peters stated ‘Becks Hirano’ where she confirmed even stating that he said her full name.” However, the accompanying notation lists the “Method of Identification” as “VISUAL IDENTIFICATION.”
    
    These statements are directly contradictory, Law enforcement cannot simultaneously claim the identification was made by hearing a person state a name while officially documenting the method as purely “visual identification” without explaining the discrepancy within the report itself.

Becks Hirano

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A decision was reached in the above case on the 24th day of May, 2026.

The Court has reviewed the defense's Motion to Suppress based on the arguments of contradiction indicated in the first statement, a "he v. she," and in the method of identification used, which is implied as verbal rather than visual. The Court considers the weight of the suppression against the long-held precedent that arrest and inherent warrant reports are exempt from what the defense argues, which is more in line with that of a hearsay objection. Therefore, the Court rules that these objections are best left to trial and do not rise to the level of a suppression. The Motion to Suppress is denied.


So Ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 24th day of May, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

[Becks Hirano]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
  
  Defense has filed availability.
  
  Becks Hirano.

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF TRIAL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A trial date was set on the above case on the 3rd day of June, 2026.

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 17:00 on 7th day of June, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The above court date has been canceled due to unforeseen circumstances. A new trial date will be set shortly.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF TRIAL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A trial date was set on the above case on the 9th day of June, 2026.

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 21:00 on 15th day of June, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]