#26-BT-0057, State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci

Post Reply
Joshua Frost
Posts: 18
Joined: 06 Oct 2024, 02:18
ECRP Forum Name: Coolxghf
Discord: Coolxghf

#26-BT-0057, State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci

Post by Joshua Frost »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Lucien Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 206-4665
(( Defendant Discord: Nexus111 ))
(( Defendant Timezone: EU ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney - Rockford Law
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 07/June/2026 17:44
Charge(s):
  • GC03 - Disorderly Conduct
    GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
Narrative:
My Client believes they have been Wrongfully Charged.



I, Joshua Frost, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Image
User avatar
Audrey Hartwell
Posts: 92
Joined: 02 Oct 2024, 16:19
ECRP Forum Name: Harley
Discord:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci

Post by Audrey Hartwell »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 8th of June, 2026.


I, Audrey Hartwell, a Private Defense Attorney with Rockford Law, will be representing the Defendant(s), Name in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Image
Managing Partner
Rockford Law
#377-1669 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 374
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0057, State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci
#26-BT-0057

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 9th day of June, 2026.


The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 374
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0057, State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci
#26-BT-0057

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 9th day of June, 2026.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Lucien Vespucci is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
Post Reply

Return to “SAJB - Criminal Court”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests