#25-BT-0109, State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo

[Nathan Whildo]

Defendant Name: Nathan Whildo
Defendant Phone: 4041506
(( Defendant Discord: Jugzter))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT+2 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation

Charging Department: PD officers
Badgenumber : 8044 and 27189

Date & Time of Incident(s): 20/07/2025 22:34
Charge(s):

• GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
• GM04 - Resisting Arrest
• GF10 - Grand Theft
• WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm

Narrative:
I got arrested by 2 officers that accuse me of robbing an ATM still refuse to show me any prof of how they knew i did anything. They say they saw me leaving the car and that my fingerprints was in the car. My fingerprints can be from any other day in that car, how did they know when the fingerprint where put there? The cops saw me going from the car because i was watching it roll down a hill so i was curious. They refused to provide any evidence that they saw me leaving the car or even was in the car.

---

I, Nathan Whildo, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 20th day of July, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo
#25-BT-0109

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 20th day of July, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo
#25-BT-0109

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 18th of August, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Nathan Whildo, 20/JUL/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Matthew Burns
      Callsign: 3-K-30
      
      Date of Arrest: 20/JUL/2025
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Officer III Matthew Burns
      • Police Detective III Alexander Olsson
      • Police Officer II Zack Armani
      • Deputy Chief Elizabeth Sanchez
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      3-K-30 responded to a 911 call regarding an ATM System losing power and then its GPS going mobile. Upon arrival at the present GPS Location we observed a Dragur that had crashed into a tree and 2 occupants running from its location, the ATM was still attached to the rear of the Draugur with a rope.
      Officer Burns started pursuing one of the fleeing suspects as he ran into the oil fields around El Burro Heights.
      Officer Burns with the assistance of Officer Armani was able to taze the suspect as he continued attempting to flee.
      After the suspect was tased he tried a few times to run away from us again.
      Officer Burns attempted to jump onto the suspect and pin him down to which the suspect kicked him square in the groin.
      The suspect was belligerent throughout the arrest and initially attempted to resist the search of his person by Officer Burns before complying when the search was attempted for a second time.
      The suspect was found with the below items and his licenses which were used to identify him.
      Whilst Officer Burns was detaining the suspect, Detective Olsson had returned to the Dragur and searched it, finding a Mini SMG with loaded rounds inside with his fingerprints on the weapon.
      The Suspect was handed to Officer Armani who suspended his licenses and transported him to DOC.
      
      WF03 was issued for the MiniSMG
      GM04 for resisting arrest when Officers were attempting to detain/arrest him
      GF10 for the theft of the ATM
      GM02 issued for striking Officer Burns whilst resisting.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Nathan Whildo
      Phone Number: 4041506
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
      • GM04 - Resisting Arrest
      • GF10 - Grand Theft
      • GM02 - Battery
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      Exhibit B:
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Officer Matthew Burns

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 20/JUL/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Matthew Burns
    Date of Birth: 23/APR/1996
    Phone Number: REDACTED
    Occupation: Police Officer II, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • We responded to a 911 call from the ATM Company stating one of their ATMS had lost power at the GPS had started moving. Upon following the GPS with AIR-1 overhead, we observed a Dragur, facing east, that had crashed into a tree to the left side of Sustancia Roa,d appearing to have travelled down from the hilly area to the west. As we got closer, we observed 2 people fleeing from the vehicle running across Sustancia.
    
    I followed the defendant on foot whilst my partner secured the vehicle and had a short chase into the industrial site to the east until he was tazed, multiple times.
    
    The suspect was not compliant at all and required multiple tasers to become subdued and the assistance of another Officer to bring him under control. He was incredibly hostile throughout the entire interaction I had with him.
    
    The suspect, during the attempted arrest, also decided to kick myself directly in the groin.
    
    When returning to the vehicle with the suspect after he was finally detained, Detective Olsson had carried out some investigative work and identified him as an occupant of the vehicle, to which his statement will be able to provide the relevant details, I'm sure.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Matthew Burns, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Matthew Burns
    Police Officer III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 08/AUG/2025

  

• Exhibit #3: Bodycam footage - Police Officer Matthew Burns, 20/JUL/2025

  * In the bodycam footage you'd be watching from Officer Burns viewpoint as the passenger of 3-K-30 as it responds to the 911 call.
  * You'd see Officer Burns constantly keeping updated on the GPS Location and passing the relevant details to the driver, Detective Olsson
  * Upon nearing the scene of the stationary GPS, you'll see the Draugur crashed directly into a tree with an ATM attached to it by means of a rope.
  * You'll see 2 suspects fleeing from the vehicle itself, throughout the bodycam you would not see anyone approach the vehicle or anyone else be visible from any viewpoint either near the vehicle itself or from the hills surrounding it to the west.
  * Officer Burns would leave the cruiser and immediately take off after the masked defendant who would be running through the into the industrial area.
  * You'd watch a short foot pursuit, until Officer Burns is able to tase the suspect as he climbs over a chainlink fence.
  * After standing up from the tase, the suspect would then try to run away from Officer Burns again, causing him to be tased once more.
  * This would continue 3 more times until Officer Armani arrives on scene and is able to provide assistance.
  * With additional backup, Officer Burns moves to cuff the suspect whilst Officer Armani provides cover.
  * Whilst attempting to cuff the suspect, the suspect kicks out, striking Officer Burns, causing Officer Armani to tase him again.
  * Officer Burns is able to cuff the suspect before Mirdanerizing him and searching his person, removing his mask and identifying him via his licenses.
  * Officer Burns places the still aggressive suspect into Officer Armanis cruiser and you'd then watch them all drive back to the crashed draugur.
  * Officer Burns leaves the cruiser and has a discussion with Detective Olsson where he states he was able to pull fingerprints from the vehicle proving the defendant was inside as well as finding a Mini SMG Stashed inside the vehicle.
  A brief discussion regarding charges is had before Officer Burns adds the charges with his MDC and asks Officer Aramni to transport him to DOC whilst they secure the ATM and the vehicle.
  
  ((Proof of RP))

• Exhibit #4: Witness statement - Police Detective Alexander Olsson

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 20/JUL/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Alexander Olsson
    Date of Birth: 04/NOV/1998
    Phone Number: ###-####
    Occupation: Police Detective III, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • Late night on the 20th of July, 2025 myself and Police Officer III Matthew Burns responded to the tracker of an ATM that had sent an alarm due to loss of power with the GPS showing the unit as moving.
    
    The GPS tracker would lead us to El Rancho Boulevard where the GPS tracker would go off-road in an south-east bound direction, I drove down to try and intercept on Sustancia Road where myself and Officer Burns would find two individuals running away on foot from a Draugr which had crashed into a tree with the ATM closely attached behind, when we first saw them both individuals were roughly a few seconds away from the vehicle, running away from it across the road to El Buerro Heights.
    
    Officer Burns chased after the suspect that would later be identified as Nathan Whildo with Deputy Chief Elizabeth Sanchez following above in AIR-1 while I chased after the secondary suspect who would later be identified as Richard Forth with Police Detective II Edward Linton taking over the chase as I turned back to secure the Draugr.
    
    Both individuals would eventually be caught up to, detained and put under arrest while I secured and searched Draugr with the stolen ATM, while doing so two two Mini-SMG's would be located within the glove-box compartment of the vehicle, one with an extended magazine and one without any modifications.
    
    I conducted a fingerprint analysis on both firearms, finding fingerprints on the firearms lacking modifications matching that of Nathan Whildo's with the other firearm being put under the secondary suspect Richard Forth as the Registered Owner of the vehicle.
    
    Given that the suspect Nathan Whildo was seen fleeing the area only seconds after the Draugr with the ATM had struck into a tree alongside the secondary suspect Richard Forth, resisted arrest by continuing to flee Officer Burns on foot, even going as far as striking Officer Burns to elude arrest combined with Mr. Whildo's fingerprints being found on a firearm found inside the glovebox of the Draugr used in the crime we found it reasonable to suspect them as having taken part in the theft of the ATM.
    
    Additionally we concluded that even if Mr. Whildo somehow wasn't in the vehicle at the time of the theft taking place they directly assisted Mr. Forth in the crime by pulling away police resources by resisting arrest and battering pursuing officers giving Mr. Forth a chance to try and get away on foot and pulling officers away from the crashed Draugr with the stolen ATM.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Alexander Olsson, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Alexander Olsson
    Police Detective III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 06/AUG/2025

  

• Exhibit #5: Bodycam footage - Police Detective Alexander Olsson, 20/JUL/2025

  * Attached body camera footage would show events roughly occurring as described in Alexander Olsson's witness statements.
  
  Following the arrest of both suspects the body camera footage would show Detective Olsson securing the Black Draugr used to steal the ATM, locating two Mini-SMGs within the glove compartment of the vehicle. One would be equipped with an extended magazine and one without any modification.
  
  The footage would show the detective going through and conducting a thorough fingerprint analysis on both firearms. While no prints would be found on the modified Mini-SMG, there would be a clear print appearing within the powder on the other, which, upon being transferred to a lifting card and scanned into the MDC, would show as an exact match to Nathan Whildo's.
  ((Proof of RP))

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo
#25-BT-0109

A Motion for Summary Judgment was filed in the above case on the 18th of August, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Summary Judgment, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Explicit evidence
  • Detailed Explanation: In the discovery provided by the Prosecution, bodycam footage from Officer Matthew Burns shows the incident in its entirety. Responding to a 911 call, Officer Burns' unit arrives at the location of the tracker for the stolen ATM, discovering a crashed vehicle with two suspects fleeing on foot from it to evade law enforcement. The footage follows Officer Burns as they pursue and tase a masked suspect, who tries to run away again but is tased once more. The footage shows the suspect being arrested before kicking out at the arresting officers and hitting them, resulting in a third taser being deployed. The suspect is then processed on the scene and identified as the defendant, Nathan Whildo. A second recording from the bodycam footage of Detective Alexander Olsson shows the detective searching the suspect vehicle and uncovering two illegal firearms, performing a fingerprint analysis on both, resulting in a positive match for Nathan Whildo's prints in the MDC on one of the firearms, an unmodified Mini-SMG.
    
    The evidence provided by the Prosecution is unequivocal. The defendant is seen leaving the vehicle towing the stolen ATM, running from law enforcement before being tased, but continuing to resist as well as attacking them. The footage also shows the investigation regarding the firearms found in the suspect vehicle, with the defendant found to have been in control of one of the illegal firearms found inside.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court formally recognises the Motion for Discovery and Motion for Summary Judgement filed by the Prosecution on the 18th day of August, 2025.
  
  Defense, you will now have seven (7) days to file any objections to the Motion for Summary Judgement. If you require additional time, please file a Motion for Continuance with the provided reasoning.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Horton,
  
  The Public Defense Division appreciates the Court’s time and consideration. We are in the process of consulting with the Defendant to determine how they wish to proceed. As this consultation remains ongoing, the Defense respectfully requests a brief extension of the current timeline to ensure the Defendant’s position is fully and accurately represented.
  
  We are requesting an additional seven (7) days.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court will allow an additional seven (7) day extension to the previous order to ensure the Defendant has had the opportunity to discuss the matter with a Public Defense Attorney.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Your honor,
  
  After further review, the public defense division has been made aware that the defendant noted their wishes to self represent on the docket. That being said, we would like to kindly rescind our previous post. We thank the court for their time.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court recognises the latest notice from the Public Defense Division confirming that the Defendant wishes to self-represent based on their original filing. Given that the Motion for Summary Judgement was submitted by the Prosecution on the 19th of August and the Court has not heard any objections from the Defense, the Court will now be deliberating the Motion for Summary Judgement.
  
  The Court intends to have a decision submitted to the docket within the next three (3) days.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Nathan Whildo
#25-BT-0109

A decision was reached in the above case on the 1st day of September, 2025.

The Court has reviewed the Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by the Prosecution on the 19th of August, 2025. As the Defendant has opted for Self-Representation and has not submitted any objections to the Court during the lengthy period since this time, the Court will issue its verdict based on the undisputed facts of the case.

This is a case of an ATM being stolen on the 20th of July, 2025. The ATM was being towed behind a Draugur attached with a rope. Officers arrived on the scene of the Draugur, which was being tracked by live GPS updates, to find two individuals running on foot away from the Draugur. One of the individuals was identified later as the Defendant.

The Defendant has refuted the claim that they were involved in the ATM robbery, stating that they were "curious" as to the Draugur rolling down a hill.

The Court has reviewed the body-worn camera footage in Prosecution Exhibits #3 and #5 for the undisputed facts of the case.

Given the clear evidence captured by the body-worn cameras of the LSPD Officers involved in the scene, the clear resistance displayed by the Defendant, the physical attack on the arresting Officer, and the discovery of the illegal firearm that had the Defendant's prints in the vehicle that was used to facilitate the ATM robbery, the Court believes that the Prosecution has clearly demonstrated the Defendant's involvement in the alleged offenses.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee, I find the defendant, Nathan Whildo, guilty.
• On the count of GM04 - Resisting Arrest, I find the defendant, Nathan Whildo, guilty.
• On the count of GF10 - Grand Theft, I find the defendant, Nathan Whildo, guilty.
• On the count of WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm, I find the defendant, Nathan Whildo, guilty.

The Court will be assigning $10,000 in court fees to be paid by the Defendant.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]