#25-BT-0053 State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)

[Ivy Jefferson]

Defendant Name: Ivy Hirano
Defendant Phone: 271-2264
(( Defendant Discord: KevWolfttv ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender, Daniel Carmello

Charging Department: Jordan Blix

Date & Time of Incident(s): 16/01/2025 21:05
Charge(s):

• GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
• GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
• VF01 - Evading an Officer
• GM19 - Face Concealment (b)

Narrative:
Was Wrongfully arrested

---

I, Ivy Hirano, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Hirano

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 21st day of January, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)
#25-BT-0053

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano) is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)
#25-BT-0053

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 18th of May, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Ivy Hirano, 16/JAN/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  MUGSHOT

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Ivy Hirano
      Phone Number: 2712264
      Licenses Suspended: Yes
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Detective III Cyrus Carver
      • Police Officer III Jordan Blix
      Charges:
      • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
      • GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Incident Date: 16/JAN/2025
      
      Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • We were previously chasing Arthur Green who has evaded. During the pursuit, Arthur Green was TCed off his bike. Once Arthur was TCed off his bike, our suspect Ivy Hirano got on Arthur's bike and fled the scene. During the midst of all that, Arthur hopped onto Ivy's bike and also fled the scene. We concentrated on pursuing Ivy as we had suspicion that Arthur was armed and his firearm was in his bike that Ivy fled in. Soon after, Ivy ran out of fuel for the vehicle and began evading on foot. She was soon placed under custody and sent off to DOC.
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Possessions:
        
        
        Legal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Bag
        
        
        Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

        

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Detective Cyrus Carver

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: State of San Andreas v. Ivy Hirano
    Incident Date: 16/JAN/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Cyrus Carver
    Date of Birth: 16/AUG/1990
    Phone Number: 452-1940
    Occupation: Law Enforcement

  Witness Statement

  • Arthur Green was being pursued by Law Enforcement. During the chase, a vehicle containing Ivy Hirano was seen following the pursuit. After a long-winded chase through Los Santos - Arthur Green took a turn into an alleyway and ditched his vehicle. Officers followed on foot and Arthur Green ran toward the same vehicle with Ivy Hirano inside it. During the foot chase, Ivy Hirano exited the vehicle and got onto Arthur Greens motorcycle that he used to evade and drove off. This led officers to chase of Ivy Hirano in order to recover the evidence. A couple of minutes into the chase, Ivy Hirano stopped on the side of the road. When officers told her to step off the motorcycle she turned her engine on and evaded again. The chase lasted just as long as Arthur Greens. Ivy Hirano was finally taken into custody after she ran out of fuel near the bank on Hawick.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Cyrus Carver, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    Cyrus Carver
    Detective
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 05/FEB/2025

  

• Exhibit #3: Bodycam footage - Police Detective Cyrus Carver, 16/JAN/2025

  BODYCAM FOOTAGE
  ((Proof of RP))

• Exhibit #4: Witness statement - Police Officer Jordan Blix

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 16/01/2025 UTC

  Witness Information

  • Name: Jordan Blix
    Date of Birth: 01/JAN/2000
    Phone Number: #54321
    Occupation: Police Officer III, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • Going by the arrest reports of Arthur Green and Ivy Hirano;
    "Arthur Green was pulled over in relations to a previous scene. I conducted a 10-55 gaining PID on Arthur, I instructed him to step off his bike. He then fled, turning the 10-55 into a pursuit. During the pursuit, Arthur ditched his bike and got onto another bike and fled the scene, as soon as I was trying to retrieve Arthur's bike, having suspicion that it had a firearm in it. Ivy Hirano hopped on it and fled. At this point, I've put out an arrest for Arthur Green as we've lost him. I turned my attention to Ivy and pursued Ivy as she stole Arthur's bike and fled the scene. Ivy was soon apprehended and placed under custody. During the pursuit of Ivy, a vehicle that was registered to Arthur Green was around the scene. Units were instructed to 10-55 the vehicle but the vehicle fled. Pursuit lasted about 10 minutes before the vehicle TCed into a unit. During the arrest procedure we identified the driver as Arthur Green. So the suspect was charged with two felony evading as it involved two different situations with two different vehicles."
    
    "We were previously chasing Arthur Green who has evaded. During the pursuit, Arthur Green was TCed off his bike. Once Arthur was TCed off his bike, our suspect Ivy Hirano got on Arthur's bike and fled the scene. During the midst of all that, Arthur hopped onto Ivy's bike and also fled the scene. We concentrated on pursuing Ivy as we had suspicion that Arthur was armed and his firearm was in his bike that Ivy fled in. Soon after, Ivy ran out of fuel for the vehicle and began evading on foot. She was soon placed under custody and sent off to DOC."
    
    I was enforcing gang details with Detective Carver at the time due to high gun related crimes coming from the organization Ivy Hirano belongs to. Within that week Ivy Hirano was involved in multiple shootings with LEOs where multiple Officers has been injured personally by Ivy Hirano. If you look at Ivy Hirano's activity within that week and the week before, Ivy has been arrested NUMEROUS times, committing crimes such as shooting at LEOs and as far as kidnapping LEOs. All this can be searched in our government database. Below, the first two arrest reports are directly relating to this case, and the last one is just an example of numerous arrest reports dating back or around when this incident happened showing the types of crimes she has committed. Finally, if a witness is needed, Detective Carver was present during the whole situation.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Jordan Blix, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Jordan Blix
    Police Officer III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 29/JAN/2025

  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Ivy Jefferson]

Yet again any day and have already scheduled my availability

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Defendant,
  
  As you have successfully scheduled multiple cases in the Superior Court via the bench trial time slot application, we encourage you to file the necessary paperwork as there are many working parties that need to be informed prior to the handling of your case. Thank you for your understanding and compliance.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  Given this is the only case by the defendant that has attempted a scheduling notice, the court will be restarting the scheduling timeline for this individual case.
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Court Clerk
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ivy Raven (Hirano)
#25-BT-0053

A decision was reached in the above case on the 27th day of July, 2025.

Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be accepting the plea of guilty from the defendant. The defendant was given ample time to interact with the courts and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As little to no contact has been made with the courts in the past 3-4 weeks, this case will now be archived and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]