Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Locked
tigerpet15
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 2:27 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Peter King

Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by tigerpet15 »

Image
Image
Defendants Name: Peter King
Defendants Phone: 4048796
Defendants Address: -
Requested Attorney: Oliver Jenkins
Image
Department: LSPD

Officer/Deputy 1
Badge Number: -
Rank & Name: Detective Dominic Ace
Image
Time & Date of Incident(s): 27.1.2022 arrested, charges put into a system 6.1.2022
Charge(s) Being Appealed: Failiure to comply/identify, Burgulary (maybe some more I dont know about)
Narrative: On 27th of January I was arrested after my car was being unimpounded by a LSSD deputy Zeje Stephens for previously mentioned charges. Id like to point out best preformance of the deputy because he didnt arrested me right away but instead of that he took me to the police station and talked with me about the cahrges gave me the needed information about my arrest warant. The strange thing is that I dont remember commiting any of those crimes actually dont think I was in the city at the time. That gives me reasonable believe that those might be just corrupted case against me or that officer made a mistake and chared me with crimes I didnt commit. I d love to go to court and make Dominic Ace prove his charges. Thank you



I, Peter King, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Image
Last edited by Judith Mason on Tue Feb 22, 2022 3:58 am, edited 6 times in total.
Reason: Assigned Docket Number
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: Peter King vs LSPD

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: Peter King vs LSPD
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Mr. King,

    Currently you have several mistakes in your appeal, however I will be giving you a chance to correct them;
    • Incorrect title format (See "Court of Appeals Information & Filing Format")
    • Please name your attorney so the court is aware of your representation.
    • Dates, you have listed the year as 2021 on 2 occasions.
    • General formatting of the appeal. (Several things are bolded when they shouldn't be; Name, Phone number, Time & Date, Charges, & Narrative.)
    I will be giving you 48 hours to amend these mistakes or the appeal will be denied.

    Thank you.

    From
    Image
    Chief Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Oliver Jenkins
Master EMT
Posts: 1764
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 5:58 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Prezeey

LSEMS Awards

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #

Post by Oliver Jenkins »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Your Honor,

    As I am now in a Director position, I am no longer able to take this case. I will however talk to Mr. King about requesting a different attorney.

    Best Regards,

    Image
    Oliver Jenkins
    Director of the Bar Association
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by Judith Mason »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Parties,

    I am Associate Justice Judith Mason and I will be presiding over this case. At this point in time, the case is now considered ACTIVE and it has been assigned docket number 22-01-31-AP-029.

    As we do not have counsel for either side, I will be reaching out to the necessary individuals in order to get that appropriate representation appointed. Once that has been accomplished, the discovery phase will open and I will begin hearing motions from both parties.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Albert Lewis
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:57 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by Albert Lewis »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Your Honor,

    My name is Albert "Big Al" Lewis and i will be taking over as acting counsel for the Los Santos Police Department in this case. I shall speak with my client in preparations for upcoming motions.

  • Respectfully,
    Image
    Albert "Big Al" Lewis
    State Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch

    464-6046
Image
User avatar
Darcy Valor
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:36 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by Darcy Valor »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch


"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judith Mason,

    I will be acting as counsel for Mr. Peter King in this case. I am familiarizing myself with the case and will be contacting my client for more information.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Darcy Lafleur
    Attorney at Law
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 241-7634 [email protected]
Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
Training & Hiring Staff
Bar Ethics Review Board
Online
Sai Modi
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:12 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

DOC Awards

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by Sai Modi »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Your Honor,

    My name is Sai Modi and I will act as primary counsel for the Los Santos Police Department in this case alongside Counselor Lewis as my co-counsel. I am familiarizing myself with the case and will be reaching out to the client to gather more information.

Respectfully,

Image
Sai Modi
Attorney-at-Law
Police Prosecution District
San Andreas Judicial Branch

364-9436
Image
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by Judith Mason »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Parties,

    It is my understanding that the appointed counsel for the appellant is having trouble getting in contact with their client. I am hereby ordering that the appellant either get into contact with the court or with his appointed attorney Darcy Lafleur confirming that he wishes to move forward with this case. If a response is not received by the end of the day on Friday, March 11th, this case will be dismissed.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: Peter King v. Police Department | Docket #22-01-31-AP-029

Post by Judith Mason »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

COURT DECISION - #22-01-31-AP-029

IN THE APPEALS COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

Peter King v. Los Santos Police Department
#22-01-31-AP-029


CHARGES BEING APPEALED:
GF15 - Burglary
GM11 - Failure to Comply/Identify

A decision was reached in the above case on the 12th day of March, 2022.

  • The case of #22-01-31-AP-029 Peter King v. Los Santos Police Department has hereby been dismissed by this court.

    The appellant in this case has failed to respond to multiple attempts by his attorney to communicate and discuss the details of his case and, therefore, appropriate representation cannot be obtained in order to ensure a fair trial. As such, this court will make no determinations of the guilt or innocence of Mr. King.


    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Appeal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests