State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Locked
Alistair Vespucci
Posts: 75
Joined: 18 Apr 2020, 00:00
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Alistair Vespucci »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 315-6876
(( Defendant Discord: steakhappy))
(( Defendant Timezone: EDT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney
Image
Charging Department: LSSD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 12/AUG/2024 ##:##
Charge(s):
  • Criminal Threats
  • Assault with a deadly weapon
  • Possession of a class 1 firearm
  • Possession/Unlawful use of government equipment
Narrative:
I believe I was wrongfully charged.



I, Alistair Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 6th of September, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Image
Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Alistair Vespucci
Posts: 75
Joined: 18 Apr 2020, 00:00
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Alistair Vespucci »

I no longer wish to pursue this case.
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6420
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Prosecution and defense counsel/defendant,

    Defendant, do you understand that by dismissing the case you are giving up your right to contest the charges and are therefore pleading guilty to any charges incurred on the day in question?

    Prosecution, do you have any objections to the defendants request to dismiss?

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Malik Freeman
Posts: 49
Joined: 19 Sep 2024, 15:21
ECRP Forum Name: synnrsavior
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Malik Freeman »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,

    The prosecution has reviewed the defendant's notice that they no longer wish to contest the charges. The prosecution has no objections to the defendant's request to dismiss.


    Respectfully,

    Image
    Malik Freeman
    Junior Prosecutor
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 494-7867 — [email protected]
Image
Alistair Vespucci
Posts: 75
Joined: 18 Apr 2020, 00:00
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Alistair Vespucci »

I understand.
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6420
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

A decision was reached in the above case on the 3rd day of December, 2024.


The defense's Motion for Involuntary Dismissal is hereby granted. The disputed charge(s) will remain on the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.

Respectfully,

Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest