#25-BT-0104, State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson

[Bobby Versace]

Defendant Name: Ottis Jackson
Defendant Phone: 498-6311
(( Defendant Discord: JigsawUK ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney

Charging Department: SD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 23/MAY/2025
Charge(s):

• Grand Theft Auto

Narrative:
My Client believes he was wrongfully charged

---

I, Bobby Versace, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 17th day of June, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 17th day of June, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Bobby Versace]

Bobby Versace
Private Defence Attorney
"Better Call Bobby"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 19th of June, 2025.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Witness Statement, Camila Navarro
  Witness Statement, Camila Navarro

  

  
  Bobby Versace
  Private Defence Attorney
  "Better Call Bobby"

  
  

  
  
  Case Information

  • Case Number: 25-BT-0104
    Incident Date: 23/MAY/2025

  
  Witness Information

  • Name: Camila Navarro
    Date of Birth: 09/DEC/1997
    Phone Number: 491-9522
    Occupation: N/A

  
  Witness Statement

  • I had given Ottis the keys to my car because I trust him as we are in a relationship and are now engaged. I knew my Ottis had my car and I consented to him taking it.

  
  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Camila Navarro, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    Camila Navarro
    Date: 26/05/2025
  
  
  
  
  Private Defence Attorney
  Better Call Bobby
  344-6745 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The court notes the exhibit #1 presented on the docket by the defense and accepts it to be heard at trial. As stated prior in other releases/documentation, objections to evidence will be handled at trial. Hold all back and forth until then. Prosecution, you now have the remainder of the time allotted to present discovery before the court will review the case or hand it over to the defendant for scheduling.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 16th of July, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Preparing evidence
  • Detailed Explanation: Clerical errors by previous prosecutors have resulted in evidence for the above case not having been gathered. The Prosecution recently discovered the slip-up and has already filed requests with the arresting department to correct the mistake, and is at work gathering the available evidence for this case. As such, the Prosecution is requesting an additional three (3) days to allow law enforcement to provide the correct material and for the Prosecution to provide the discovery on the docket, extending the deadline to Sunday, the 20th of July.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court formally recognises the motion for continuance filed by the Prosecution. Defense, do you have any objections to the above motion before the Court provides a decision? Given the Prosecution is only asking for a three (3) day extension, the Court will allow the defense to file any objections within twenty four (24) hours before providing a decision regardless.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Court Clerk
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]
  
  On behalf of
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Bobby Versace]

Bobby Versace
Private Defence Attorney
"Better Call Bobby"

---

To All Pertaining Parties,

The Defence would like to Object on the grounds that the Prosecution has already had 30 days to make sure that all relevant evidence had been gathered, which we feel is more than enough time to spot any "Clerical Errors" or "slip-up"s. This Continuation could be seen to be in violation of my clients 6th Amendment "Right to a speedy and public trial", as he has already waited 30 days and will have to wait even longer.

The Defence does not believe that the Defendant should have his Constitutional Rights Violated due to negligence of the Prosecution Division, and therefore would like to call for this motion to be denied.

Respectfully,


Private Defence Attorney
Better Call Bobby
344-6745 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

A decision was reached in the above case on the 16th day of July, 2025.

The Court formally recognises the objection from the defense. The Court also recognises the current personnel constraints that the Prosecution Division faces and the fact that the extension requested is relatively short.

As a result, the Court will be ruling in favor of the Prosecution. The Prosecution will now have an additional three (3) days to comply with the Order for Discovery.

So Ordered,


Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

On behalf of


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice was filed in the above case on the 20th of July, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Dropping charges
  • Detailed Explanation: Following an internal review, the Prosecution, through instruction from the Los Santos Sheriff's Department, is dropping all charges against the defendant as contested in this criminal case.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Ottis Jackson
#25-BT-0104

A decision was reached in the above case on the 20th day of July, 2025.

The prosecution's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal is hereby granted. The disputed charge of GF11 - Grand Theft Auto will be removed from the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.

The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $19,500 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Bobby Versace]

Bobby Versace
Private Defence Attorney
"Better Call Bobby"

---

All Pertaining Parties,

The Defence would like to thank Honourable Judge Kant, Attorney General Williams and Court Clerk Horton for their work on this case.
The Defence would like to express their gratitude to Attorney General Williams for dropping the contested charge and allowing true Justice to take place.

Respectfully,


Private Defence Attorney
Better Call Bobby
344-6745 — [email protected]