Plaintiff Names: Lola Devalera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay
Defendant Phone: 4312029
(( Defendant Discord: skeletee))
(( Defendant Discord: kimmsterr_))
(( Defendant Discord: opheliakay))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Attorney, Darby Adler - Licensed Attorney
Defendant Phone: 4312029
(( Defendant Discord: skeletee))
(( Defendant Discord: kimmsterr_))
(( Defendant Discord: opheliakay))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Attorney, Darby Adler - Licensed Attorney
Date & Time of Incident(s): 13/May/2025 21:20
Charge(s):
City of Los Santos
4312029
Attorney for Plaintiff
________________________________________
Plaintiffs Lola Devalera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully alleges as follows:
The Defendant Marco Davis, through a course of conduct which can be established since the inception of Mr. Davis taking the position of CEO of Weazel Entertainment News Group(‘Weazel News’), has unlawfully harassed the Plaintiffs.
The Defendant, Marco Davis (‘Mr. Davis’) and other employees of Weazel News as identified through disclosure, unlawfully imprisoned the Plaintiffs in the Weazel News Building, Los Santos.
The Defendant, Officer Wegman, without lawful excuse used a taser against Miss. Devalera and Miss. Kay, which has resulted in both physical and emotional injury.
________________________________________
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Article III, section 3 Constitution of San Andreas, which holds, “The jurisdiction of the judicial power shall extend to all cases in which citizens of San Andreas are party to”, and by virtue of the 6th Amendment, Constitution of San Andreas, “In all criminal trials brought forth by or too the San Andreas Judicial Branch, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial Judge of the State wherein the crime shall have been committed, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against them; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in their favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense.”
2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Article III, section 4.1 Constitution of San Andreas, as it is trite in law this is the lowest Criminal Court of which the Plaintiffs can present their case. All the alleged crimes occurred within the City of Los Santos.
________________________________________
PARTIES
3. Plaintiffs, Lola Delavera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay are residents of the City of Los Santos and are individuals under the laws of the City of Los Santos.
4. Defendant, Marco Davis, is a resident of the City of Los Santos and is an individual duly organized under the laws of the City of Los Santos.
________________________________________
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
5. On or around the 5th November 2024, within the City of Los Santos, The Defendant entered into Weazel Entertainment News Network as it’s CEO. The Defendant knows of the Plaintiffs, through their work as a highly successful and widely known celebrity group “The Girlies”. The Girlies, through their work as businesswomen, entrepreneurs, public figures and philanthropists are widely known throughout San Andreas; if not arguably the world. The Defendant, resultantly, regularly since the aforementioned date often used The Girlies, in order to promote or use within publications issued by Weasel News. Such publications were mutually beneficial.
6. The relationship began peacefully. However, in the last two months, the Defendant has taken poorly to the continued success of the Girlies. The Defendant, or employees of Weazel News, for which he is vicariously liable, has on numerous occasions posted posters of Plaintiff Hayden Onizuka, which are of a degrading and distressing manner — namely, depicting Miss. Onizuka lying prone on the floor appearing deceased. The posters were placed outside The Girlies place of work and were publicly visible. This has occurred on more than one occasion which can be evidenced through witness testimony and photographic evidence taken. This image has resultantly been effectively ‘published’ with the clear intention of causing humiliation, alarm, and emotional distress to Miss. Onizuka.
7. Furthermore, two of The Plaintiffs, Miss Devalera and Miss. Kay, on the 13th May 2025, at around 21:20 hours attended Weazel News in order to try to reach an agreement with The Defendant to bring an end to this course of conduct. Understandably, The Plaintiffs were very emotionally distressed by this and admit to spray painting inside the Weazel News building.
8. After this occurred, The Defendant entered into the building. He then took it upon himself to lock the doors to the building, making it so The Plaintiffs could not leave. This was despite The Plaintiffs agreement that they would remove the graffiti themselves. The Plaintiffs were then kept within the confines of the building against their will; despite their pleas to leave. The Los Santos Police Department were called by the Girlies and a police officer, Officer Wegman, attended. Upon his attendance, The Plaintiffs due to the mess created by removing the graffiti, were barely clothed. Despite this, Officer Wegman, unlawfully and without reason, tasered The Plaintiffs. This has caused them injuries both physical and mental.
9. It is respectfully submitted that The Defendant was not acting in relation to a legal detainment, by virtue of the Plaintiff’s agreement to carry out the remedial work agreed as described in paragraph 7. Any such force or actions used by The Defendant, including locking the doors, are unreasonable and unlawful. The Defendant is not a police officer or certified medical personnel.
________________________________________
CAUSES OF ACTION
First Cause of Action: Harrassment
10. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 8 as if fully set forth herein.
11. Harrassment, contrary to NM09, State of San Andreas Penal Code, which prescribes: -
“Section A:Willfully and knowingly performing repeat unwelcome actions against a single individual or group that are intended or designed to scare, annoy, seriously alarm, cause substantial emotional distress to, or create a generally unpleasant situation, without any legitimate or lawful purpose. Section A, Subsection 1:For the purposes of Section A, “emotional distress” shall be defined as to cause Anxiety, Sorrow, or Emotional Pain Section B: Harassment, as defined in section A of this charge, shall also be unlawful when done through the use of SMS messaging or social media, such as LifeInvader.”
Second Cause of Action: False Imprisonment
12. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 7 through 8 as if fully set forth herein.
13. False Imprisonment, contrary to GM21 State of San Andreas Penal Code, which prescribes: -
“The unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another. No person may restrain, detain, or confined another person without his/her consent unless such action is in relation to legal detainment done by a civilian (citizen's arrest), police, or certified medical personnel. The crime can be committed with or without force or violence. If a person is restrained, detained, or confined with or without force to avoid an impending arrest, this will be upgraded to SF-09.
Third Cause of Action: False Imprisonment
14. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 7 through 8 as if fully set forth herein.
15. Battery, contrary to GM02 State of San Andreas Penal Code, which prescribes: -
"Willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another."
________________________________________
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Award a custodial prison sentence against Marco Davis and any employees under his control and damages in the amount of $3,000,000,00, plus interest to The Plaintiff on account of harassment by Mr. Davis and employees under his control;
B. Award a custodial prison sentence against Marco Davis and any employees under his control and damages in the amount of $2,000,000,00, plus interest to The Plaintiffs. Miss. Devalera and Miss. Kay on account of unlawful imprisonment by Mr Davis and employees under his control;
C. Award a custodial prison sentence againt Officer Webman and damages in the amount of $5,000,000,00, plus interest to The Plaintiffs. Miss. Devalera and Miss. Kay on account of battery against them by Officer Webman.
D. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
________________________________________
D.Adler
Dated: 14th May 2025
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
Darby Adler
Attorney for Plaintiff
I, Darby Adler, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Charge(s):
- Harrassment
- False Imprisonment
- Battery
City of Los Santos
4312029
Attorney for Plaintiff
________________________________________
San Andreas Judicial Branch
CITY OF LOS SANTOS
________________________________________
Lola Devalera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay
Plaintiff
-against-
Marco Davis and other involved employees of Weazel Entertainment News Network
Defendant 1
-and-
Officer Wegman
Defendant 2
________________________________________
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR HARRASSMENT, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND BATTERY
________________________________________
INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPHCITY OF LOS SANTOS
________________________________________
Lola Devalera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay
Plaintiff
-against-
Marco Davis and other involved employees of Weazel Entertainment News Network
Defendant 1
-and-
Officer Wegman
Defendant 2
________________________________________
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR HARRASSMENT, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND BATTERY
________________________________________
Plaintiffs Lola Devalera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully alleges as follows:
The Defendant Marco Davis, through a course of conduct which can be established since the inception of Mr. Davis taking the position of CEO of Weazel Entertainment News Group(‘Weazel News’), has unlawfully harassed the Plaintiffs.
The Defendant, Marco Davis (‘Mr. Davis’) and other employees of Weazel News as identified through disclosure, unlawfully imprisoned the Plaintiffs in the Weazel News Building, Los Santos.
The Defendant, Officer Wegman, without lawful excuse used a taser against Miss. Devalera and Miss. Kay, which has resulted in both physical and emotional injury.
________________________________________
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Article III, section 3 Constitution of San Andreas, which holds, “The jurisdiction of the judicial power shall extend to all cases in which citizens of San Andreas are party to”, and by virtue of the 6th Amendment, Constitution of San Andreas, “In all criminal trials brought forth by or too the San Andreas Judicial Branch, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial Judge of the State wherein the crime shall have been committed, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against them; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in their favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense.”
2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Article III, section 4.1 Constitution of San Andreas, as it is trite in law this is the lowest Criminal Court of which the Plaintiffs can present their case. All the alleged crimes occurred within the City of Los Santos.
________________________________________
PARTIES
3. Plaintiffs, Lola Delavera, Hayden Onizuka, Ophelia Kay are residents of the City of Los Santos and are individuals under the laws of the City of Los Santos.
4. Defendant, Marco Davis, is a resident of the City of Los Santos and is an individual duly organized under the laws of the City of Los Santos.
________________________________________
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
5. On or around the 5th November 2024, within the City of Los Santos, The Defendant entered into Weazel Entertainment News Network as it’s CEO. The Defendant knows of the Plaintiffs, through their work as a highly successful and widely known celebrity group “The Girlies”. The Girlies, through their work as businesswomen, entrepreneurs, public figures and philanthropists are widely known throughout San Andreas; if not arguably the world. The Defendant, resultantly, regularly since the aforementioned date often used The Girlies, in order to promote or use within publications issued by Weasel News. Such publications were mutually beneficial.
6. The relationship began peacefully. However, in the last two months, the Defendant has taken poorly to the continued success of the Girlies. The Defendant, or employees of Weazel News, for which he is vicariously liable, has on numerous occasions posted posters of Plaintiff Hayden Onizuka, which are of a degrading and distressing manner — namely, depicting Miss. Onizuka lying prone on the floor appearing deceased. The posters were placed outside The Girlies place of work and were publicly visible. This has occurred on more than one occasion which can be evidenced through witness testimony and photographic evidence taken. This image has resultantly been effectively ‘published’ with the clear intention of causing humiliation, alarm, and emotional distress to Miss. Onizuka.
7. Furthermore, two of The Plaintiffs, Miss Devalera and Miss. Kay, on the 13th May 2025, at around 21:20 hours attended Weazel News in order to try to reach an agreement with The Defendant to bring an end to this course of conduct. Understandably, The Plaintiffs were very emotionally distressed by this and admit to spray painting inside the Weazel News building.
8. After this occurred, The Defendant entered into the building. He then took it upon himself to lock the doors to the building, making it so The Plaintiffs could not leave. This was despite The Plaintiffs agreement that they would remove the graffiti themselves. The Plaintiffs were then kept within the confines of the building against their will; despite their pleas to leave. The Los Santos Police Department were called by the Girlies and a police officer, Officer Wegman, attended. Upon his attendance, The Plaintiffs due to the mess created by removing the graffiti, were barely clothed. Despite this, Officer Wegman, unlawfully and without reason, tasered The Plaintiffs. This has caused them injuries both physical and mental.
9. It is respectfully submitted that The Defendant was not acting in relation to a legal detainment, by virtue of the Plaintiff’s agreement to carry out the remedial work agreed as described in paragraph 7. Any such force or actions used by The Defendant, including locking the doors, are unreasonable and unlawful. The Defendant is not a police officer or certified medical personnel.
________________________________________
CAUSES OF ACTION
First Cause of Action: Harrassment
10. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 8 as if fully set forth herein.
11. Harrassment, contrary to NM09, State of San Andreas Penal Code, which prescribes: -
“Section A:Willfully and knowingly performing repeat unwelcome actions against a single individual or group that are intended or designed to scare, annoy, seriously alarm, cause substantial emotional distress to, or create a generally unpleasant situation, without any legitimate or lawful purpose. Section A, Subsection 1:For the purposes of Section A, “emotional distress” shall be defined as to cause Anxiety, Sorrow, or Emotional Pain Section B: Harassment, as defined in section A of this charge, shall also be unlawful when done through the use of SMS messaging or social media, such as LifeInvader.”
Second Cause of Action: False Imprisonment
12. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 7 through 8 as if fully set forth herein.
13. False Imprisonment, contrary to GM21 State of San Andreas Penal Code, which prescribes: -
“The unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another. No person may restrain, detain, or confined another person without his/her consent unless such action is in relation to legal detainment done by a civilian (citizen's arrest), police, or certified medical personnel. The crime can be committed with or without force or violence. If a person is restrained, detained, or confined with or without force to avoid an impending arrest, this will be upgraded to SF-09.
Third Cause of Action: False Imprisonment
14. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 7 through 8 as if fully set forth herein.
15. Battery, contrary to GM02 State of San Andreas Penal Code, which prescribes: -
"Willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another."
________________________________________
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Award a custodial prison sentence against Marco Davis and any employees under his control and damages in the amount of $3,000,000,00, plus interest to The Plaintiff on account of harassment by Mr. Davis and employees under his control;
B. Award a custodial prison sentence against Marco Davis and any employees under his control and damages in the amount of $2,000,000,00, plus interest to The Plaintiffs. Miss. Devalera and Miss. Kay on account of unlawful imprisonment by Mr Davis and employees under his control;
C. Award a custodial prison sentence againt Officer Webman and damages in the amount of $5,000,000,00, plus interest to The Plaintiffs. Miss. Devalera and Miss. Kay on account of battery against them by Officer Webman.
D. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
________________________________________
D.Adler
Dated: 14th May 2025
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
Darby Adler
Attorney for Plaintiff
I, Darby Adler, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
