#25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Locked
Roberto Sanchez
Posts: 25
Joined: 08 Jun 2018, 15:10
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

#25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Roberto Sanchez »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Roberto Sanchez
Defendant Phone: 3675838
Defendant Address: No Fixed Obode
(( Defendant Discord: @mrsilky ))
Requested Attorney: N/A if none NA
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 24/06/2024 - 11:45PM
Charge(s):
  • Bank Robbery
  • Face Concealment
Narrative:
The charges placed were false and I contest them in their entirety.

I approached Highway Gas to refuel my Gargoyle and Mario and Elise were arresting Callum Goat. They moved to investigate me also and I complied with all orders. They searched me, ID'd me, and even had me roll up my trouser legs to take pictures of my tattoos. After this gross breach of my rights, Mario informed me I was not the individual he assumed I was and that I was free to go but queried searching my bike - as I had nothing to hide, and to not have further harassment, I agreed.

Inside my bike, he found some clothes that were in there which I was not aware of - held them up to look at them and placed me in cuffs. He informed me that the clothes matched a suspect from a bank robbery 3 hours prior and that I was getting charged with the above.

This is laughable and there was no further investigation. Many people have access to my bike and it was parked at a public location at the Eastside Club parking lot so anyone could have placed those clothes in there. It was not me, I was not wearing the clothes, I did not rob a bank.

Before you ask, I do NOT want a plea deal to plead no contest. I am NOT GUILTY and will pursue this case in its entirety until I get a just verdict.

I, Roberto Sanchez, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 3101
Joined: 21 May 2021, 03:11
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 26th day of June, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Roberto Sanchez
Posts: 25
Joined: 08 Jun 2018, 15:10
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Roberto Sanchez »

Hello?

Any chance this can move along this year?
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

#25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 16th of January, 2025.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez is hereby activated by this Court under #25-CM-0006.

Both the State and Defendant in this case are still awaiting adequate representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned for the Defendant and a State Prosecutor has been assigned to the case and both parties inform the court they are ready to proceed.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.


Respectfully,

Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Roberto Sanchez
Posts: 25
Joined: 08 Jun 2018, 15:10
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Roberto Sanchez »

Please can the attorney general be assigned the prosecutor in this case? Free W.

I will have which ever public defender has the time and availability to undertake this case please.
User avatar
Hugh Allgood
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1050
Joined: 17 Sep 2021, 21:33
ECRP Forum Name: HotPipinLeo
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hugh Allgood »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 17/Jan/2025.


I, Hugh R. Allgood, a Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the defendant, Roberto Sanchez, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Image
Court Clerk / Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
Image
Finlay Mcculloch
Posts: 302
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 21:55
ECRP Forum Name: Dangerous
Discord:

SAJB Awards

LSEMS Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Finlay Mcculloch »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Defendant

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 19th of January, 2025.


I, Finlay McCulloch, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the defendant, Roberto Sanchez, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Image
Court Clerk / Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Defense counsel,

    Thank you for your swift notification of counsel. The case is now awaiting the assignment of a prosecutor. Please be patient while one is assigned.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 21st of January 2025.


I, Terence Williams, Attorney General of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will represent the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will take responsibility as Primary Counsel and await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A court order was entered in the above case on 21st of January, 2025.


The case of #25-CM-0005, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

So ordered,

Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 22nd of January, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Roberto Sanchez, 25/JUN/2024
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"


    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Roberto Sanchez
        Phone Number: 3675299
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Captain I Mike Luigi
        • Police Lieutenant II Elise Cavallera
        Charges:
        • SF07 - Bank Robbery
        • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 25/JUN/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • Roberto Sanchez was detained at Great Ocean Gas by Captain Luigi when Captain Luigi noted similarities between Roberto Sanchez and individual that robbed Route 68 bank earlier. Upon inspection of Roberto Sanchez their shoes, gloves, mask, face, skintone and hair all matched with an individual in the bank. Roberto Sanchez willingly complied to a search of their vehicle in which Captain Luigi found a jumper and trousers which led to a complete match of clothing with Roberto Sanchez and the individual seen within Route 68 bank. Additionally, Roberto Sanchez had confirmed ties to every other individual arrested for the same bank robbery.

          **CCTV**
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Mask


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Clothing x3
          Exhibit B: Radio
          Exhibit C: GPS
          Exhibit D: Switchblade

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Captain Mike Luigi
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 24/JUN/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Mike Luigi
      Date of Birth: 07/JAN/1997
      Phone Number: 381-5045
      Occupation: Police Captain I, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • **Route 68 Bank CCTV - 24/JUN/2024 21:05-21:10**
      **Route 68 Bank CCTV - Screen captures**
      **MLUIGI_BODYCAM_24JUN2024**

      Jacob Tartel, Tyler Leone and Callum Goat were all also arrested for their involvement in the bank robbery. These three individuals along with Roberto Sanchez are all affiliates of the gang known as ESM.

      Roberto Sanchez was initially stopped due to Captain Luigi noting similarities between them and individuals from the Route 68 Bank Robbery. Captain Luigi requested Roberto Sanchez to lift up their leg to check for any matching tattoos that may be visible as their arm tattoos already showing were similar to those of Suspect B. Roberto Sanchez willingly entertained Captain Luigi's request and upon viewing Roberto Sanchez's calf tattoo they were ruled out as Suspect B.

      Captain Luigi still noted some items of clothing Roberto Sanchez was wearing, along with skin color, hair color and hair style, that matched Suspect A. As seen when Captain Luigi first approaches Roberto Sanchez. **MLUIGI_BODYCAM_IMG**

      Roberto Sanchez continued to willing fully submit themselves and their vehicle to search by Captain Luigi. Within Roberto Sanchez's Gargoyle, an exact match of trousers and a sweater were found to those Suspect A was wearing. With these two pieces of clothing, Roberto Sanchez has a full outfit matching that of Suspect A, not a single piece of clothing was missing. Roberto Sanchez was wearing, or in possession of, Suspect A's mask, sweater, gloves, trousers, shoes. Roberto Sanchez additionally has matching hair style, color and skin tone as the individual highlighted as Suspect A. Given the exact match and Roberto Sanchez's affiliation with the three suspects already arrested, they were arrested for their involvement as Suspect A.

      To clarify possible date discrepancies, the bank robbery occurred on 24/JUN/2024 with Roberto Sanchez being arrested in the early hours of 25/JUN/2024.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Mike Luigi, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      Mike Luigi
      Police Captain I
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 06/JUL/2024
    Image
  • Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Police Lieutenant Elise Cavallera
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 25/JUN/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Elise Cavallera
      Date of Birth: 15/MAY/1993
      Phone Number: 2873081
      Occupation: Police Lieutenant II, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I was patrolling with Captain Luigi after a bank robbery on Route 68. We had Cortez Rivera detained for investigation in relation to said Bank robbery, when Roberto Sanchez pulled up on his bike. Captain Luigi noticed Roberto Sanchez was of a similiar build as one of the bank robbery, so he told him that he was detained and asked him if he can search the bike. Upon searching the bike, he noticed that the clothing of the Bank robber matched the one that Roberto Sanchez had in his bike. Due to the similiar build of Roberto, same clothing and several of his fellow gang members being arrested for the same bank robbery, Captain Luigi decided to arrest him for it.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Elise Cavallera, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Elise Cavallera
      Elise Cavallera
      Police Lieutenant II
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 02/JUL/2024
    Image
  • Exhibit #4: CCTV footage - Route 68 Fleeca Bank, 24/JUN/2024 2105-2110
  • Exhibit #5: Photograph - CCTV images of suspect
    Image
    Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #6: Photograph - image of defendant
    Image
  • Exhibit #7: Physical evidence - defendant clothing
    Image
  • Exhibit #8: Arrest report - Tyler Leone, 24/JUN/2024
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Tyler Leone
        Phone Number: 2083336
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Captain I Mike Luigi
        • Police Lieutenant II Elise Cavallera
        Charges:
        • SF07 - Bank Robbery
        • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
        • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 24/JUN/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • Tyler Leone was found on Great Ocean Highway in the area of an illegal shipment drop. Tyler Leone was noted to have clothing matching that of a recent bank robbery at route 68. Captain Luigi approached Tyler Leone, ordering them to turn off their vehicle. Tyler Leone verbally continued to refuse as they slowly crept forward, Captain Luigi proceeded to tase Tyler Leone and detain them. Tyler Leone was found to have clothes being an exact match to those of the recent bank robbery and was arrested. Tyler Leone was also found alongside Rosalina Leone who also had a matching clothing to a female seen on CCTV footage from the bank robbery.

          **CCTV**
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Skull mask


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Clothing x2
          Exhibit B: Radio
          Exhibit C: Bag - GPS

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #9: Arrest report - Callum Goat, 25/JUN/2024
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Callum Goat
        Phone Number: 3652044
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Captain I Mike Luigi
        • Police Lieutenant II Elise Cavallera
        Charges:
        • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
        • SF07 - Bank Robbery
        • DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed
        • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
        • GC06 - Possession of Cannabis
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 25/JUN/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • Callum Goat was detained at Great Ocean Gas by Captain Luigi when Captain Luigi noted an exact match of clothing, accessories and skin tone between Callum Goat and individual that robbed Route 68 bank earlier. Callum Goat also had a firearm in their possessions which was a match to the one used in the bank robbery. Additionally, Callum Goat had confirmed ties to every other individual arrested for the same bank robbery.

          **CCTV**
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Mask
          Exhibit B: SNS Pistol - 1712485115176
          Exhibit C: Marijuana x2


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Bag
          Exhibit B: Clothing x4
          Exhibit C: GPS
          Exhibit D: Radio

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image

Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
Finlay Mcculloch
Posts: 302
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 21:55
ECRP Forum Name: Dangerous
Discord:

SAJB Awards

LSEMS Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Finlay Mcculloch »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Motion to Compel Discovery was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;


  • Requested Discovery: Body Camera Footage in full, Captain Mike Luigi
    • Detailed Reasoning: In the Captain's witness statement he reveals still-shot images of his footage. We ask for the full footage so we can review the incident in its entirety.

  • Requested Discovery: Body Camera Footage in full, Lieutenant Elise Cavallera
    • Detailed Reasoning: We would like to review the body camera footage of Lieutenant Cavallera to ensure that the witness statement and arrest report are consistent with said footage.


Image
Court Clerk / Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]
Image
Image
Finlay Mcculloch
Posts: 302
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 21:55
ECRP Forum Name: Dangerous
Discord:

SAJB Awards

LSEMS Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Finlay Mcculloch »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION TO SUPPRESS


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;


  • Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Captain Mike Luigi
    Requested Evidence to Suppress:
    These three individuals along with Roberto Sanchez are all affiliates of the gang known as ESM.

    Given the exact match and Roberto Sanchez's affiliation with the three suspects already arrested, they were arrested for their involvement as Suspect A.
    • Detailed Reasoning: We respectfully request that the court suppress any and all references to gang affiliation, membership, or alleged association of the defendant, Roberto Sanchez. Such references are far more prejudicial than they are probative and pose a serious risk of inflaming the bias of the judge. This violates Mr. Sanchez’s right to a fair trial, as gang affiliation has no material bearing on the charges of robbery and adds nothing to the prosecution’s case, other than its prejudicial effect. The prosecution is entitled to a trial based on the evidence, not prejudicial associations that distract from the facts.

  • Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Police Lieutenant Elise Cavallera
    Requested Evidence to Suppress:
    and several of his fellow gang members being arrested for the same bank robbery
    • Detailed Reasoning: We respectfully request that the court suppress any and all references to gang affiliation, membership, or alleged association of the defendant, Roberto Sanchez. Such references are far more prejudicial than they are probative and pose a serious risk of inflaming the bias of the judge. This violates Mr. Sanchez’s right to a fair trial, as gang affiliation has no material bearing on the charges of robbery and adds nothing to the prosecution’s case, other than its prejudicial effect. The prosecution is entitled to a trial based on the evidence, not prejudicial associations that distract from the facts.

  • Exhibit #8: Arrest report - Tyler Leone, 24/JUN/2024
    Requested Evidence to Suppress:
    Entire Exhibit
    • Detailed Reasoning: We respectfully request that you suppress the arrest reports of the other suspects apprehended in connection with the Route 68 bank robbery. Instead, the prosecution wants to prove guilt through association, they are relying on circumstantial evidence to link them to these individuals. No evidence has been put forward to demonstrate any direct communication, planning, or coordination with these individuals, and Mr. Sanchez is not mentioned in either report. The prosecution is injecting highly prejudicial and speculative allegations that inappropriately taint the judge against Mr. Sanchez.’

      These reports are not relevant to the material facts of the case and serve simply to distract the judge from the total lack of direct evidence against Mr. Sanchez. They would violate his right to a fair trial, by engendering biases and constructing a narrative of collective guilt that is not substantiated by the evidence.

  • Exhibit #9: Arrest report - Callum Goat, 25/JUN/2024
    Requested Evidence to Suppress:
    Entire Exhibit
    • Detailed Reasoning: We respectfully request that you suppress the arrest reports of the other suspects apprehended in connection with the Route 68 bank robbery. Instead, the prosecution wants to prove guilt through association, they are relying on circumstantial evidence to link them to these individuals. No evidence has been put forward to demonstrate any direct communication, planning, or coordination with these individuals, and Mr. Sanchez is not mentioned in either report. The prosecution is injecting highly prejudicial and speculative allegations that inappropriately taint the judge against Mr. Sanchez.’

      These reports are not relevant to the material facts of the case and serve simply to distract the judge from the total lack of direct evidence against Mr. Sanchez. They would violate his right to a fair trial, by engendering biases and constructing a narrative of collective guilt that is not substantiated by the evidence.


Image
Court Clerk / Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Prosecution and defense counsel,

    The court acknowledges confirmation from law enforcement that Callum Goat, Tyler Leone, and Roberto Sanchez were identified as affiliates or members of the same criminal organization at the time of the referenced arrest. While such affiliation may serve as circumstantial evidence supporting certain claims or elements, the court emphasizes that rulings will not be based solely on affiliation without corroborating evidence.

    This case highlights procedural challenges regarding the establishment of affiliation. Previously, prosecution was required to obtain expert witness statements from law enforcement agencies to confirm affiliations, which occasionally led to evidentiary suppression or omissions due to procedural or drafting errors.

    To improve judicial efficiency and fairness, the court will now verify affiliation directly, consulting with law enforcement and conducting internal reviews. This procedural adjustment ensures a more consistent approach and preserves court resources.

    Moving forward, the following will apply:
    1. Docket-Level Verification: Affiliation determinations will be included as part of docket proceedings.
    2. Defense Challenges: The defense will be afforded the opportunity to challenge any claims of affiliation or submit their own request.
    3. Notification: Both parties will receive notice of the court’s findings regarding affiliation during discovery to ensure transparency and facilitate an equitable trial process.
    4. Finality: Once affiliation has been confirmed by a judge, it cannot be challenged unless an appeal of the ruling is submitted to the Court of Appeals with sufficient probable cause.
    These procedural changes are effective immediately and will apply to all relevant cases moving forward.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Rebuttal


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Rebuttal was filed in the above case on the 27th of January, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, presents a rebuttal to the recent motion;

  • Exhibits #2: Witness statement - Police Captain Mike Luigi and #3: Witness statement - Police Lieutenant Elise Cavallera
    Following the recent confirmation of affiliation between the defendant, Roberto Sanchez, and Callum Goat and Tyler Leone, the Prosecution requests that suppression of these exhibits be denied due to a lack of foundation. While affiliation was part of the reasonable suspicions against the defendant, it is not the basis of the defendant's arrest, and suppressing these exhibits would be unjust.

  • Exhibits #8: Arrest report - Tyler Leone, 24/JUN/2024and #9: Arrest report - Callum Goat, 25/JUN/2024
    While affiliation was part of the reasonable suspicion against the defendant, it is not the basis for the defendant's arrest. These reports are part of the Prosecution's narrative in the case against the defendant, and with the confirmation of affiliation, provide relevant context to the case.




Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hugh Allgood
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1050
Joined: 17 Sep 2021, 21:33
ECRP Forum Name: HotPipinLeo
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hugh Allgood »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Personal Email

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • To all parties ,

    The Defense presents its final response as the petitioning party.

    The prosecution states, “ While affiliation was part of the reasonable suspicions against the defendant, it is not the basis of the defendant's arrest, and suppressing these exhibits would be unjust.”

    We would argue that if the alleged affiliation is not the basis of the defendant’s arrest, then by the prosecution’s own narrative, it lacks relevance to this case and therefore this evidence should be suppressed from the docket due to lacking relevance.

    While the prosecution goes on to explain the alleged affiliation “ provide relevant context to the case.”, it’s important to note that individuals who are uninvolved with one another can rob a bank together just as individuals who are affiliated can. Therefore, any alleged affiliation is irrelevant to this case - the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Roberto Sanchez robbed a bank. Just because some alleged affiliates of his allegedly did so, does not make Roberto Sanchez’s involvement so.

    We respectfully rest on this issue and await the order of this Court.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Court Clerk / Public Defender
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A decision was reached in the above case on the 29th day of January, 2025.


Defense Motion to Compel Discovery

The defense is attempting to compel bodycam from both officers that were in the same vehicle. It is the ruling of the court that two instances of the same footage from different angles is not needed at this point in time for this specific case. We will however be granting part of the motion, and requiring the prosecution provide the footage gained from Captain Mike Luigi in regards to this crime/arrest. The prosecution is being given 72 hours to comply. If more time is needed, you may submit a motion for continuance for review. ((Please find a way to RP with the defendant or officer. If this cannot be done because memory does not serve either party, then feel free to state the footage was corrupt or something of that nature. Thank you.))

Exhibit #2 Suppression

The court has recognized the affiliation of the members and therefore denies the defenses motion to suppress. We recognize these statements as factual at the time of the arrest. We appreciate the effort of the defense, and do not aim to diminish their work. We hope the explanation given in the above post provides a sufficient explanation.

The court would like to highlight, "while such affiliation may serve as circumstantial evidence supporting certain claims or elements, the court emphasizes that rulings will not be based solely on affiliation without corroborating evidence." As the defense correctly argued, "individuals who are uninvolved with one another can rob a bank together just as individuals who are affiliated can."

Exhibit #3 Suppression

Same response as exhibit #2.

Exhibit #8 Suppression

Same response as exhibit #2 with the addition that the individuals in question have participated in the crime or allegedly participated in the crime with the defendant. The court may have ruled in favor of the defense, had the arrest reports not been directly linked to the contested crimes alleged.

Exhibit #9 Suppression

Same response as exhibit #8.


So Ordered,

Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Prosecution and defense counsel,

    If no appeals are posted based off the above ruling, the court will be proceeding to scheduling in the next 72 hours.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 5th day of February, 2025.

  • All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

    In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

    In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

    If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


    Respectfully,

    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Kant,

    The Prosecution has filed its availability.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A trial date was set on the above case on 13th of February, 2025.


In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 09:00 PM on 22nd of February, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,

Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Finlay Mcculloch
Posts: 302
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 21:55
ECRP Forum Name: Dangerous
Discord:

SAJB Awards

LSEMS Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Finlay Mcculloch »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A Motion for Involuntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 13th of February, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;


  • Reasoning: Failure to Comply with a Court Order
    • Detailed Explanation: The defense respectfully requests that the charges in this case be dismissed, given the prosecution’s failure to produce a crucial piece of evidence of which this Court has ordered the production. The court ordered the prosecution to produce bodycam footage from Captain Mike Luigi about the crime and the subsequent arrest. The prosecutor had 72 hours to comply and, if more time was needed, could file a motion for continuance.

      Despite the above order directing the prosecution to produce all of the video footage the prosecution failed to do so, the prosecution also failed to request an extension from the court within 72 hours from the issuance of such order. This flagrant mockery of the court’s order isn’t just a procedural misstep, it is a grossly unconstitutional breach of the defendant’s due process rights. Because the missing footage potentially is exculpatory, its absence deprives the defense of a fair opportunity to review all the evidence relevant to the arrest.

      This failure, the defense argues, severely prejudices the defendant, as withheld footage may include critical details that could potentially undermine the prosecution’s case. This failure to comply with a direct court order not only disrespects the integrity of these proceedings but also continues, a dangerous precedent for prosecutorial misconduct.

      In light of the prosecution’s failures to comply and the resulting prejudice to the defense, the only appropriate remedy is the dismissal of this case. The prosecution had sufficient opportunity to comply with the court’s order or, at the very least, to inform us of any difficulties complying. Their failure to do so deserves the strongest possible remedy.

      For all of the above reasons, the defense respectfully submits that the case be dismissed with prejudice.

Respectfully,

Image
Court Clerk / Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]

and

Image
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,

    Sincere apologies for not responding to the docket regarding the request. Chaos has reigned recently and taken a lot of focus, and since no new information will be provided, a response was forgotten. The Prosecution has attempted to clear up the corrupted bodycam footage that was initially provided as part of Exhibit #2, as well as trying to get an uncorrupted version from Captain Luigi. However, nothing has helped in recovering the footage, and as such, the Prosecution is unable to provide the information requested by the referenced court order.

    ((I have previously contacted the player, but considering it has been 8 months since the incident, I think it's fair that they cannot be expected to recount events reliably enough to be able to provide RP to substitute real footage.))

    Touching on the Defense's Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, the Prosecution believes the motion to be unfounded. While a lack of answer on the docket in response to the motion is unfortunate and regrettable, the Prosecution complied with the order to the best of its abilities by attempting to gain access to a usable version of the evidence requested by the Defense. As such, none of the defendant's rights were breached.

    The claim that this footage could potentially be exculpatory has no foundation. The amount of evidence provided on the docket, including statements, physical evidence, and CCTV, is already substantial to such a degree that there is no reasonable expectation of new evidence becoming accessible through the requested footage. The Prosecution has withheld no footage, as no viewable footage exists, and to say that the lack of evidence is prejudicial against the defendant is absurd.


    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hugh Allgood
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1050
Joined: 17 Sep 2021, 21:33
ECRP Forum Name: HotPipinLeo
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hugh Allgood »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Personal Email

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Honorable Justice Kant,

    The prosecution aims to play semantics with the court, all at the expense of the defendant and his rights. To claim the prosecution complied with the order is absurd. The prosecution should have obtained this information during its investigation of the appeal when it was filed - the lack of competence and preparation of the case against the defendant is very striking.

    The prosecution then doubles down and claims the evidence is so strong that the defendant’s belief of a potential for exculpatory evidence is without foundation. Very dangerous choice of words considering the defendant is still innocent, until and unless proven guilty. The strength of the evidence is for the judge to decide, not the Attorney General.

    Making these statements and bold assertions that rules of evidence exists or doesn’t exist because of the strength of evidence is very… shocking. It also implies the defendant’s constitutional rights can be sidestepped because of the perceived strength of evidence. The prosecution should be held accountable for not doing what the Court required.

    If this counsel had any faith in the bar association, it may even be worth making an ethics complaint.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Court Clerk
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6388
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-CM-0006, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez
#25-CM-0006

A decision was reached in the above case on the 22th day of February, 2025.


Facts

The defendant was detained at Great Ocean Gas by Captain Luigi under suspicion of bank robbery.
The defendant was found in clothing that matched and individual that had robbed a bank, specifically shoes, gloves, mask.
The defendant resembled the same skin tone, face shape, and hair style.
The defendant complied to a search of their vehicle where the officers found a quote 'jumper and trousers' that were a match to the clothing seen on the CCTV footage of the bank robbery.
The defendant is affiliated with the other individuals that were arrested for the same bank robbery.


Verdict

The court finds the initial suspicion of the defendant being an individual participating in a bank robbery to be enough reasonable suspicion for detainment. Detainment allows for officers to ensure their own safety through patting an individual down and checking for weaponry in likely places one would find a hidden item.

The defendant then allowed officers to search his bike which lead to the clear evidence of the defendant not just wearing similar, but visually an exact match in clothing to the individual found on CCTV. The court notes the previous precedence mentioned by the prosecution, and rules in alignment with the previous rulings that a match of clothing, facial structure, skin tone, affiliation and other factors have fulfilled the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

The court would like to take the time to educate individuals on the standard of reasonable doubt in a criminal trial when determining a verdict. If the court were to place a superficial numerical value on the percentage of conviction a judge should have when convicting an individual, one may think of a 90-95% standard. That being said, whether or not a situation is reasonable to determine an individual guilty depends on the amount of factors that have to occur for the individual to be logically or illogically found not guilty or guilty.

For example in this case, the court would've had to come to the terms that a separate individual with the same affiliation woke up one day. Went to the clothing store and perfectly copied the outfit of the defendant, minus his shirt and pants. The individual didn't just buy ANY shirt he bought a long sleeve shirt with a large chicken head on it. The individual also decided to copy his hair, skin tone, and face shape that could be seen on CCTV robbing a bank. Then the individual decided to take the exact two items (again the shirt with a chicken head on it) off themselves and place it into the bike of the defendant. The defendant than drove the bike the next day to get gas and was investigated to be found with the two pieces of clothing, that, if replaced, exactly matches the individual found on the CCTV.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), I find the defendant, Roberto Sanchez, guilty.
  • On the count of SF07 - Bank Robbery, I find the defendant, Roberto Sanchez, guilty.
  • $5,000 fine to the prosecution for failing to respond to a court order in a reasonable time.
So ordered,
Image
Associate Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests