#26-CM-0003 State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks

[DeAndre Stacks]

Defendant Name: Deandre Stacks
Defendant Phone: 336 3034
(( Defendant Discord: realAlex ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT+2 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation

Charging Department: LSSD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 16/JAN/2026
Charge(s):

• WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications

Narrative:
I believe I was wrongfully charged.

---

I, Deandre Stacks, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 23rd day of January, 2026.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availablity. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 23rd day of January, 2026.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availablity. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
26-BT-#0011

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 24th day of January, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Deandre Stacks arrest report LSSD

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Deandre Stacks
    Telephone Number: 3363033
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
    • WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  • Vehicle A: Red/Black, Zentorno, LP - 88, VIN - EPY1B0ZAZT4WCA000, RO - Deandre Stacks

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: James Sharpe
    Badge Number: 28048
    Callsign: 228A

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2026-01-16
    Deputies Involved: Arnold Rimmer, Reggie Maximin
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • We had gained the knowledge that members of OTF were waiting for a illegal shipment. We had found the area where we believed the shipment would land. We then saw Mr. Stacks and other members of OTF with heavy weaponry visible. I then pulled him over and conducted a 10-66 with Arnold Rimmer where Mr. Stacks threw his keys out of the window and gave up.
      
      Upon searching the vehicle we found a Heavy Rifle in the car. He was then arrested by myself and transported to DOC.

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
    Exhibit A: Serial number: 1741499419628; Weapon: Heavy Rifle;
    
    Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)

    

    ---

  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  J.Sharpe
  

  ---

  

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court will move onto scheduling this trial. If Defense or Prosecution wishes to submit any further Motions, that is still possible up until Trial has started, though with the discretion of the presiding judge.
  
  If you are intending to do so, please inform the Court within three (3) days. If you need additional time, please file a Motion for Continuance.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Superior Court Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 24th day of January, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[DeAndre Stacks]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION TO SUPPRESS

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;

• Exhibit 1: Deandre Stacks arrest report, LSSD
  Requested Evidence to Suppress:

  We had gained the knowledge that members of OTF were waiting for a illegal shipment. We had found the area where we believed the shipment would land. We then saw Mr. Stacks and other members of OTF with heavy weaponry visible. I then pulled him over and conducted a 10-66 with Arnold Rimmer where Mr. Stacks threw his keys out of the window and gave up.
  
  Upon searching the vehicle we found a Heavy Rifle in the car. He was then arrested by myself and transported to DOC.

  • Detailed Reasoning: Gained the knowledge how? as of right now this is hearsay, speculation, and more likely to be prejudicial than probative without foundation. Which area? Why was that area believed the alleged shipment would arrive there? hearsay, speculative and more likely to be prejudicial than probative without foundation. Who is "We"? without a definitive answer this is hearsay. there was no evidence submitted to indicate that Mr. Stacks is a member of OTF, therefore, this is speculative, and more likely to be prejudicial than probative.

DeAndre Stacks
[email protected]

[DeAndre Stacks]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

SUBPOENA REQUEST

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

A Subpoena Request was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, respectfully requests the issuance of a subpoena for the following documents and/or testimony:

• Documents/Information Requested: Impound Report / Witness Testimony regarding Impound of suspect's vehicle
  • Purpose/Reasoning for Subpoena: The prosecution alleges through their arrest report that heavy weapons were found in Mr. Stacks' vehicle, which would warrant its impound after being taken in police custody. Mr. Stacks intends to show that the Sheriff's Department failed to secure his vehicle and instead left it abandoned. The impound report or lack thereof would assist in proving that the Sheriff's Department made procedural mistakes during this situation, and therefore, may have mistaken about what they found in the vehicle, or about their intelligence from an unknown source, unknown location and without foundation. I believe that this evidence would be probative in this case towards the Sheriff's Department neglect and poor service during their interaction with Mr. Stacks.

DeAndre Stacks
[email protected]

[DeAndre Stacks]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Requested Venue: Normal Trial
  • Detailed Explanation: There is a great deal of missing information and disagreements about the facts of the situation; it is not simply a matter of legal determination but evidence review and many more submissions would be required for the warrant-less search of Mr. Stacks. I believe it is in the best interest of the public that a thorough and complete investigation take place in-person and in open court.

DeAndre Stacks
[email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court acknowledges the Motions submitted by the Defense.
  
  Defense, before proceeding with the other Motions, the Court wants to confirm your understanding of the Bench Trial system, as you are self-representing. You have stated that you wish for the case to proceed to an in-person trial at open court, as well as to review the evidence and submissions.
  
  As per the Self Representation Database for Bench Trials, your case would receive an in-person trial at Open Court, which allows for both Prosecution and Defense to provide their Case-in-Chief, as well as cross-examination and closing arguments.
  
  There are differences between a Bench Trial and Formal Criminal Trials; the differences are not based on the points you have raised. Ultimately, it is your right and your decision to choose a Formal Criminal Trial if you so wish; the Court wants to ensure this decision is made with an understanding of the system.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Superior Court Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

DEFENSE MOTIONS REBUTTAL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
26-BT-#0011

The Prosecutions Motions Rebuttal was filed in the above case on the 25th day of January, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motions Rebuttal;

The prosecution Would first like to address the Motion for Suppression submitted by the defense. The arguments made by the defense in their motion cover grounds that are better argued in court rather than in a suppression. The prosecution requests that the suppression be dismissed. It is understandable that the Defense may have not read the most recent SAJB announcement on the "Clarification for motion to suppress". That being said, the defendant chose to self-represent and therefor by declining legal counsel he should be held to the same standard of an appointed defense attorney.

In regard to the Subpoena request, the prosecution fails to see how the request made by the defendant has any relevance in the case. The request made by the defense attempts to make a connection between the impounding of the vehicle the defendant was arrested in and the evidence collected. The defense claims that the evidence may have been misrepresented due to the vehicle allegedly not being impounded. These two points are separate and have no relevance to each other. In review of the arrest report, officers searched the vehicle on scene and the vehicle being or not being in impound have no relevance to what was found on scene.

To finally address the Motion for change of venue, the prosecution asserts that this case is in fact a candidate for summary judgment. As such the prosecution has attached a Motion for summary judgment.

► Show Spoiler

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

A Motion for Summary Judgement was filed in the above case on the 25th day of January, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Summary Judgement, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution files this motion for summary judgment based on the weight of evidence provided by the Prosecution. With the arrest report presented, the Prosecution has met the standard in regard to the burden of proof. If the court takes into account, the motion for suppression and agrees that all the evidence the defendant requested to be suppressed is suppressed, the Prosecution still meets the burden of proof. Due to these facts the only arguments being made are in regard to the interpretation of the law. It is due to these facts that the prosecution moves for summary judgment.

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Defense, could you please confirm your intention for the Motion for Change of Venue, following the previous Docket Notice from the Court?
  
  This will adjust how the Court handles the prior two Motions, so this matter needs to be resolved first.
  
  At this time, the Court is also rescinding the prior Notice of Scheduling until the matters on the Docket are resolved.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[DeAndre Stacks]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0011

I, the defendant, having fully understood the explanation provided by Your Honor, still wish to proceed with the change of venue.



DeAndre Stacks
[email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-CM-0003

A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of February, 2026.

The Court will accept the Defendant's Motion for Change of Venue.

As Discovery has already been submitted to the Docket, the Court will immediately activate this case under 26-CM-0003.

The Court currently acknowledges the following motions:

• Prosecution: Motion for Discovery
• Defense: Motion to Suppress
• Defense: Subpoena Request

Prosecution and Defense, you will now have seven (7) days to file any additional Motions to be heard at the Motions Hearing.
If either party needs more time, please file a Motion for Continuance.

Prosecution, if you could please assist the Court by re-filing your Motion for Summary Judgement in its own submission, that would help greatly.

Both parties are reminded that, as there will be a Motions hearing, rebuttals and arguments are to be reserved for the hearing itself.

So Ordered,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-CM-0003

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 16th day of February, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a Motions Hearing on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time for the Motions Hearing take place and post a Notice of Motions Hearing informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Interested parties,
  
  The Court has removed the comment from the uninvolved party, Mr. Tom Mathers, on the docket. Parties that are not involved should not comment on the docket, or they may face a contempt of court charge.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Given the lack of shared availability, the Court will re-try the scheduling notice with a wider availability range.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-CM-0003

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 28th day of February, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a Motions Hearing on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time for the Motions Hearing take place and post a Notice of Motions Hearing informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• All Parties,
  
  The Prosecution has submitted its availability.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Rowin Lawson
  Deputy Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  451-9939 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULED DATE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-CM-0003

A Motions Hearing date was set on the above case on the 1st day of March, 2026.

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling application, this Motions Hearing shall take place at 17:00 on 8th day of March, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Courtroom no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the Motions Hearing, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0003

A Motion for Summary Judgement was filed in the above case on the 8th day of March, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Summary Judgement, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The Prosecution submits a request for summary judgment due to the weight of the evidence that has been presented in discovery. The facts are that the defendant was seen in a vehicle with a heavy weapon. because of this, he was searched and arrested, following his arrest he and the vehicle were searched. Heavy weapons and attachments were found; thus, charges were placed. Due to the weight of the evidence, clear documentation and the defendant only contesting the charge of WM03. It appears that the defense at the least agrees with the facts presented that led up to his arrest. Unless there is an objection by the defense, The only topics up for debate is the application of the WF03 charge.

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-CM-0003

A decision was reached in the above case on the 8th day of March, 2026.

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

• Exhibit: Exhibit #1 Deandre Stacks arrest report LSSD
• Action: Accepted
• Decision:
  Entered into evidence.

---

MOTION TO SUPPRESS

---

• Exhibit: Exhibit #1 Deandre Stacks arrest report LSSD
  Quoted Statement:

  We had gained the knowledge that members of OTF were waiting for a illegal shipment.

  Objections: Lack of foundation
  Decision: Sustained, in part
  Reasoning:The Prosecution is being afforded the opportunity to resolve the foundational concerns with this exhibit, including this portion requested for suppression.
  
  If the Prosecution can resolve the foundational issues, this part will be overruled, with the relevant objections being left for trial. If the foundational issues are not resolved, the Court will sustain this objection and strike this statement.
  
  The timeframe to resolve the foundational issues is seven (7) days.

• Exhibit: Exhibit #1 Deandre Stacks arrest report LSSD
  Quoted Statement:

  We had found the area where we believed the shipment would land.

  Objections: Lack of foundation
  Decision: Sustained, in part
  Reasoning: The Prosecution is being afforded the opportunity to resolve the foundational concerns with this exhibit, including this portion requested for suppression.
  
  If the Prosecution can resolve the foundational issues, this part will be overruled, with the relevant objections being left for trial. If the foundational issues are not resolved, the Court will sustain this objection and strike this statement.
  
  The timeframe to resolve the foundational issues is seven (7) days.

• Exhibit: Exhibit #1 Deandre Stacks arrest report LSSD
  Quoted Statement:

  References to "we"

  Objections: Hearsay
  Decision: Overruled
  Reasoning: Prosecution has raised the argument that the arrest report is written from the perspective of the arresting department.
  
  Defense argues that the clarity of the exact deputies involved is missing from the arrest report, which impacts the ability to raise an effective defense.
  
  The Court finds that the wording of the arrest report in this regard is open for argument at trial, and does not meet the threshold for suppresion prior to the exhibit being entered into evidence.

• Exhibit: Exhibit #1 Deandre Stacks arrest report LSSD
  Quoted Statement:

  other members of OTF

  Objections: Speculative, Prejudicial than Probative
  Decision: Sustained
  Reasoning: Through agreement with both Prosecution and Defense, the word "other" will be struck to resolve the prejudicial aspect of this quote.

---

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

---

• A Motion for Summary Judgement was filed for this case and was rejected.
  
  Summary Judgements are only applicable when the material fact of the case is undisputed. Defense raised a material dispute to the core facts of the case, and as such, a Summary Judgement is not appropriate in this case.

---

MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS

---

• Motion: Subpoena Request
  Filed By: Defense
  Decision: Accepted
  Reasoning: This request will be treated as a Motion to Compel Discovery given the nature of the request.
  
  Defense has requested a relevant impound report and witness testimony that substantiates the argument surrounding the procedural issues made by the arresting department. Prosecution objected to this, arguing the lack of relevance.
  
  The Court accepted the Motion to Compel Discovery on the basis that a witness's testimony was already required to resolve the foundational issues raised in Exhibit #1. Any related impound report will also be compelled, if such a report exists. This will also be given the seven (7) day deadline.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-CM-0003

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 15th day of March, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an extension of one week in order to collect the requested evidence. The other deputies involved in the arrest resigned, thus complicating retrieving the requested evidence. The LSSD is actively attempting to retrieve it.

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court apologises for the delay in the response.
  
  Given the reasoning behind the Motion for Continuance, and the relatively short nature (of the original request, and the time remaining), the Court will have accepted the Motion for Continuance.
  
  The Court expects a response either way from the Prosecution by the end of Sunday, 22nd March, 2026.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks
#26-BT-0003

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 23rd day of March, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #2 Witness Statement Sheriff Rimmer

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: 26-CM-0003
    Incident Date: 16/JAN/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Arnold Rimmer
    Date of Birth: 28/MAR/1993
    Phone Number: 270-9294
    Occupation: Law Enforcement Officer

  Witness Statement

  • On January 16, 2026, I was part of an operation which led to the arrest of Deandre Stacks. While I personally did not have the initial visual on the suspect, another member of our unit, Gang Detective Amir Sultan, had 100% visual confirmation that Mr. Stacks was in possession of heavy weapons. Detective Sultan maintained continuous line of sight on the suspect from that point until we initiated the traffic stop.
    
    Based on the probable cause established by Detective Sultan's visual confirmation, I initiated and carried out a 10-66 felony stop on the suspect's vehicle. This stop occurred under the bridge of Senora Freeway, on the stretch of road between Catfish View and Grapeseed. During the execution of the stop, I personally witnessed Mr. Stacks throw his keys out of the car window and comply with all of my commands.
    
    Following the suspect's arrest, I oversaw the search of his vehicle. I can personally confirm that a weapon equipped with illegal modifications was recovered from the scene.
    
    To counter any claims of procedural negligence regarding the suspect's vehicle, I personally drove it to the Paleto Impound lot and personally processed its impound. The weapon evidence was secured and, as far as I'm aware, stored in the evidence locker at Sandy Shores Station by Deputy Sharpe.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Arnold Rimmer, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Arnold Rimmer
    Area Commander, Detectives Division
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 11/MAR/2026

  
  

• Exhibit #3 Witness Statement Sheriff Rimmer Clarification

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: 26-CM-0003
    Incident Date: 16/JAN/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Arnold Rimmer
    Date of Birth: 28/MAR/1993
    Phone Number: 270-9294
    Occupation: Law Enforcement Officer

  Witness Statement

  • In my previous statement dated March 11, 2026, I identified Detective Amir Sultan as the observing officer. Upon further review of my case knowledge, I have determined this was an error in my recollection. While I can affirm that the stop was initiated based on a 100% visual confirmation of a weapon by an LSPD GND or LSSD OSS detective involved in the operation, I cannot personally attest to the specific identity of that detective.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Arnold Rimmer, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Arnold Rimmer
    Area Commander, Detectives Division
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 22/MAR/2026

  
  

• Exhibit #4 Witness Statement Officer Maximin

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number:
    Incident Date: 16/JAN/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Reggie Maximin
    Date of Birth: 12/MAR/1997
    Phone Number: 5787604
    Occupation: Police Officer

  Witness Statement

  • 1. Location & Scene Details: The specific location of the 10-66 was on Grapeseed Ave, southbound beneath the Senora Freeway. The initiating unit Arnold Rimmer's unit, primary units included myself, Detective Mark Snow & Deputy James Sharpe (With Captain Rimmer in his unit or vice versa).
    
    2. Initiation of the Stop: I was not the officer/deputy that had spotted weapons on Mr Stacks, I believe that it would have been one of the detectives who were surveying heavy gang activity within the area, a lab if I recall correctly. My role was to provide support in the occurrence of a gun fight or necessity for additional units.
    
    3. Suspect Compliance: Mr Stacks did in fact surrender & throw his keys out of the window when instructed to, as per the 10-66 regulations.
    
    4. Discovery of the Weapon: I do recall the Heavy Rifle being full attached; suppressor, extended clip, scope & grip. As I was one of the primary units on scene, I assisted in searching/securing the vehicle on scene.
    
    5. Chain of Custody vs. Vehicle Impound: I immediately seized the Heavy Rifle as soon as the vehicle was unlocked and later handed it to Captain Rimmer before he took Stacks to DOC. As for handling the impound, I believe Captain Rimmer took it to the impound & secured the evidence then transported Mr. Stacks to the Department of Corrections. To my knowledge, nothing was left on scene whatsoever, including the original vehicle (Zentorno).

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Reggie Maximin, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Reggie Maximin
    Police Officer III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 11/MAR/2026

  
  

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]