Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Ghost Nixon
Defendant Phone: 4433939
(( Defendant Discord: ghost_mane01 ))
(( Defendant Timezone: EST ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 17/APR/2026 02:25 AM
Charge(s):

• GM19 - Face Concealment (b) Misdemeanor
  GF03 - Armed Robbery
  Accessory to VF01 - Evading an Officer

Narrative:
While running around at Legion, I see a pursuit going on. I was talking with a friend. I then turned the corner on foot, almost getting hit by a bus with 10-plus people in it. They then followed me, telling me to get in. I said no. Ran up into a parking garage. Then I hear sirens behind me in a second. Later I'm getting shot in the back. No demands to stop running or this is the police just shot in the back... the cop runs up reading me my rights and cuffing me, and I'm asking what happened because He just shot me in the back. He puts me in the cruiser. And takes me down to a scene and tells me I'm getting charged with armed robbery and accessory to evading. At the time of my arrest, I was wearing purple pants. No shirt (because it was hot outside) and my helmet that helps with my anxiety. They rip my helmet off. Find nothing on me. Suspends my license for running on foot... no car... they all 3 said their badge numbers, but sadly I only Remembered the name David Loan. I informed the cops I had no part in what happened, as I was just with the bus of people that almost hit me. and that I was also in a gang HQ... when they drove up and shot me in the back. They didn't seem to care? As one of the officers states, "See you next year in court." Which is highly disrespectful after sending me through emotional distress. Upon Leaving DOC I found out my helmet,Mask,Radio was missing from the evidence locker within the DOC Grounds... I have had that helmet on for Majority of my life ((3 years IRL Time Since I joined the server)) an have gone though so much with it. and Now I don't even know if I'm ever gonna see it again.

---

I, Ghost Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Ghost Kamado is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

• Mr. Nixon and defense counsel,
  
  This would require a formal motion and, therefore, is best discussed and deferred to the Public Defender representing you. It is advised that you reach out to Chief Public Defender Hugh Allgood regarding said evidence.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest report

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Samuel Martin
      Callsign: WILLIAM-20
      
      Date of Arrest: 17/APR/2026
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Captain Cyrus Carver
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      LSPD were in pursuit of a Niobe from a store robbery. During the pursuit a monstrociti was spotted following. Later in the pursuit the suspect in the Niobe smashed into a wall and ran towards the same monstrociti that was now empty.
      
      Ghost Nixon was seen fleeing the area of the monstrociti and ran onto the roof of the gun store next to PDM. Ghost was stopped and detained. The monstrociti was registered to Ghost and inside the glovebox were his pants used during the store robbery. Ghost matched the bolo. Ghost and Javier Cruz (the Niobe driver) was on the same freq 1245.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Ghost Nixon
      Phone Number: 4433939
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      • VF01 - Accessory to Evading an Officer
      • GF03 - Armed Robbery
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      Exhibit B:
      Exhibit C:
      Exhibit D:
      Exhibit E:
      Exhibit F:
      Exhibit G:
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 19:00 on 31st day of May, 2026 (following #26-BT-0030) at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Due to a clerical error, the prior trial date of the 31st is no longer valid. A scheduling notice will be sent out shortly.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Patrone and pertaining parties,
  
  Defense has filed availability.
  
  
  Chief Public Defender
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  235-6076 - [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 19:00 on 7th day of June, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;

• Requested Discovery: CCTV: Legion Bank
  • Detailed Reasoning: As noted in the Defendant's April 19th request, the Defense is requesting the State to provide CCTV from outside the bank, as the Defense believes the Defendant's actions to be pertinent to this matter, considering the State has charged the Defendant with GF03 - Armed Robbery.
    
    ((This will have to be RPed out via text with the Defendant and any other players deemed necessary.))

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest Report

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Samuel Martin
      Callsign: WILLIAM-20
      
      Date of Arrest: 17/APR/2026
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Captain Cyrus Carver
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      LSPD were in pursuit of a Niobe from a store robbery. During the pursuit a monstrociti was spotted following. Later in the pursuit the suspect in the Niobe smashed into a wall and ran towards the same monstrociti that was now empty.
      
      Ghost Nixon was seen fleeing the area of the monstrociti and ran onto the roof of the gun store next to PDM. Ghost was stopped and detained. The monstrociti was registered to Ghost and inside the glovebox were his pants used during the store robbery. Ghost matched the bolo. Ghost and Javier Cruz (the Niobe driver) was on the same freq 1245.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Ghost Nixon
      Phone Number: 4433939
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      • VF01 - Accessory to Evading an Officer
      • GF03 - Armed Robbery
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      Exhibit B:
      Exhibit C:
      Exhibit D:
      Exhibit E:
      Exhibit F:
      Exhibit G:
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

• Defense counsel,
  
  Does the CCTV provided in the prosecution's first exhibit cover the request made by the Motion to Compel Discovery?
  
  If not, can the defense clarify the exact camera, timeframe, and owner from whom they are seeking footage?
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Patrone and pertaining parties,
  
  I do not believe so.
  
  The State is alleging that Mr. Nixon was part of this pursuit, whereas Mr. Nixon is stating they were merely in the wrong area of the pursuit, when they were shot in the back by police and arrested. There is nothing in the State's exhibit about this bus, or Mr. Nixon speaking with the occupants of the bus prior to his arrest.
  
  To answer the questions;
  
  Exact camera: CCTV camera from inside of Legion Bank and the two ATMs outside
  Timeframe: During the timeframe of the pursuit alleged by the State
  Owner: Fleeca Bank
  
  Edit: here's an image of the camera locations at the Fleeca bank, and a map showing the location of the Fleeca Bank (where the purple JB car is parked) compared to the area where the State shows in their exhibits. As noted, the camera location at the Fleeca Bank is not covered anywhere in the State's exhibit (it's on the other side of the block)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Chief Public Defender
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  235-6076 - [email protected]

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Does Prosecution have any objections to this motion?
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the new availability reported by parties, this trial shall take place at 19:00 on the 14th day of June, 2026, at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

The Court has reviewed the defense's Motion to Compel Discovery. As there has been no rebuttal from the prosecution, they shall consider this an official order to retrieve the CCTV from the Fleeca Bank's Legion Square Branch. This order includes CCTV footage from inside the Fleeca Bank interior camera and from the two ATMs outside. The footage to be obtained shall cover the timeframe of the pursuit alleged by the State.

The prosecution has three (3) days to retrieve this footage, as the case is set to go to trial on Sunday.

(( Please let us know when it is retrieved ICly and placed as another Exhibit, then I can have Ghost conduct the RP via /do. ))


So Ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an additional two days to collect the requested evidence.

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

The Court has reviewed the prosecution's Motion for Continuance. As there has been no rebuttal from the defense, the prosecution shall be granted the requested two (2) day continuance, beginning from the time their Motion was filed.


So Ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Today's trial had to be canceled due to unforeseen circumstances. I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and thank you in advance for your understanding.
  
  New dates should go out shortly.
  
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

• Prosecution,
  
  Have you retrieved the footage from the Fleeca bank?
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 19:00 on 21st day of June, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

---

---

The facts of the case are as follows:

• A store robbery occurred, resulting in the officers pursuing a Niobe.
• A Monstrociti was spotted at one time following the pursuit.
• The driver of the Niobe hit a wall in proximity to a Monstrociti owned by the defendant.
• The defendant was seen about a block away and detained. He was on the same radio frequency as the Niobe driver.
• CCTV shows the same tattoos as the defendant during an unknown store robbery.

---

---

The prosecution argues that it presents a straightforward narrative supported by evidence that confirms the robbery scene through matching tattoos, a helmet, and the defendant's build, thereby establishing the defendant's involvement. They believe the defendant followed a pursuit after the robbery, was observed following the pursuit, and then abandoned his vehicle near an active crime with the intent to help the suspect being pursued. They point out that the defendant was on the same frequency as the suspect during the pursuit. They argue that, combined with further items found on his person and the location of his vehicle nearby, sufficient evidence exists to implicate his involvement in the charges.


The defense claims that the case ultimately hinges on factual questions. They assert that the defendant cannot be linked to the pursuit by mere happenstance, such as the mere spotting of a vehicle matching the defendant's. They argue that the charge of store robbery, based solely on information not presented in evidence, is invalid and unjust, and further note that no weapon or proceeds were found. They contend the vehicle used was not proven to be in the owner's possession during the robbery or pursuit, nor does its location afterward suggest any criminal intent on his part. They argue that the defendant was shot in the back and subsequently charged with all three crimes without any prior notice, contending the Court should view this during deliberation as an unlawful search, seizure, and use of force.

---

---

It is noted for the record that Ghost Kamado has changed his name to Ghost Nixon.

Exhibit A of the arrest report and narrative statement of "inside the glovebox were his pants" is hereby suppressed as it is ruled there is no probable cause pursuant to the search of the vehicle.

The defense admits the defendant's narrative in the original submission as Exhibit B.

Finally, the Court recognizes that the prosecution failed to comply with the court order to obtain CCTV camera evidence from the bank.

The prosecution contends that the defendant was an accessory to the evading offense committed by Javier Cruz, the driver of a fleeing Niobe. To support this, the prosecution relies on three key pieces of evidence to establish the defendant's guilt: that a Monstrociti matching the description of the defendant’s vehicle was seen following the active pursuit; that after a subsequent crash of the Niobe, the driver fled in the direction of the defendant’s nearby parked vehicle; and a radio frequency match between the two individuals.

While the prosecution attempts to establish the defendant's assistance in the main suspect's evasion, the Court finds that the evidence does not establish that the defendant intentionally interfered or acted to interfere with the active pursuit. Furthermore, being on the same public frequency may amount to reasonable suspicion, but without more substantiation, it does not amount to proof of criminal collusion. Criminal intent also cannot be inferred solely from the proximity of an individual or their property to a rapidly changing and evolving crime scene. Without further evidence, mere proximity is insufficient to prove intent to criminally aid or abet.

The Court turns its attention to the charge of GF03 Armed Robbery. The prosecution introduces CCTV footage showing an individual with body art matching the defendant's distinct tattoos, and the defendant wearing the same helmet as found on his person.

While the matching physical markings strongly suggest identity, the record lacks a contextual narrative, location, or timeframe linking the incident shown in the CCTV footage to the robbery for which the defendant faces charges in this case. The Court cannot fill evidentiary gaps when presented with a lack of temporal or spatial context pertaining to the actual event. Because of this absence of context, the Court cannot connect inference to proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of GF03 - Armed Robbery, I find the defendant, Ghost Nixon, not guilty.
• On the count of Accessory to VF01 - Evading an Officer, I find the defendant, Ghost Nixon, not guilty.
• On the count of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), I find the defendant, Ghost Nixon, not guilty.

The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $87,000 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.



So Ordered,

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]