#24-CM-0044, State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

Locked
Johnathan Schmidt
Posts: 2
Joined: 12 Nov 2023, 13:41
ECRP Forum Name: Demonmit1
Discord:

#24-CM-0044, State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

Post by Johnathan Schmidt »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Johnathan Schmidt
Defendant Phone: N/A
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: @Demonmit1 ))
Requested Attorney: N/A if none
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 28/MAR/2024 10:00
Charge(s):
  • Face Concealment (b)
    Battery of a Gov Employee
    Resisting Arrest
    Failure to Identify
Narrative:
I was pulled over for speeding, attacked by two officers, and then given these trumped up false charges. I wish to dispute them.



I, Johnathan Schmidt, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 2nd of April, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Image
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0044, State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt
#24-CM-0044

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 16th day of July, 2024.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt is hereby activated by this Court under #24-CM-0044.

During the preparation phase, the Prosecution and the Defendant reached a plea agreement based on efforts advanced by the Judicial Branch to propose alternative procedures related to cases of non-violent crimes. As such, this case will not require a trial and a no-contest plea will be accepted by this Court as determined in the plea agreement.

So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0044, State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Document 1 | Filed 16/JUL/2024 | Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS



  • Docket Number:
    #24-CM-0044
    Date Filed:
    16/JUL/2024
    Violations:
    GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    GM04 - Resisting Arrest
    GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
    VC02 - Speeding 2nd Degree
    GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
    State of San Andreas

    v.

    Johnathan Schmidt


PLEA AGREEMENT


  • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt; Prosecuting Attorney Mikhail Garin, Public Defense Attorney HERE, and the defendant, Johnathan Schmidt, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
    1. Current Charges
      1. GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      2. GM04 - Resisting Arrest
      3. GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
      4. VC02 - Speeding 2nd Degree
      5. GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
    2. General Provisions
      • The defendant agrees to plead no contest to the Current Charges outlined in Section I.
        The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
        The State will pay the defendant $19,975 for time served + fines.
    3. Waiver of Rights
      • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.

        This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.

        By signing this document, the defendant is pleading no contest to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.


    Mikhail Garin
    Prosecutor Mikhail Garin
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 15/JULY/2024


    Public Defense Attorney Izaak Scott
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 15/JULY/2024

    Johnathan Schmidt
    Johnathan Schmidt
    Defendant
    Date Signed: 15/JULY/2024

    Tony McFornell
    Honorable Antonio McFornell
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 16/JUL/2024

Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0044, State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt
#24-CM-0044

A decision was reached in the above case on the 16th day of July, 2024.


The case of #24-CM-0044, State of San Andreas v. Johnathan Schmidt has been resolved.

A Plea Agreement has been filed by the Prosecution and has been accepted by the court. Within the agreement, the defendant pled no contest to the charges of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), GM04 - Resisting Arrest, GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee, VC02 - Speeding 2nd Degree, GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), I find the defendant, Johnathan Schmidt, guilty.
  • On the count of GM04 - Resisting Arrest, I find the defendant, Johnathan Schmidt, guilty.
  • On the count of GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee, I find the defendant, Johnathan Schmidt, guilty.
  • On the count of VC02 - Speeding 2nd Degree, I find the defendant, Johnathan Schmidt, guilty.
  • On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Johnathan Schmidt, guilty.


The defendant shall be entitled to compensation in the amount of $19,975. This compensation can be handled at Rockford Hills City Hall by a qualified judge.

So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests