
Los Santos County Sheriff's Department Public Information Request Sheriff's Information Division |
Contact Information
Your Name: Solomon Cobb
Your Phone Number: 42
Your Email Address: [email protected]
Your Position in Your Agency (If Applicable): Owner
Your Phone Number: 42
Your Email Address: [email protected]
Your Position in Your Agency (If Applicable): Owner
Request Information
Detailed information of your request:
#CobbBlog has been made aware of, and given evidence of a few incidents and wish to ask the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department the following general questions in relation to find out your official response before anything is posted:
#CobbBlog has been made aware of, and given evidence of a few incidents and wish to ask the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department the following general questions in relation to find out your official response before anything is posted:
- How often does LSSD drug test employees, random or otherwise?
- How many deputies, if any, in the last few months faced disciplinary action as a result of drug use (specifically, marijuana. I'm looking for numbers, specifics obviously not required)?
- If a deputy is caught using marijuana, is there any LSSD policy that would subject them to harsher internal punishments than just the charge in the penal code?
- If a member of the public witnesses a deputy smoking marijuana on duty, how do you propose they follow up with this concern?
- How does LSSD respond to the 'rumour' that 2 deputies (which I will not name, yet) carved the word "LOST" onto the forehead of a gang member to start a war between the gangs known as OTF and Lost MC? Do you deny such a rumour?
- Finally, is it factual that the reason the LSSD has not provided evidence to the prosecution of JB for the Nathaniel Luceran prison break case because the LSSD believes the evidence is tainted due to the lead investigator having sexual relations with the suspect the night before the arrest (or intimate relations in general)?
- If not, could you please explain the reasoning behind not working with the prosecution on this case in particular?
- If so, what steps has LSSD taken on this?






