Eclipse Government

Exhibit #1 Arrest report

Los Santos Police Department WARRANT REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

---

• SUSPECT DETAILS
  • Full Name: Becks Hirano
    Phone Number: 4022305
    Officers Involved:
    • Police Detective II Mick Wegman
    • Police Detective III Jordan Blix
    • Police Captain III George Hill
    • Police Officer III Adrianna Hill
    Charges:
    • SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
    • VF01 - Evading an Officer
    • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
    • WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
    • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
  INCIDENT NARRATIVE
  • Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to validate the justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
    • Adriana Hill was being pursued by a Blue LC which she requested backup to have it pulled over, I responded after he pulled over the then got out and pointed a gun at myself which she demanded me to call for SD informing it was a Code 1.
      
      She then demanded that she was to find out who took her belongings, which SD arrived and took over negotiations. Frank Peters stated "Becks Hirano" where she confirmed even stating that he said her full name. She continued to keep me hostage later until SD arrived with the headphones from DOC then took Frank Peters hostage until he put her headphones on herself, she then got in her vehicle taking off.
    Method of Identification
    • VISUAL IDENTIFICATIOn
  EVIDENCE DETAILS
  • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
    Illegal evidence must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal evidence are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
    
    Where possible the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
    • Illegal Evidence:
      
      
      Photograph of possessions in evidence locker (if applicable)

• Detailed Reasoning: I request that all information highlighted in yellow be suppressed. There are multiple inconsistencies throughout the arrest report that contradict themselves.
  
  The arrest report contains a material inconsistency that undermines its reliability and credibility. In the statement, the reporting officer writes: “he pulled over then got out and pointed a gun at myself which she demanded me to call for SD informing it was a Code 1.” The report first identifies the alleged actor as “he,” then later refers to the same individual as “she” without clarification. Because the statement fails to consistently identify the individual allegedly involved in the conduct at issue, it is ambiguous on its face and creates uncertainty as to who actually performed the alleged acts. This inconsistency calls into question the accuracy of the officer’s observations, recollection, and documentation.
  
  The report contains an additional inconsistency regarding the identification of the alleged suspect. The report states: “Frank Peters stated ‘Becks Hirano’ where she confirmed even stating that he said her full name.” However, the accompanying notation lists the “Method of Identification” as “VISUAL IDENTIFICATION.”
  
  These statements are directly contradictory, Law enforcement cannot simultaneously claim the identification was made by hearing a person state a name while officially documenting the method as purely “visual identification” without explaining the discrepancy within the report itself.