Page 1 of 1
#25-BT-0034 State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 05 Nov 2024, 20:34
by Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Defendant Name: Doris Ramsterpegthorp and Jack Ramsterpegthorp
Defendant Phone: 3062204
(( Defendant Discord: Teenyinnit ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Charging Department: PD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 05/11/2024 19:00?
Charge(s):
Narrative:
Me and Jack did not commit this crime.
We were married 3 days ago and a bunch of people showed up to our wedding dressed as us, some very convincingly so.
These people are committing obvious crimes in our name and getting us arrested.
At the time of the store robbery, myself and Jack were collecting our various vehicles from around the city and returning them to parking, we didn't rob the store.
Please note in the footage how the "Doris" walks differently to me, doesn't wear a mask, and was holding a gun.
I was found with no gun, a Mask in my Issi Classic, and no evidence of any crime whilst actively trying to get a mechanic to fix my vehicle as i had been doing.
If i were to do a crime, I wouldn't do it in an Issi classic as it's top speed is about 135mph and it's extremely unreliable on the road.
These copycats are extremely good but they are not us and this is the second or third time we've both been arrested for the crimes of these lunatics!
I,
Doris Ramsterpegthorp, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))

Re: Appeal - Doris and Jack Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 12 Nov 2024, 22:43
by Maximilian Fitzgerald

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
- To whom it may concern,
Your submission to the Superior Court of San Andreas has been received. It is currently unclear whether only the petitioner (Doris Ramsterpegthorp) would like to dispute the charges or if all those named within the submission document (Jack Ramsterpegthorp) wish to dispute the charges as outlined in this initial posting.
All those disputing charges will be required to reply to this message with a government website account of their own by filling out the following form provided below. The form will offer another opportunity to provide a narrative if needed and contains the required affirmation that the specified individual wishes to be a co-defendant of the case. The courts require that co-defendants file the form within 7 days time or we will consider their charges no longer in contest.
Defendant Name: Firstname Lastname
Defendant Phone: ###-####
Defendant Address: HERE
(( Defendant Discord: HERE ))
Supplementary Narrative:
HERE
I, Firstname Lastname, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Code: Select all
[img]https://i.imgur.com/hq6d7UW.png[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/6h9z9Jh.png[/img]
[divbox=antiquewhite]
[b]Defendant Name:[/b] Firstname Lastname
[b]Defendant Phone:[/b] ###-####
[b]Defendant Address:[/b] HERE
[b][color=#0040FF](([/color] Defendant Discord:[/b] HERE [color=#0040FF][b]))[/b][/color]
[/divbox]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/wjDADzN.png[/img]
[divbox=antiquewhite]
[b]Supplementary Narrative:[/b]
HERE
[hr][/hr]
I, [b]Firstname Lastname[/b], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. [b][color=#0000FF](([/color][/b] I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. [b][color=#0000FF]))[/color][/b]
[/divbox]
As will be indicated in the future Notice of Receipt: the defendants are further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Respectfully,

Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]

Re: State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 03 Dec 2024, 19:57
by Maximilian Fitzgerald
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 3rd day of December, 2024.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.
The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]

Re: #25-BT-0034 State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 26 Apr 2025, 23:18
by Sayaka Yukimura
Re: #25-BT-0034 State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 07 May 2025, 20:32
by Adithya Ramesh

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
#25-BT-0034
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 05 DEC, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE" |
MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
-
Full Name: Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Phone Number: 3602204
Licenses Suspended: No
Officers Involved:
- Police Officer III Stan Foxx
Charges:
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
- Incident Date: 05/NOV/2024
Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
- Detective Fox placed a BOLO from a store robbery. The CCTV clear as day, catches Jack and Doris Ramsterpegthorp robbing a store without masks. As I began patrol and started to search for the two. LSC was one of the place's I visited. A friend of mine was working and I asked him to give me a call if he spotted the two. He then informs me that they actually just placed a Mechanic Request, just above the toll booth off of GOH. I arrived on scene and placed both of them in custody. They both strongly claimed they were being impersonated but the evidence was to present to overturn. They were processed successfully without further incident
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
-
Illegal Possessions:
Exhibit A: N/A
Legal Possessions:
Exhibit A: Water
Exhibit B: Necklace
Exhibit C: Crowbar
Exhibit D: GPS
Exhibit E: Map
Exhibit F: Radio
Exhibit G: Bag
Exhibit H: ZipTie
Exhibit I: Gloves
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Incident Date: 05/NOV/2024
Witness Information
- Name: Stan Foxx
Date of Birth: 21/JUN/1998
Phone Number: 214-9586
Occupation: Police Officer III, Los Santos Police Department
Witness Statement
- On 05/NOV/2024, my unit 3-K-11 responded to a 911 call about a store robbery at 24/7 on Palomino Freeway. After looking at the CCTV, four suspects robbed the store, two of whom were not in masks and were identified as Doris and Jack Ramsterpegthorp. To 100% confirm my identification of both suspects, I also had Officer Lue Washington look over the footage and BOLO that I placed. He also stated that it was 100% Doris and Jack Ramsterpegthorp. Both suspects were arrested later in the day on Great Ocean Highway as they seemed to have a broken-down vehicle. The CCTV footage has been provided at the bottom of this statement.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Stan Foxx, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,

Stan Foxx
Police Officer III
Los Santos Police Department
Date: 12/NOV/2021
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Incident Date: 05/NOV/2024
Witness Information
- Name: Lue Washington
Date of Birth: 15/OCT/1996
Phone Number: 571-3202
Occupation: Police Officer III, Los Santos Police Department
Witness Statement
- This situation starts with me standing in the bullpen in Mission Row station. Stan Foxx walks up to me with a laptop in his hand and asks me to take a look at some footage and asked if I saw anything wrong. I watch the CCTV footage and immediately knew what he was talking about. The footage showed an Unmasked Doris and Jack Ramsterpegthorp robbing a store. Clear as day. It was them. From clothing to facial structure. I gave him the laptop back and said "Yeah thats freaking Doris and Jack" and he confirmed that's what he saw too, he just wanted to make sure his eyes weren't playing games on him. I went back out in the field and started to look for the pair considering I know them very well. I visited a friend at LSC and asked if he saw them to give me a call and my friend then immediately informs me that Jack and Doris just placed a mechanic request, my friend gave me the location and I arrived with Stan Foxx and additional units to detain the couple. They were successfully detained but they 100% denied it was them and they said that they were being copy catted and set up around the city. Stan and I both agree'd that the evidence we had in hand was too damning and that it would and should be fought in court. Like I said - Unless these doubles, literally had plastic surgery to match Jack and Doris' facial features, then I don't personally buy the story. The CCTV footage was CLEAR as day, UNMASKED, caught in 4K.
CCTV: 
Witness Affirmation
- I, Lue Washington, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,
Lue Washington
Police Officer III
Los Santos Police Department
Date: 13/NOV/2024
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Incident Date: 05/NOV/2024
Witness Information
- Name: Luca Andollini
Date of Birth: 06/JUN/1995
Phone Number: 530 8359
Occupation: Police Officer, Los Santos Police Department
Witness Statement
- On the date of the incident, Officer Foxx called in over the radio to be on the lookout for the suspects Doris and Jack Ramsterpegthorp as he identified them via CCTV footage from a store that was robbed. Officer Fox placed the warrant for the arrest and another unit called out the potential location of the suspects. I responded as backup unit and after arriving on scene - detained Jack Ramsterpegthorp. At that time, Jack Ramsterpegthorp had a machete in their possession - a blade longer than 3 inches and was wearing identical clothes as seen in the CCTV from the store robbery. Other units took over the transport and arrest procedure.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Luca Andollini, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,

Luca Andollini
Police Officer III
Los Santos Police Department
Date: 13/NOV/2024
Junior Prosecutor
San Andreas Judicial Branch
514-3247 —
[email protected]

Re: #25-BT-0034 State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 07 May 2025, 22:13
by Adithya Ramesh

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
#25-BT-0034
A Motion for Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 7 MAY, 2025.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: Death of the Defendant
Detailed Explanation:
The defendant is deceased, and prosecution cannot lawfully continue. The State requests Involuntary Dismissal to close the case.
Junior Prosecutor
San Andreas Judicial Branch
514-3247 — [email protected]

Re: #25-BT-0034 State of San Andreas v. Doris Ramsterpegthorp
Posted: 08 May 2025, 02:06
by Sayaka Yukimura