#26-BT-0053, State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall

Locked
User avatar
Audrey Hartwell
Posts: 92
Joined: 02 Oct 2024, 16:19
ECRP Forum Name: Harley
Discord:

#26-BT-0053, State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall

Post by Audrey Hartwell »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Waldo Marshall
Defendant Phone: 493-3725
(( Defendant Discord: billybluewater))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney - Rockford Law
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 09/MAY/2026 - 20:41:21
Charge(s):
  • VF01 - Evading an Officer
Narrative:
My client believes they are not guilty



I, Audrey Hartwell, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6543
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall
#26-BT-0053

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 23rd day of May, 2026.


The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,

Image
Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6543
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #26-BT-0053, State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall
#26-BT-0053

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 23rd day of May, 2026.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,

Image
Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Rowin Lawson
Judicial Branch
Posts: 838
Joined: 14 Jan 2024, 19:03
ECRP Forum Name: akcoffeeman
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #26-BT-0053, State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall

Post by Rowin Lawson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall
#26-BT-0053

A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice was filed in the above case on the 1st day of June, 2026.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;


  • Reasoning: After conferring with the Arresting department, the request has been made to move forward with dropping charges.




Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6543
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #26-BT-0053, State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall
#26-BT-0053

A decision was reached in the above case on the 5th day of June, 2026.


The disputed charge(s) of VF01 - Evading an Officer will be removed from the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.

The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $61,500 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

Respectfully,

Image
Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Bench Trials”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest