#25-BT-0110 State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana

[Alejandro Montana]

Defendant Name: Alejandro Montana
Defendant Phone: 389-4140
(( Defendant Discord: mrrobot3))
(( Defendant Timezone: EST))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation, Private Defense Attorney, Public Defender

Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 30/07/2025
Charge(s):

• WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Gov. Employee (Felony $4500)
• GM14 - Obstruction of Justice (Misdemeanor $1000)

Narrative:
I was wrongfully arrested.

---

I, Alejandro Montana, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 30th day of July, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana
#25-BT-0110

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 30th day of July, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana
#25-BT-0110

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 18th of August, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Alejandro Montana, 30/JUL/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Elijah allen
      Callsign: 3-G-14
      
      Date of Arrest: 30/JUL/2025
      Officers Involved:
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      Detective Elijah Allen was on a scene to arrest an individual alongside SD where Alejandro pulled up and started to start calling everyone name and distracting us from arresting the suspect. Detective Allen went back to his car where Alejandro tackled me and stabbed me multiple times with his knife before getting injured with the assistance of Clay Thompson

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Alejandro Montana
      Phone Number: -REDACTED-
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Gov. Employee
      • GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Detective Elijah Allen

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 30/JUL/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Elijah Allen
    Date of Birth: 11/JAN/1999
    Phone Number: 3514274
    Occupation: Detective I, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • As stated in the arrest report, the suspect for no apparent reason started causing chaos and started to interfere with the scene by swearing at peace officers. After that The suspect began to tackle me which he took out his knife and stabbed me multiple times before being neutralized. The arrest is pretty forward and the suspect has committed a crime, I don't know what can he appeal. Bodycam footage also shows the suspect stabbing the detective and interfering with the scene.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Elijah Allen, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Elijah Allen
    Detective I
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 1/AUG/2025

  

• Exhibit #3: Bodycam footage - Police Detective Elijah Allen, 30/JUL/2025

  * The bodycam would show Detective allen on a scene with multiple SD officers one of them being Clay Thompson. Alejandro approached the scene and started to call everyone name before detective allen went back to his car and alejandro was still following him and calling him names and detective allen responded back which angered him. Alejandro Tackled detective allen which then later used his knife to stab him multiple times before detective allen escaped and shot him multiple times. Alejandro tackled him again and stabbed him once more before Clay Thompson neutralized the man.
  ((Proof of RP))

• Exhibit #4: Witness statement - Staff Sergeant Clay Thompson

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: [01/JAN/2000]

  Witness Information

  • Name: Clay Thompson
    Date of Birth: N/A
    Phone Number: N/A
    Occupation: Staff Sergeant, LSSD

  Witness Statement

  • SD & PD were on a scene that was code 4, dealing with clean up. The scene was done in the Vespucci canal area if I'm remembering correctly as I had to run up a flight of stairs towards the main street to witness the altercation between the PD detective, and Alejandro Montana. When I reached the top of the stairs I saw the PD Detective and Alejandro Montana already in an altercation, Alejandro Montana had tackled Detective Allen onto the ground and began to attack them, I did not see if a weapon was in their hand.
    
    Detective Allen got back on their feet, withdrew their firearm and pointed it at Alejandro Montana, in which Alejandro Montana continued to chase after Detective Allen and tackle them. Detective Allen shot at the suspect before he was tackled once more and then Alejandro Montana continued to attack him while the Detective was on the ground, again I did not witness a weapon in their hand. When Detective Allen was tackled to the ground and being attacked again, even after shots were fired at the individual Alejandro Montana this is when I from across the street aimed my rifle at Alejandro Montana and shot them before they could seriously injure Detective Allen.
    
    Detective Allen then began arresting procedures for Alejandro Montana and I went back to focusing on my scene.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Clay Thompson, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Staff Sergeant Clay Thompson
    
    Date: [01/JAN/2000]

  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION TO AMEND

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana
#25-BT-0110

A Motion to Amend was filed in the above case on the 18th of August, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Amend, the original charges with the underlined amended charges.

• Original Charges
  • WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee
  • GM14 - Obstruction of Justice

• Amended Charges
  • SF02 - Attempted Murder of a Government Employee
  • GM14 - Obstruction of Justice

• Detailed Explanation: It is clear from the evidence provided in discovery that this attack was not just an attempt to injure a law enforcement officer; this was an all-out hysterical attack, with the single purpose of inflicting lethal injury to Detective Allen of the LSPD. The defendant's attack was unprovoked and excessive. The repeated stabbing of the detective and tackling to keep them from getting away, and continued repeated stabbing even when facing lethal force from a firearm, all show the defendant's single-minded purpose and drive to injure and kill the detective then and there, risking their own life to do it.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana
#25-BT-0110

A Motion for Summary Judgment was filed in the above case on the 18th of August, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Summary Judgment, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Explicit evidence
  • Detailed Explanation: The arrest report and subsequent witness statements detail how law enforcement officers from the Los Santos Police Department and the Los Santos Sheriff's Department were conducting an investigation as well as an arrest resulting thereof. During this procedure, the defendant approaches the scene and begins verbally harassing those present at the scene, including the officers conducting the arrest. As the LSPD's Detective Allen is moving from the arrest to their vehicle, the defendant follows the detective and engages verbally with them before drawing a knife and attacking the detective, stabbing them several times. The detective gets away from the defendant and discharges their firearm at the defendant multiple times, but is tackled by the defendant, who then continues to try to stab the detective. The attack on the detective ends when deputies from the LSSD, also involved with the previous arrest, arrive on the scene and shoot down the detective's would-be killer, injuring them.
    
    The narrative provided in the arrest report and witness statements is wholly confirmed by Detective Allen's bodycam footage, which clearly shows the defendant approaching and interfering with the scene by verbally disturbing and harassing the officers. The bodycam footage also shows the defendant engaging with Detective Allen right before they initiate their attack. The attack is senseless and violent, with the defendant tackling the detective to keep them from getting away and to continue stabbing them, facing lethal force and risking their own life to continue their mindless attack.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court formally recognises the Motion for Discovery, Motion to Amend and Motion for Summary Judgement filed by the Prosecution on the 18th day of August, 2025.
  
  Defendant, please indicate to the Court within the next seven (7) days whether you will be self-representing, getting a private defense attorney or require a public defender.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Alejandro Montana]

I would like to drop this court case because I literally can not find a lawyer, Justice system fails again.

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Horton,
  
  The Public Defense Division appreciates the Court’s time and consideration. We are in the process of consulting with the Defendant to determine how they wish to proceed. As this consultation remains ongoing (via email), the Defense respectfully requests a brief hold on dismissing the case prior to confirming the above request.
  
  We are requesting an additional seven (7) days.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court will allow an additional seven (7) day extension to ensure the Defendant has had the opportunity to discuss the matter with a Public Defense Attorney.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alejandro Montana
#25-BT-0110

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 1st of September, 2025.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Waiting on Defendant Confirmation
  • Detailed Explanation: The defendant has made contact with the public defense division and we are working on a solution together for the case. We are currently awaiting the confirmation from the defendant on how to proceed and would like to request additional time for that confirmation. We would like a total of seven (7) days.

Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court will be allowing the seven (7) day extension.
  
  The Court appreciates the reasoning provided by the Defense, although it would like to see this case proceed sooner rather than later.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Your honor,
  
  The defendant is requesting permission to change their plea from not guilty to no contest, acknowledging that while we may not agree with all the charges applied, the prosecution has presented sufficient evidence for it not to be suitable to proceed further from the defense’s side. We respectfully request that no court fees be applied, given the defendant’s inability to secure suitable representation until later in the proceedings. We understand the burden cases place on the court, but we kindly ask for leniency, as the defendant does not frequent the court system. Thank you for your consideration.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Prosecution, given the change of plea, can you confirm if you wish to still proceed with the Motion to Amend Charges? The Court views the change of plea to be based on the original charges at this time.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Horton and pertaining parties,
  
  The Prosecution will rescind its previous Motion to Amend in favor of the defendant's guilty plea.
  
  However, counter to the Defense's request, the Prosecution is seeking court fines in the amount of $10,000. The court, as well as the Prosecution, has spent a significant amount of time and resources working on this case, with multiple motions to consider; this includes asking for a continuance even after getting in touch with a defense attorney to represent the case. The defendant had all the information available and chose to file a case with the court without securing representation beforehand, knowing the consequences of a dismissal.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  234-9321 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court will be accepting the no contest plea from the Defendant, and as such, their charges will remain on the record.
  
  Regarding the request from the Prosecution, the Court will not be issuing any fines in this instance; however, it will be issuing a direct warning to the defendant. The Prosecution is correct in stating that each case comes with significant effort from multiple parties, and for an individual to later plead no contest or guilty to their original charges can be a drain on these resources. As this is the first time that you have used the Court system, in conjunction with the fact that you had difficulties securing representation, the Court will not issue any fines in this particular instance.
  
  So Ordered,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]