#25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Locked
Ivy Jefferson
Posts: 45
Joined: 07 Nov 2024, 12:00
ECRP Forum Name: Kevin Jacobs
Discord: KevWolfttv

#25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Ivy Jefferson »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Ivy Hirano
Defendant Phone: REDACTED email me
(( Defendant Discord: KevWolfttv ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender Daniel Carmello
Image
Charging Department: LSSD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 13/JAN/2025 at 8.46PM
Charge(s):
  • Evading
  • Grand Theft Auto
Narrative:
I was wrongfully charged and would like to protest my charges



I, Ivy Hirano, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Last edited by Ivy Jefferson on 06 Mar 2025, 15:01, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas vs Ivy Hirano

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Defendant,

    We appreciate you taking the time to make the initial post, however you have not provided the date or even a semblance of a time that the prosecution or court could use to determine whether or not this case is viable to be seen by the superior court. That being said, if you cannot take the time to reach out to Law Enforcement, defense counsel, Government, or anyone with access to an MDC, then we will have to refuse your case. You have 48 hours to make the change.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Ivy Jefferson
Posts: 45
Joined: 07 Nov 2024, 12:00
ECRP Forum Name: Kevin Jacobs
Discord: KevWolfttv

Re: State of San Andreas vs Ivy Hirano

Post by Ivy Jefferson »

Will have it done today
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas vs Ivy Hirano

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Hirano

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 16th day of January, 2025.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Hirano (Raven)

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)
#25-BT-0044

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano) is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)
#25-BT-0044

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 5th of May, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Ivy Hirano, 11/JAN/2025
    Image
    ARREST REPORT
    MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT 1 DETAILS


    • Full Name: Ivy Hirano
      Telephone Number: 2712264
      Licenses Suspended: Yes
      • Driver
      • Trucker

      Charges:
      • GF11 - Grand Theft Auto
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer


      Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :


    VEHICLES INVOLVED


    DEPUTY DETAILS
    • Full Name: William Tesla
      Badge Number: 1654
      Callsign: 2-D-34


    INCIDENT DETAILS
    • Date of Arrest: 2025-01-11
      Deputies Involved: Master Deputy William Tesla

      Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
      • I saw a vehicle failing to pay a toll. When I pulled over said vehicle, the driver refused to turn the engine off. I got additional units rolling, and eventually the suspect evaded. She then crashed into double tolls, where she was taken into custody. I got a female officer to search her, and she didn't have the keys to the vehicle. She was then charged, the vehicle was securely impounded, and she was brought to DOC.

    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
      Exhibit A: Screwdriver X1

      Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)
      Image
    ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
    Image

    Image
  • Exhibit #2: Bodycam footage - Master Deputy William Tesla, 11/JAN/2025
  • Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Master Deputy William Tesla
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Case Number: [Case Number]
      Incident Date: [11/JAN/2025]
    Witness Information
    • Name: [William Tesla]
      Date of Birth: [17/JAN/1986]
      Phone Number: [514 - 1090]
      Occupation: [Master Deputy within the Los Santos Sheriff's Department]
    Witness Statement
    • The driver of the Purple Elegy Retro Custom, with the L/P 5JSQJNXJ, Registered to Willow Thompson failed to pay the toll.

      After I initiated a traffic stop on the suspect, the suspect refused to turn off the engine, which escalated the situation from a citation for failure to pay a toll to a failure to comply. After giving the driver many chances to comply, demanding it through the megaphone countless times, the driver still refused to comply. By then I had backup on scene and when I stepped out and informed the driver that she'd be placed under arrest for failure to comply, she took off, in an attempt to evade. The chase was brief, as the suspect proceeded to crash into double tolls, where she was blocked in. She refused to be searched by myself, so I got a female officer on scene to pat the suspect down.

      Throughout the whole interaction she was hostile. At the beginning of the interaction, she stated that she was borrowing the vehicle from a friend, and that the owner of the vehicle was Gina Harper, which was not the case. The suspect didn't have any keys to the vehicle and since I wasn't able to get in touch with the owner, we securely impounded the elegy retro custom for it to be retrieved by the owner later on.


      Her story changed during the situation, as initially, she claimed that the R/O of the vehicle was Gina Harper, and when she found out that the R/O was different, her story then changed to be that she just got into an unlocked, started vehicle and drove away.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, [William Tesla], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      [William Tesla]
      [Master Deputy]
      [Los Santos Sheriff's Department]

      Date: [15/JAN/2025]
    Image

Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Ivy Jefferson
Posts: 45
Joined: 07 Nov 2024, 12:00
ECRP Forum Name: Kevin Jacobs
Discord: KevWolfttv

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Ivy Jefferson »

We have scheduled these before already please use my latest Availablity please any day and anytime works for me
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Defendant,

    As you have successfully scheduled multiple cases in the Superior Court via the bench trial time slot application, we encourage you to file the necessary paperwork as there are many working parties that need to be informed prior to the handling of your case. Thank you for your understanding and compliance.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Ivy Jefferson
Posts: 45
Joined: 07 Nov 2024, 12:00
ECRP Forum Name: Kevin Jacobs
Discord: KevWolfttv

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Ivy Jefferson »

Your Honor,

I have 5 trials on THIRD waiting to be scheduled and by your words i cannot schedule them all in one week so i will need more time
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    Given the defendants correct attempts to schedule their other two trials, the courts will be scheduling the two cases, and restarting the notices for the additional three. Thank you for your cooperation.

    This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6481
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0044 State of San Andreas vs Ivy Raven (Hirano)

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)
#25-BT-0044

A decision was reached in the above case on the 27th day of July, 2025.


Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be accepting the plea of guilty from the defendant. The defendant was given ample time to interact with the courts and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As little to no contact has been made with the courts in the past 3-4 weeks, this case will now be archived and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.

Respectfully,

Image
Associate Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Bench Trials”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest