#25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Locked
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

#25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Salvador Rivera
Defendant Phone: 222-7338
(( Defendant Discord: stepslv ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT+2 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 29/DEC/2024 20:30
Charge(s):
  • GM19 - Face Concealment (b) (Misdemeanor $500)
  • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer (Misdemeanor $1000)
  • DM01 - Possession of a Schedule I Controlled Substance (Misdemeanor $2500)
  • DM02 - Possession of a Schedule II Controlled Substance (Misdemeanor $2000)
  • DM03 - Possession of a Schedule III Controlled Substance (Misdemeanor $1500)
  • DF04 - Trafficking a Controlled Substance (Felony $3000)
  • VF01 - Evading an Officer (Felony $3000)
  • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence (Felony $3000)
Narrative:
I believe my client was wrongfully charged


I, Piper Johnson, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 3rd day of January, 2025.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,
Image
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator

San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 7th day of February, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;


  • Requested Venue: Bench Trial
    • Detailed Explanation: The defendant invokes their Sixth Amendment right to a public and speedy trial. Therefore, the defendant requests that the court hear this case as a bench trial to expedite the process.




Image
Senior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

OBJECTION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

An Objection was filed in the above case on the 7th of February, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this objection to a recent motion filed by the Defense.


  • Motion being objected to: Defense's recent Motion for Change of Venue
    • Detailed Reasoning: The Prosecution objects to a change of venue for this case as it is not fit for a bench trial. The charges being contested by the defendant warrant an in-depth examination in court, and the amount of evidence against the defendant collected by the Prosecution is of a volume that cannot comprehensively be presented and examined in a bench trial. Due to these circumstances, the Prosecution requests that the case remains pending activation for a felony trial.




Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
[/quote]
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Prosecution and defense counsel,

    The court recognizes both the motion from the defense and the response from the prosecution. To move forward, we are requesting an inventory of the evidence of the prosecution. For example, how many exhibits will be provided to the court? This is not a request to present discovery to the courts, but simply explaining to the court what types of evidence and the amount of evidence to be provided to the court in order to evaluate the motion properly.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Superior Court Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Kant,

    The Prosecution will have at least seven (7) exhibits to be presented at trial.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Prosecution counsel,

    Please email the motion for discovery to myself for a private review to determine whether or not a bench trial would be a sufficient examination of evidence or if further examination is necessary by way of a general trial. Thank you to both parties for your patience in this matter. The court expects the execution of this order in 3 days time or we expect to see a motion for continuance from the prosecution.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3565
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
#25-BT-0063

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 28th day of April, 2025.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
#25-BT-0063

A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 27th of May, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;


  • Requested Venue: Formal trial
    • Detailed Explanation: The charges being contested by the defendant warrant an in-depth examination in court, and the amount of evidence against the defendant collected by the Prosecution is of a volume that cannot comprehensively be presented and examined in a bench trial. Due to these circumstances, the Prosecution requests that the case be returned to the original format for a formal trial.


Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Sayaka Yukimura and pertaining parties,

    The defense would like to review the evidence before agreeing to the prosecution's motion to change venue, especially since the 30-day deadline has passed as of today.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Lead Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Yukimura and pertaining parties,

    Allowing the Defense to review the evidence would defeat the purpose of changing the venue. As has been the procedure with other approved venue changes, the Order for Discovery has been rescinded in these circumstances, making counsel's point regarding the deadline for discovery having passed pointless. The Prosecution will inform Your Honor of the number of exhibits as well as their nature to allow for a more thorough decision on the motion. However, we will not provide any evidence publicly on the docket other than following a decision on the recent motion.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Prosecution and defense counsel,

    Thank you for your submission to the courts. Defense, your request has been noted. Prosecution, could you explain how this case would set precedence for the state? Please reach out via email if you feel this would disclose too much information publicly about the case at this stage.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Kant,

    The Prosecution has made no statement intending to set precedent with this case, nor do we believe there to be any potential for it.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,

    The Prosecution is formally withdrawing its Motion for Change of Venue. Discovery is ready to be provided as soon as the withdrawal of the motion is recognized.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
#25-BT-0063

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 5th of July, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Salvador Rivera, 29/DEC/2024
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"


    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Salvador Rivera
        Phone Number: 2227338
        Licenses Suspended: Yes
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Captain II Samuel Martin
        • Police Captain I Jason Steel
        • Police Sergeant I Jamie Lockwood
        • Police Sergeant II Charles Williams
        • Police Detective III George Hill
        • Police Officer III Mohamed Abdullah
        • Police Detective I Edward Linton
        Charges:
        • VF01 - Evading an Officer
        • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
        • DF04 - Trafficking a Controlled Substance
        • DM01 - Possession of a Schedule I Controlled Substance
        • DM02 - Possession of a Schedule II Controlled Substance
        • DM03 - Possession of a Schedule III Controlled Substance
        • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
        • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 29/DEC/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • 3-U-1 conducted a traffic stop on a Nero Custom that was clocked speeding on Route 68. Within seconds of the stop the Nero Custom started to evade. The airship (Edward Linton) was close by and managed to gain visual. During the pursuit the Nero Custom stopped and was seen getting out and dropping items onto the floor. The items were recovered by Lue and Jamie, all the drugs listed were the items that the suspect dropped.

          The pursuit came to an end when the suspect crashed and flipped his vehicle. The suspect was masked while evading. The suspect lied about dropping the items during the pursuit thus providing false information.
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: 33x LSD
          Exhibit B: 39x Crack
          Exhibit C: 150x Ecstasy
          Exhibit D: 10x Marijuana
          Exhibit E: 1x Mask


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Radio
          Exhibit B: Clothing
          Exhibit C: Car Speaker

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          ImageImage
    Image
  • Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Sergeant Jamie Lockwood
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 29/DEC/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Jamie Lockwood
      Date of Birth: 21/MAY/1998
      Phone Number: 400-1945
      Occupation: Sergeant I, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • Firstly, thank you for taking the time and effort to handle the matter!

      I will give a detailed recollection of the event that I recall clearly, the rest you will have to review my body cam.

      I was as far as I recall in an adam patrol with Officer Washington, I recall being in the back of the pursuit line, when AIR-1 called out that the vehicle stopped under a tree for a prolonged period of time and potentially dropped something, AIR-1 marked the location with a backup on the GPS and myself and Officer Washington broke away from the pursuit line to go ensure any evidence dropped was not stolen or tampered with, we look around the location of the backup and found the attached evidence, 150x Ecstasy, 39x Crack, 33x LSD and 10x Marijuana.

      We secured this evidence and as far as I recall, we did not participate in the remainder of the arrest, however for the sake of clarity, the evidence was found at the exact location the suspect vehicle stopped and the suspect dismounted, aswell as directly at the location of the backup.

      Thank you for your time!
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Jamie Lockwood, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,
      Image
      Sergeant I
      Jamie Lockwood
      Los Santos Police Department
      Date: 26/JAN/2025
    Image
  • Exhibit #3: Bodycam footage - Police Sergeant Jamie Lockwood, 29/DEC/2024
    * Video start as captain steel calls out a pursuit of a nero custom in TAC-1*

    The cruiser, driven by Officer Washington, follow the pursuit of a nero custom, informed to have evaded a traffic stop. VC of the vehicle is sporadically maintained.

    *about 3 minutes of pursuit entail with the cruiser following at highspeed CODE 3 to keep up with the vehicle*

    AIR-1 unit calls out over the TAC that the suspect vehicle has stopped on next backup and has exited the vehicle, shortly after The unit of Captain Martin and Captain Steels calls out that they have eyes on the suspect and that he is discarding evidence, immediately followed by a call that the suspect is getting back in his vehicle and taking off, the Cpatins unit pursuing, asking for a unit to remain with the evidence.

    I would open my GPS and note at what location the cruiser with ground eyes, as well as AIR-1 is located. placing an additional mark on the location. Sergeant Lockwood would then call out "Our unit will head the evidence drop and collect the evidence.

    Sergeant Lockwood and her partner head to the location, arriving roughly 30 seconds after Captain Steel's units left. Captain Martin calling out he also marked the location where he saw the suspect dropping evidence, sending the mark to Sergeant Lockwood and Officer Washington.

    I would start to look around the area of the mark sent by Captian Martin aswell as the backup dropped by AIR-1.

    Officer Washington would call out "Ive got it here"

    I Would run over to the location, careful to not move the evidence, taking out her GPS and comparing the location of the evidence with the AIR-1 Backup, the Mark by Captain Martin and the preliminary mark taken by Sergeant Lockwood.

    the Evidence would be within a very small area of the collective marks and backup.

    I begin to pack up the evidence wearing gloves, calling out the the evidence was seized and placed into the cruiser of 22-S-20.

    ((Proof of RP))
  • Exhibit #4: Witness statement - Police Detective Edward Linton
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 29/DEC/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Edward Linton
      Date of Birth: 02/SEP/1990
      Phone Number: 286-4405
      Occupation: Detective I, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I, while operating AIR-1, responded to a need for backup for a pursuit going west on Route 68. I gained visual of the vehicle and began giving callouts. After evading for a short while, the vehicle went off-road southbound, climbing a large hill before stopping under a tree. I dropped a GPS marker to mark the spot and saw him exit the vehicle. The suspect then got back in, evading again while myself in AIR-1, Captain Martin, and Steel continued chasing him. Another unit, who was not actively part of the pursuit, went and searched the area, finding a large amount of narcotics and calling this out over TAC. The pursuit then came to an end, and the suspect was apprehended.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Edward Linton, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,


      Edward Linton
      Detective I
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 30/JAN/2025
    Image
  • Exhibit #5: Witness statement - Police Captain Samuel Martin
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 29/DEC/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Samuel Martin
      Date of Birth: redacted
      Phone Number: redacted
      Occupation: Police Captain, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • Samuel Martin and Jason Steel clocked a Nero Custom driving over the speed limit on Route 68. A traffic stop was attempted by Samuel Martin and Jason Steel, to which the Nero evaded and a pursuit was called. Backup was called with an airship (Edward Linton) responding from closeby. Edward gained visual on the vehicle within a few seconds.

      Airship spotted the vehicle stopped next to a tree, as Samuel Martin approached he spotted the suspect dropping items onto the floor. The location was marked for another unit to collect the items. Police Sergeant Lockwood and Police Officer Washington went to the location and collected the evidence.

      The pursuit came to an end and the driver was identified as Salvador Rivera. Salvador claimed he has not dropped the items during the pursuit.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Samuel Martin, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,


      Samuel Martin
      Police Captain
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 29/JAN/2025
    Image
  • Exhibit #6: Witness statement - Police Captain Jason Steel
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 29/DEC/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Jason Steel
      Date of Birth: 20/JUN/1991
      Phone Number: 288 68 44
      Occupation: Police Captain, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • To the best of my recollection, I, Captain Jason Steel while on-duty as a police officer and operating a police vehicle clocked a Nero Custom driving past the speed limit on Route 68 (at this later date, I do not recall the exact speed). I turned on the lights and sirens on my vehicle and the Nero pulled over for a regular traffic stop. I called for backup and the Nero drove away from the traffic stop before being released from detainment, attempting to elude us at high speeds. LSPD Airship arrived overhead relatively quickly, being flown by Police Detective Edward Linton. The driver of the Nero took the super car off road and through mountains, so that my police vehicle had trouble keeping up, but the Airship was able to maintain strong visual. The airship communicated to me the Nero's position, and stated that it stopped near the root of a tree; we approached quickly and saw a man dropping items on the ground, then re-enter the Nero and drive away. The LSPD's GPS system to mark the location of the dropped items for Police Sergeant Lockwood and her partner, whom were able to arrive at the location marked by us, and found narcotics on the ground. The Nero continued evading until his vehicle was flipped during the pursuit, at that point being placed in cuffs and identified as Salvadore Rivera. The suspect stated either that he did not drop anything, or that he doesn't know anything about narcotics, or both.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Jason Steel, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      JASON STEEL
      Police Captain
      Los Santos Police Department
      Date: 24/JAN/2024
    Image

Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is to serve as a THIRD AND FINAL notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

    Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    Branch Administrator

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Hope Kant
Judicial Branch
Posts: 6454
Joined: 30 Jan 2021, 19:56
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0063 State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera

Post by Hope Kant »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
#25-BT-0063

A decision was reached in the above case on the 3rd day of August, 2025.


Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be accepting the plea of guilty from the defendant. The defendant was given ample time to interact with the courts and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As little to no contact has been made with the courts in the past 3-4 weeks, this case will now be archived and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.

Respectfully,

Image
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Bench Trials”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Meta [Bot] and 1 guest