#25-BT-0007 State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

[Dale Lost]

Defendant Name: Dale Lost
Defendant Phone: 2475890
(( Defendant Discord: lewisisdrunk))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney,

Charging Department: SD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 17/12/2024 ##:##
Charge(s):

• GM25 - Possession/Unlawful use of Government Equipment (Misdemeanor $1500)
• WM04 - Possession of Illegal Body Armor (Misdemeanor $2000)

Narrative:
I was unlawfully arrested

---

I, Dale Lost, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Izaak Scott]

- - - - -

---

• To all parties,
  
  Please take notice that the undersigned attorney, Izaak Scott of Assured Law, enters an appearance as counsel for the defendant, Dale Lost, in this matter.
  
  Respectfully submitted on the 26th day of December, 2024.

---

• Sincerely,
  
  Izaak Scott
  Assured Services
  Managing Attorney, Assured Law
  Bluff Tower, 72 Bay City Avenue

- - - - -

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Defense counsel,
  
  Thank you for your notice to the courts. Would the defendants of case State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost and State of San Adreas v Antonio Vitto like to combine their cases or remain separate?
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Superior Court Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Izaak Scott]

Remain separate.

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 5th day of January, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,

Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 5th day of January, 2024.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 7 days.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes to dispute more than just misdemeanor charges or desires a more in-depth examination of the case, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

Respectfully,

Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Larin Tai]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost


A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 13th of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest Report: Dale Lost (18/DEC/2024)

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Dale Lost
    Telephone Number: 2475890
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • WM04 - Possession of Illegal Body Armor
    • GM25 - Possession/Unlawful use of Government Equipment
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 2 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Antonio Vitto
    Telephone Number: 2367350
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  • Vehicle A: Black ,Terminus, DALEE, S2EEAVSANE33PA000, Dale Lost

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: Cole Lawless
    Badge Number: 25605
    Callsign: 3-X-27

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2024-12-18
    Deputies Involved: Louise Hoffman - Nacho Navarro - Luka Rosselli - Alester Carter - William Tesla
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • There was a SIB operation going on and we had hard evidence that there was a shootout inside the Chiliad camp, 2 vehicles left the camp one of them was the Terminus that we intercepted by Chili tunnel registered to Dale Lost, we had an active trace on the person driving the vehicle we followed them until we could pull them over, we detained them as we suspected the people inside that terminus had something to do with the shots inside the camp, the terminus was 3x occupied, Antonio was the driver and Dale was in the passenger seat, upon detaining them and searching them we found multiple illegal passions on both suspects the illegal firearms were related to Antonio as he said that he was the one responsible for it, dale also had a pistol.50 on him which was bought legally and he also informed us about it, also I would like to mention that Dale gave us consent to search his trunk, and after he was placed under arrest for the illegal items he had on him, we searched inside the vehicle and found more illegal items.

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
    Exhibit A: 4x Radio Encryption Zero Day
    Exhibit B: 5x GPS Encryption Zero Day
    Exhibit C: 1x Body Armor
    Exhibit D: 1x Micro smg,
    Exhibit E: 1x Tactical smg
    
    Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)

    
    
    

    ---

  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  
  

  ---

  
  

• Exhibit #2:Witness Statement: Deputy Cole Lawless

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: [18/DEC/2024]

  Witness Information

  • Name: [Cole Lawless]
    Date of Birth: [21/04/1994]
    Phone Number: [377-4812]
    Occupation: [Law Enforcement Employee]

  Witness Statement

  • [There was a SIB operation going on and we had hard evidence that Mr. Dale was involved in a crime while fleeing from the crime scene they were intercepted by Chili Tunnel in a terminus registered to Dale Lost, we had hard evidence that the person was inside the vehicle we followed them until we could pull them over, we detained them as we suspected the people inside that terminus had something to do with the criminal activities within the SIB operation, the terminus was 3x occupied, Antonio was the driver and Dale was in the passenger seat, upon detaining them and searching them we found multiple illegal passions on both suspects the illegal firearms were related to Antonio as he said that he was the one responsible for it, dale also had a pistol.50 on him which was bought legally and he also informed us about it, also I would like to mention that Dale gave us consent to search his trunk, and after he was placed under arrest for the illegal items he had on him, we searched inside the vehicle and found more illegal items.]

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, [Cole Lawless], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    [Cole Lawless]
    [Title, if applicable]
    [Organization, if applicable]
    
    Date: [25/DEC/2024]

  

• Exhibit #3: Witness Statement: Deputy Navarro

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: [01/JAN/2000]

  Witness Information

  • Name: Nacho Navarro
    Date of Birth: 04/DEC/1995
    Phone Number: 487-9468
    Occupation: Sheriff's Deputy

  Witness Statement

  • Myself and Deputy Lawless were conducting an SIB operation when we came across hard evidence a shoot-out was happening inside Chilihad camp. We awaited the arrival of back-up units before moving in, when they arrived the vehicles inside the camp were leaving. Inside the camp were multiple vehicle, one of them being a Terminus. This vehicle was intercepted at Chilihad tunnel and followed. There was a active trace going on the driver of the Terminus and seeing the shots fired that myself and Deputy Lawless witnessed, we pulled the vehicle over. After patting down the suspects for any weapons, we found illegal devices in the possession of Dale along with body armor, which led to us searching his vehicle and finding class 2 firearms inside, which Antonio claimed to be his. Seeing Dale argued he had just pulled these items from the glovebox, it's hard to believe he didn't know there were illegal firearms inside the vehicle. He actively chose to keep the body armor on him, along with all the illegal devices.
    
    I believe he also at one point gave consent to search his vehicle prior.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Nacho Navarro, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Nacho Navarro
    Deputy Sheriff III
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 06/JAN/2025

  

Larin Tai
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
244-5389 — [email protected]

[Izaak Scott]

- - - - -

---

• To all parties,
  
  In the case of State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost, a Motion for Involuntary Dismissal was filed on the 14th of January, 2025.
  
  The Defendant, Dale Lost, through their attorney, submits this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal on the grounds that there is zero probable cause. Furthermore, the evidence presented provides no justification for the search conducted. While motions like this are unusual in a bench trial, we believe that the lack of probable cause is so readily apparent to all viewers that going to trial would be a complete waste of time in a whole.

---

• Sincerely,
  
  Izaak Scott
  Assured Services
  Managing Attorney, Assured Law
  Bluff Tower, 72 Bay City Avenue

- - - - -

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution, defendant, and defense counsel,
  
  Thank you for your recent submission to the courts, defense. Prosecution, would you like to provide your response? You will be given 72 hours after an official prosecutor is signed onto the docket.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Superior Court Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant,
  
  The Prosecution will assign counsel soon to provide a response to the recent motion.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  234-9321 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 16th of January, 2025.

I, Terence Williams, Attorney General of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will represent the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will take responsibility as Primary Counsel and await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

OBJECTION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

An Objection was filed in the above case on the 19th of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this objection to a recent motion by the Defense;

• Statement being objected to: Defense's Motion for Involuntary Dismissal
  
  • Detailed Reasoning: The Defense's claim that the stop of the defendant's vehicle was without probable cause is unfounded. The evidence provided clearly establishes that an ongoing operation uncovered criminal activity in a camp on Mount Chiliad, with shots fired. As this is reported, the defendant's vehicle is seen fleeing the scene. The vehicle and the defendant are then detained for further investigation due to the reasonable suspicion provided by the defendant witnessed fleeing the scene of a crime.

    After patting down the suspects for any weapons, we found illegal devices in the possession of Dale along with body armor, which led to us searching his vehicle and finding class 2 firearms inside[...]

    The rules of reasonable suspicion clearly permits the use of the stop-and-frisk method when investigating individuals suspected of being involved in a crime. As the witness states, when the defendant was patted down they were found to be in possession of multiple pieces of contraband, also physically visibly upon inspection, and this provided the probable cause for further search of the vehicle.
    
    It is with these considerations that the Prosecution request that Your Honor deny the Defense's motion.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Izaak Scott]

- - - - -

---

• To all parties,
  
  First and foremost, this is the defense’s final statement, and we hope the prosecution understands and respects that we maintain the last word on our motion. Secondly, you cannot object to this motion; you may respond, which I believe you intended to do.
  
  After reading this, I believe the prosecution could benefit from borrowing my book from my time as a law student, which I’ve kept in storage. Here it is. In every single piece of evidence, the author states "we have hard evidence" but then stops short of specifying what the evidence is. What is this "hard evidence" that the witnesses refer to? Did they witness the shootout? The witness made a conclusory statement, and you cannot assert there was "hard evidence" without identifying what that evidence actually consists of.
  
  Do you not understand what a stop-and-frisk is? First, with the evidence presented, there was no reasonable suspicion at all. Secondly, they were patted down for weapons, which resulted in nothing, and then searched further without probable cause. In your own argument, you have now admitted there was no probable cause. Your misconception of how a stop-and-frisk works has rendered your entire argument moot.

---

• Sincerely,
  
  Izaak Scott
  Assured Services
  Managing Attorney, Assured Law
  Bluff Tower, 72 Bay City Avenue

- - - - -

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

A decision was reached in the above case on the 22nd day of January, 2025.

The court denies the defense's motion for involuntary dismissal.

• The role of the judiciary at this stage in the court case is to assess the merits of the charges and motions presented, ensuring that sufficient probable cause exists to proceed to trial. This assessment requires viewing the evidence and arguments in the light most favorable to the prosecution. A different viewpoint would be observed at trial.
  
  Upon review, the court finds that while certain elements of the case are underdeveloped, the information presented establishes a sufficient baseline for the matter to proceed to trial. However, the court strongly urges the prosecution to address foundational gaps, particularly regarding the probable cause underlying the search of the defendant in question.
  
  The prosecution is encouraged to provide further evidence to support their case, and if necessary, reach out to file any sensitive information under seal. As it stands, the prosecution faces significant challenges that must be addressed to meet the required burden of proof at trial.
  
  So Ordered,
  
  Superior Court Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 26th of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #4: Witness statement - Captain Luka Rosselli

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: Dec 18, 2024

  Witness Information

  • Name: Luka Rosselli
    Date of Birth:
    Phone Number: #273-5722
    Occupation: Captain, Los Santos Sheriff's Department

  Witness Statement

  • During an SIB operation, we gathered solid evidence of a shootout occurring inside the Chiliad camp. Two vehicles were observed leaving the area and leaving a body behind as well as a few car parts, one of the two vehicles was a Terminus registered to Dale Lost. This vehicle was chased to Stab City while following an active trace on the driver. We followed the vehicle to Stab City, a known violent gang hangout, and directed them outside so we could safely conduct the traffic stop.
    The Terminus was occupied by three individuals: Antonio, who was driving, and Dale seated in the passenger seat. all were detained based on reasonable suspicion that they were involved in the Chiliad camp murder. Upon detaining and searching them, we discovered multiple illegal items in the possession of Dale Lost including body armor, which led us to search the vehicle and find more inside (firearms). Antonio claimed ownership of the firearms found inside the vehicle.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Luka Rosselli, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Luka Rosselli
    Captain
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 15/01/2025

  

• Exhibit 5: Bodycam footage - Investigator Louise Hoffman

  
  
  
  
  
  ((Proof of RP))

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Court Clerk
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dale Lost
#25-BT-0007

A decision was reached in the above case on the 29th day of April, 2025.

Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be involuntarily dismissed. The defendant was given ample time to interact and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As no contact has been made with the courts aside from the initial filing, this case will now be dismissed and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]