State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Locked
Jinx Bridge
Posts: 18
Joined: 22 Mar 2023, 19:12
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Jinx Bridge »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Jinx Bridge
Defendant Phone: 220-4960
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: dredhawk ))
Requested Attorney: Can Shaun Harper come out of retirement? Al Triton if not
Image
Charging Department: SD DOC PD? Unsure as SD left DOC to handle the scene and showed up at DOC and just started adding charges randomly from officers uninvolved in the situation at all.
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 17/JUNE/2024
Charge(s):
  • evading
  • felony public endangerment
  • class 1 firearm
  • attempted murder of a GOV
  • Illegal Weapon Mods
Narrative:
My Miranda rights were never read to me. Nor were my charges read to me. I was never even told I was under arrest I was never operating a land or marine vehicle at any point during this altercation and interaction to indicate evading.



I, Jinx Bridge, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Last edited by Jinx Bridge on 19 Jun 2024, 01:38, edited 1 time in total.
Claire Allen
Posts: 93
Joined: 17 Apr 2023, 20:52
ECRP Forum Name: Eliza
Discord:

SADOC Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge

Post by Claire Allen »

I respectfully request to be designated as a co-defendant in this matter. I have been charged with the same offenses arising from the same set of circumstances, with the exception of illegal weapon modifications, to the best of my knowledge. Should it be determined that I have indeed been charged with the offense of illegal weapon modifications, I hereby express my intention to appeal that charge as well.
Chad Rapkov
Posts: 27
Joined: 02 Apr 2021, 02:52
ECRP Forum Name: Netlok
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge

Post by Chad Rapkov »

I also wish to be listed as a co-defendant on this matter as I was charged with similar charges due to the same incident.
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 3101
Joined: 21 May 2021, 03:11
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • To whom it may concern,

    Your submission to the Superior Court of San Andreas has been received. As this case involves multiple defendants, the court will require formal confirmation from any co-defendants through the format attached below.
    Live Form
    Image
    Image
    Defendant Name: Firstname Lastname
    Defendant Phone: ###-####
    Defendant Address: HERE
    (( Defendant Discord: HERE ))
    Image
    Supplementary Narrative:
    HERE



    I, Firstname Lastname, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
    Image
    Formatting

    Code: Select all

    [img]https://i.imgur.com/hq6d7UW.png[/img]
    [img]https://i.imgur.com/6h9z9Jh.png[/img]
    [divbox=antiquewhite]
    [b]Defendant Name:[/b] Firstname Lastname
    [b]Defendant Phone:[/b] ###-####
    [b]Defendant Address:[/b] HERE
    [b][color=#0040FF](([/color] Defendant Discord:[/b] HERE [color=#0040FF][b]))[/b][/color]
    [/divbox]
    
    [img]https://i.imgur.com/wjDADzN.png[/img]
    [divbox=antiquewhite]
    [b]Supplementary Narrative:[/b]
    HERE
    
    
    
    [hr][/hr]
    I, [b]Firstname Lastname[/b], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. [b][color=#0000FF](([/color][/b] I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. [b][color=#0000FF]))[/color][/b]
    [/divbox][img]https://i.imgur.com/LdlyeRK.png[/img]
    As will be indicated in the future Notice of Receipt: the defendants are further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Claire Allen
Posts: 93
Joined: 17 Apr 2023, 20:52
ECRP Forum Name: Eliza
Discord:

SADOC Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Claire Allen »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Claire Allen
Defendant Phone: 363-2048
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: DontSniffSugar ))
Image
Supplementary Narrative:
I believe I was falsely charged and arrested and I wish to appeal my charges.



I, Claire Allen, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Claire Allen
Posts: 93
Joined: 17 Apr 2023, 20:52
ECRP Forum Name: Eliza
Discord:

SADOC Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Claire Allen »

I no longer wish to pursue this.
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Mason,

    The Prosecution would like to ask for a ruling on the defendant(s) in this case. It has been a considerable amount of time since the court asked for confirmation from other defendants wishing to partake in this case. So far, only one (1) other defendant has declared their intention to join this case, though they have now rescinded that declaration. The Prosecution would like clarification so that we can better continue our investigation into this case.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Acting Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 22nd of June, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

The receipt-date of this case will be the 22nd of June, and will consider a single defendant -Jinx Bridge-.


Image
Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Jinx Bridge
Posts: 18
Joined: 22 Mar 2023, 19:12
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Jinx Bridge »

I no longer wish to pursue this. I'll pursue other avenues due to the corrupt nature and misinformation that will come to be highlighted by the LSSD who had officers never present on scene make arrest reports and file charges inside of SADOC. I am not guilty of any charges placed and I know in my heart that's true. If JB wishes to pursue actually making a change you should investigate the corrupt officers inside the LSPD and LSSD. I.E. Francesca from the LSSD who came to DOC after never being present on scene and added "illegal weapon modifications" after never even finding out I had a gun as again. She was never on scene. Drop this court case and pursue the corrupt individuals in your brother departments.
Shaun Harper
Posts: 1091
Joined: 08 Sep 2022, 18:33
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Jinx Bridge et al.

A decision was reached in the above case on the 25th day of August, 2024.


Due to the defendant no longer wishing to pursue the case, this case is hereby dismissed and archived.

The charges will remain on the defendants record.

Respectfully,

Image
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests