#25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

[Alistair Vespucci]

Defendant Name: Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 315-6876
(( Defendant Discord: steakhappy))
(( Defendant Timezone: EST))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: SAJB

Date & Time of Incident(s): 13/SEP/2024 22:20
Charge(s):

• Felony Contempt of Court
• Forgery

Narrative:
I was wrongfully charged.

---

I, Alistair Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Antonio McFornell]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 28th of September, 2024.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Appeals Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE APPEALS COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

Alistair Vespucci v. State of San Andreas
#24-AP-0009

A decision was reached in the above case on the 14th day of December, 2024.

The court was informed by the Justice who placed the charge that they are retiring from the legal profession. The Appeals Court requires that paperwork be submitted on the pertaining docket when an individual is charged with contempt of court. Unfortunately, no notice was filed by the assigned judge. Therefore the disputed charge of GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court will be removed from the record of the defendant due to a judiciary failure to follow proper procedure. Thank you to all involved for your patience.

The plaintiff should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $17,000 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

So ordered,

Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-BT-0036

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-BT-0036

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 20th of May, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Prosecutor's Office warrant report - Alistair Vespucci, 13/SEP/2024

  
  

  Prosecutor Name: Terence Williams
  Prosecutor Rank: Acting Attorney General

  
  

  Defendant Name: Alistair Vespucci
  Defendant Phone: 3156876

  
  

  Date & Time: 12/SEP/2024 0128
  Crimes Alleged:

  1. GF12 - Forgery or Counterfeiting of a Government Employee
  2. GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court

  
  Narrative:
  

  Email chain

  -------- Original Message --------
  Subject: Re: Plea Agreement - #24-CM-0062
  Date: 13 Sep 2024 21:53
  From: Terence Williams
  To: Antonio McFornell
  

  

  

  
  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Prosecution Division
  "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  ---

  • Justice McFornell,
    
    I can with the greatest certainty state that no plea deal has been provided by the Prosecution to the defendant concerning the mentioned case. The plea deal attached below is a sorry attempt at deceiving the court by forging an official document and my signature.
    

    ---

    Regards,
    
    Terence Williams
    Acting Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

  

  

  

  
  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Superior Court of San Andreas
  "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  ---

  • Attorney General Williams,
    
    I am going through my pending work and I received this plea agreement from Alistair Vespucci. Particularly I am concerned because of two reasons:
    1. The charges proposed and the new charges after the plea bargain seem distinctively different. Is it because the prosecution has very weak or little to no evidence?
    2. Also, it is regular procedure for the Prosecution to present plea deals usually, since this is a prerogative that is afforded to the Office of the Attorney General. The other case is the defense presenting them, after they've been already signed by the Prosecution. However in this case Mr. Vespucci is self-representing. I would feel more comfortable if the e-mail/proposition came from you.
    
    With this being said, could you perhaps fill me in a bit in regards to this plea agreement and how it came to be?
    
    Best regards,
    
    
    Associate Justice
    Supreme Court of San Andreas
    Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

  

  Your honor,
  
  Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
  
  
  
  
  

  Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
  
  IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
  FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS

  
  

  ---

  
  

  • Docket Number:
    #24-CM-0062
    Date Filed:
    DD/MMM/YYYY
    Violations:
    VF01 - Evading an Officer
    GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
    Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
    VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
    State of San Andreas
    
    v.
    
    Alistair Vespucci

  
  

  ---

  PLEA AGREEMENT

  ---

  
  

  • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
    
    1. Current Charges
       1. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
    2. Former Charges
       The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
       1. VF01 - Evading an Officer
       2. GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
       3. Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
       4. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
    3. General Provisions
       • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
    4. Waiver of Rights
       • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
         
         This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
         
         By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.
    
    
    
    Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
    
    
    Alistair Vespucci
    Alistair Vespucci
    Defendant
    Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
    
    REPLACE TEXT HERE
    Honorable [Judge's Name]
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Former Associate Justice Antonio McFornell

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: Unsure
    Incident Date: The events in question took place between the 11th and 13th of September, 2024.

  Witness Information

  • Name: Antonio McFornell
    Occupation: Associate Justice, Supreme Court of San Andreas

  Witness Statement

  • On the 11th of September I received a signed plea deal from Alistair Vespucci's government e-mail, which you can find attached below:
    Spoiler

    Your honor,
    
    Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
    
    
    
    
    

    Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
    
    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
    FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS

    
    

    ---

    
    

    • Docket Number:
      #24-CM-0062
      Date Filed:
      DD/MMM/YYYY
      Violations:
      VF01 - Evading an Officer
      GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
      Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
      VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
      State of San Andreas
      
      v.
      
      Alistair Vespucci

    
    

    ---

    PLEA AGREEMENT

    ---

    
    

    • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
      
      1. Current Charges
         1. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
      2. Former Charges
         The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
         1. VF01 - Evading an Officer
         2. GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
         3. Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
         4. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
      3. General Provisions
         • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
      4. Waiver of Rights
         • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
           
           This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
           
           By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.
      
      
      
      Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
      
      
      Alistair Vespucci
      Alistair Vespucci
      Defendant
      Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
      
      REPLACE TEXT HERE
      Honorable [Judge's Name]
      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY

    
    I sat down on the 13th to process the plea agreement. It is procedure within the Judicial Branch that the prosecution reaches out to the judge to present the plea deal, given that plea agreements are within prosecutorial discretion. Since I received it from Mr. Vespucci, I forwarded it to Terry Williams as it had his alleged signature. Shortly after sending an e-mail to make sure everything was in order so that I could process the plea deal (find e-mail attached) and have some concerns answered. After that, Terry Williams reached out to me in person.
    Email sent to the prosecution

    

    

    
    
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Superior Court of San Andreas
    "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

    ---

    • Attorney General Williams,
      
      I am going through my pending work and I received this plea agreement from Alistair Vespucci. Particularly I am concerned because of two reasons:
      1. The charges proposed and the new charges after the plea bargain seem distinctively different. Is it because the prosecution has very weak or little to no evidence?
      2. Also, it is regular procedure for the Prosecution to present plea deals usually, since this is a prerogative that is afforded to the Office of the Attorney General. The other case is the defense presenting them, after they've been already signed by the Prosecution. However in this case Mr. Vespucci is self-representing. I would feel more comfortable if the e-mail/proposition came from you.
      
      With this being said, could you perhaps fill me in a bit in regards to this plea agreement and how it came to be?
      
      Best regards,
      
      
      Associate Justice
      Supreme Court of San Andreas
      Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      (909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

    

    Your honor,
    
    Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
    
    
    
    
    

    Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
    
    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
    FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS

    
    

    ---

    
    

    • Docket Number:
      #24-CM-0062
      Date Filed:
      DD/MMM/YYYY
      Violations:
      VF01 - Evading an Officer
      GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
      Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
      VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
      State of San Andreas
      
      v.
      
      Alistair Vespucci

    
    

    ---

    PLEA AGREEMENT

    ---

    
    

    • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
      
      1. Current Charges
         1. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
      2. Former Charges
         The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
         1. VF01 - Evading an Officer
         2. GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
         3. Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
         4. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
      3. General Provisions
         • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
      4. Waiver of Rights
         • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
           
           This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
           
           By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.
      
      
      
      Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
      
      
      Alistair Vespucci
      Alistair Vespucci
      Defendant
      Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
      
      REPLACE TEXT HERE
      Honorable [Judge's Name]
      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY

    After meeting with me, Mr. Williams affirmed to me that the signature was not his and that it was forged as he did not fill a plea agreement of such nature. I requested him to also inform me of this through e-mail to keep a paper trail of such circumstance and later on proceeded to file the charges against Alistair Vespucci for forging the signature of AG Williams and then presenting it to the Court as an official document, not only lying in the process but also interfering with an ongoing case.
    Terry Williams email

    

    

    
    
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Prosecution Division
    "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

    ---

    • Justice McFornell,
      
      I can with the greatest certainty state that no plea deal has been provided by the Prosecution to the defendant concerning the mentioned case. The plea deal attached below is a sorry attempt at deceiving the court by forging an official document and my signature.
      

      ---

      Regards,
      
      Terence Williams
      Acting Attorney General
      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

    

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Antonio McFornell, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Antonio McFornell
    Associate Justice
    Supreme Court of San Andreas
    
    Date: 20/SEP/2024

  

• Exhibit #3: Attorney General Williams & Justice McFornell email chain

  -------- Original Message --------
  Subject: Re: Plea Agreement - #24-CM-0062
  Date: 13 Sep 2024 21:53
  From: Terence Williams
  To: Antonio McFornell
  

  

  

  
  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Prosecution Division
  "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  ---

  • Justice McFornell,
    
    I can with the greatest certainty state that no plea deal has been provided by the Prosecution to the defendant concerning the mentioned case. The plea deal attached below is a sorry attempt at deceiving the court by forging an official document and my signature.
    

    ---

    Regards,
    
    Terence Williams
    Acting Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

  

  

  

  
  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Superior Court of San Andreas
  "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  ---

  • Attorney General Williams,
    
    I am going through my pending work and I received this plea agreement from Alistair Vespucci. Particularly I am concerned because of two reasons:
    1. The charges proposed and the new charges after the plea bargain seem distinctively different. Is it because the prosecution has very weak or little to no evidence?
    2. Also, it is regular procedure for the Prosecution to present plea deals usually, since this is a prerogative that is afforded to the Office of the Attorney General. The other case is the defense presenting them, after they've been already signed by the Prosecution. However in this case Mr. Vespucci is self-representing. I would feel more comfortable if the e-mail/proposition came from you.
    
    With this being said, could you perhaps fill me in a bit in regards to this plea agreement and how it came to be?
    
    Best regards,
    
    
    Associate Justice
    Supreme Court of San Andreas
    Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

  

  Your honor,
  
  Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
  
  
  
  
  

  Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
  
  IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
  FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS

  
  

  ---

  
  

  • Docket Number:
    #24-CM-0062
    Date Filed:
    DD/MMM/YYYY
    Violations:
    VF01 - Evading an Officer
    GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
    Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
    VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
    State of San Andreas
    
    v.
    
    Alistair Vespucci

  
  

  ---

  PLEA AGREEMENT

  ---

  
  

  • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
    
    1. Current Charges
       1. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
    2. Former Charges
       The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
       1. VF01 - Evading an Officer
       2. GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
       3. Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
       4. VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
    3. General Provisions
       • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
    4. Waiver of Rights
       • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
         
         This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
         
         By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.
    
    
    
    Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
    
    
    Alistair Vespucci
    Alistair Vespucci
    Defendant
    Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
    
    REPLACE TEXT HERE
    Honorable [Judge's Name]
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Daniel Carmello]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-BT-0036

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 8th of July, 2025.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Traveling Defendant
  • Detailed Explanation: The defendant is out of town for the next thirty (30) days. The defense asks that the court allow the defendant to return before continuing with this case.

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 313 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-BT-0036

A decision was reached in the above case on the 11th day of July, 2025.

The court will be denying the motion for continuance and dismissing the case as the defendant's passport back into San Andreas has been revoked.

((The defendant is no longer a part of the community.))

Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]