#26-BT-0035, State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

Post Reply
Becks Hirano
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 May 2022, 16:46
ECRP Forum Name: BecksLeKitty
Discord:

#26-BT-0035, State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

Post by Becks Hirano »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Becks Hirano
Defendant Phone: 402-2305
(( Defendant Discord: xKittyyyxx ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self Representation
Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 05/Apr/2026 02:00
Charge(s):
  • VF01 - Evading an Officer
  • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
  • SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
  • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
Narrative:
I believe these charges were placed unlawfully.


I, Becks Hirano, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Image

Image
Online
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 10th day of April, 2026.


The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,

Image
Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]
Image
Image
Online
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 10th day of April, 2026.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,

Image
Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Rowin Lawson
Judicial Branch
Posts: 726
Joined: 14 Jan 2024, 19:03
ECRP Forum Name: akcoffeeman
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #26-BT-0035, State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

Post by Rowin Lawson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 10th day of May, 2026.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

  • Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an additional week in order to receive evidence from the arresting department.


Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 257
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0035, State of San Andreas v. Becks Hirano

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Beck Hirano
#26-BT-0035

A decision was reached in the above case on the 11th day of May, 2026.


Due to the short nature of the request, the court will grant an extension through the 17th of May, 2026.


So Ordered,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
Post Reply

Return to “SAJB - Criminal Court”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest