#26-BT-0041 State of San Andreas vs. Swat Nixon

Post Reply
Swat Nixon
Posts: 28
Joined: 11 Jan 2020, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

#26-BT-0041 State of San Andreas vs. Swat Nixon

Post by Swat Nixon »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Swat Nixon
Defendant Phone: 216-4573
(( Defendant Discord: swatnixon ))
(( Defendant Timezone: gmt-6 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 19/04/2026 NA
Charge(s):
  • Illegal firearm class 1 2 and 3, Illegal narcotics schedule 1 2 and 3, weapon attachments, illegal body armor
Narrative:
I was driving recklessly down a street when i accidentally crashed into a traffic stop, the officers told me to get out guns drawn, i fled the scene, no id shown and my face was covered, I was not being pursued or followed and had nothing illegal on me and I pull up to my house and see a d5 sitting there with 2 obvious officers, I walk around a bit see if there going to do anything to which they do not so i proceed inside, when i come outside there's a cul-de-sac full of cops there to arrest me, they proceed to raid my house stating they were actively pursuing me and i ran inside when they didn't pursue me at all and entrapped me to go into my house, also raiding my house they took radios, gps, crates, waters, bags, and more of which didn't even contain any illegal items, regardless if the claim of the raid is found to be accurate I was robbed by PD. If they were pursuing me the 2 officers in the car would've tried to stop me instead they sat there and waited for no reason, they just wanted a reason to go inside an unlawful one.


















I, Swat Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
The One and Only,

Image
User avatar
Joseph Horton
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1221
Joined: 28 Apr 2025, 11:25
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas vs. Swat Nixon

Post by Joseph Horton »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-BT-0041

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 25th day of April, 2026.


The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,

Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Joseph Horton
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1221
Joined: 28 Apr 2025, 11:25
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas vs. Swat Nixon

Post by Joseph Horton »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-BT-0041

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 25th day of April, 2026.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,

Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Image
Post Reply

Return to “SAJB - Criminal Court”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest