State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Locked
User avatar
Pousey Nixon
Posts: 46
Joined: 27 May 2021, 23:45
ECRP Forum Name: Anakin Nixon
Discord:

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Pousey Nixon »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Anakin Nixon
Defendant Phone: 477-4505
(( Defendant Discord: datsquirrel ))
(( Defendant Timezone: gmt-6 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Image
Charging Department: SD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 09/09/2024 02:45
Charge(s):
  • Reckless Op
Narrative:
I accidentally hit a vehicle in the middle of the road on the right side of the road in my lane and got arrested for reckless op, when I pulled over was compliant and everything, and they said I intentionally hit the vehicle. The arresting officer 26636 was extremely rude and had no intentions of listening to what I had to say



I, Anakin Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 28th of September, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Image
Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6432
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 1st day of October, 2024.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 7 days.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes to dispute more than just misdemeanor charges or desires a more in-depth examination of the case, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Image
Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Jack Swisswood
Posts: 61
Joined: 02 Sep 2024, 20:08
ECRP Forum Name: FaxTurtle
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Jack Swisswood »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon


A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 1st of October, 2024.


The State of San Andreas by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #1: Arrest Report
    Image
    ARREST REPORT
    MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT 1 DETAILS


    • Full Name: Anakin Nixon
      Telephone Number: 4774505
      Licenses Suspended: Yes
      • Driver
      • Trucker

      Charges:
      • VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle


      Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :


    VEHICLES INVOLVED
    • Vehicle A:


    DEPUTY DETAILS
    • Full Name: Max Thompson
      Badge Number: 26636
      Callsign: 11-R-40


    INCIDENT DETAILS
    • Date of Arrest: 2024-09-08
      Deputies Involved: Max Thompson

      Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
      • On the above date, Deputy Max Thompson witnessed an individual drive a vehicle into a terminus that was stationary in the road and ramp the stationary vehicle off his car. This was seen as intentional as the individual had previously rammed the same vehicle moments before that. The stationary vehicle was occupied and could have caused an injury to the driver. Deputy Thompson pulled over the vehicle and initiated a traffic stop where the individual was arrested for reckless driving.

    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Location of Evidence Locker: Paleto Station


    ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
    Image


    Image
    Exhibit #2: Official Witness Statement - Deputy Sheriff III Max Thompson
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Case Number: [Case Number]
      Incident Date: 08/SEP/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Max Thompson
      Date of Birth: 20/DEC/2000
      Phone Number: [###-####]
      Occupation: Deputy Sheriff
    Witness Statement
    • On the date listed on the arrest report, I had noticed an individual in a pink car with blue rims in the middle of the street hitting a brown/tan in color head on at first. I decided to stick around and see how the situation played out. Thats when I witnessed the Pink car seemingly back up and proceed to accelerate at the terminus at full speed in an attempt to get the terminus to ramp off the pink vehicle. As this could have injured the driver of either vehicle. I proceeded to initiate a traffic stop on the pink vehicle and conducted a VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle arrest. The suspect being Anakin Nixon as identified through his license.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Max Thompson, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      Max Thompson
      Deputy Sheriff III
      Los Santos County Sheriffs Department

      Date: 01/OCT/2024
    Image

Image
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 544-4149 — [email protected]
    Image
    User avatar
    Hope Kant
    Judicial Branch
    Posts: 6432
    Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
    ECRP Forum Name:
    Discord:

    SAJB Awards

    Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

    Post by Hope Kant »

    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Docket Notice

    "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

    • Parties,

      This is to serve as a notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on Mondays and Tuesdays. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here.

      Respectfully,

      Image
      Superior Court Judge
      Branch Administrator

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      505-9925 — [email protected]
    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    Hope Kant
    Judicial Branch
    Posts: 6432
    Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
    ECRP Forum Name:
    Discord:

    SAJB Awards

    Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

    Post by Hope Kant »

    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Docket Notice

    "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

    • Parties,

      This is to serve as a second notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on Mondays and Tuesdays. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant 3 notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

      Respectfully,

      Image
      Superior Court Judge
      Branch Administrator

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      505-9925 — [email protected]
    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    Hope Kant
    Judicial Branch
    Posts: 6432
    Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
    ECRP Forum Name:
    Discord:

    SAJB Awards

    Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

    Post by Hope Kant »

    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Docket Notice

    "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

    • Parties,

      This is to serve as a third and final notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on Mondays and Tuesdays. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant 3 notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

      Respectfully,

      Image
      Superior Court Judge
      Branch Administrator

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      505-9925 — [email protected]
    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    Hope Kant
    Judicial Branch
    Posts: 6432
    Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
    ECRP Forum Name:
    Discord:

    SAJB Awards

    Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

    Post by Hope Kant »

    Image


    San Andreas Judicial Branch

    Superior Court of San Andreas
    "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

    COURT DECISION


    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

    State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

    A decision was reached in the above case on the 25th day of November, 2024.


    Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be involuntarily dismissed. The defendant was given ample time to interact and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As no contact has been made with the courts aside from the initial filing, this case will now be dismissed and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.


    Respectfully,

    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
    Image
    Image
    Locked

    Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests