Page 1 of 2
Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 6:53 pm
by Osama Bakir
San Andreas Judicial Branch
[SAJB] Appeals Court
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
Personal Information:
DEFENDANTS NAME: Osama Bakir
DEFENDANTS PHONE: 5138937
DEFENDANTS ADDRESS: Eclipse Towers, Apt. 409
ATTORNEY NAME:Unknown
ATTORNEY PHONE: Unknown
General Information:
OFFICERS NAME: N/A (N/A If Unknown)
RANK: OMEGA-1 (N/A If Unknown)
BADGE NUMBER: 524
ATTORNEY NAME: n/a
ATTORNEY PHONE:n/a
Incident Information:
(s):
CHARGES BEING APPEALED: Reckless Operation, which lead to me failing parole, and receiving all my charges from prior actions
DEFENDANTS STORY/OPENING STATEMENTS: I was driving down Senora Freeway, southbound. After having been pulled over by OMEGA-1, I give him my license and explain the situation. Omega 1 then goes and back to his cruiser and deliberates what punishment to give me. After his long and hard deliberations, he steps out of his cruiser and informs me that I am going to be arrested on the baises of reckless operation. I comply with everything I am told but ask for Omega-1's badge number. I then ask what speed he clocked me going, and he replies with 175. I am contesting these charges as 1, going 30kph above the speed limit does not entail a 3rd-degree speeding ticket, LET ALONE a reckless operation charge, and secondly, these charges have unfortunately caused me to fail my parole, which has put me in jail for a long time, (any evidence attached must pertain to or somehow involve the situation)
Signed,
Osama Bakir
2
Re: Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal | 9/25/2021
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:25 am
by Zachary LaBlaze
Re: Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal | 9/25/2021
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 2:28 pm
by Bret Hyland
Re: Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal | 9/25/2021
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 5:14 pm
by Osama Bakir
I will be self-representing myself!
[21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:57 pm
by Hank Holt
San Andreas Judicial Branch
[21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- Mr. Bakir, Counselor Lablaze,
Good afternoon. As per the directions of Judge Hyland, I have been assigned to this case. Mr. Bakir, you should be advised that you can be assigned an attorney free of charge on behalf of the state should you wish it. If not, I will proceed with this case on the assumption that you waive your right to counsel willingly, which is not a course of action that I recommend you take lightly. In either case, please confirm with this court whenever you wish to continue to self-represent yourself or have an Attorney assigned on your behalf.
I will set a tentative hearing date of Sunday the 17th at 8 PM ((UTC)). I expect both the Appellant and the Respondent to have any and all submissions they wish to have considered ready by that date. Should either the Appellant or Respondent need any information from the adverse party, you may file motions for discovery on this docket. Any and all submissions that will be presented at the hearing will need to be submitted on this docket before-hand.
Should the hearing date need to be re-scheduled, please let me know.
- Respectfully,
Hank Holt
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:59 pm
by Zachary LaBlaze
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Osama Bakir v Los Santos Sheriff's Department
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- Your Honor,
The prosecution would like to submit into evidence the following:
- Statement from LSSD Sheriff [REDACTED] regarding Osama Bakir's September 25th arrest
REDACTED wrote:
Los Santos County Sheriff's Department
Re: Osama Bakir v Los Santos Sheriffs Department | Representatio
"A TRADITION OF SERVICE" |
October 16th, 2021
District Attorney LaBlaze,
On September 25th I was posted on the side of Senora Freeway, opposite to the scrap yard, when a pink Rebla GTS, registered to Osama Bakir, sped past me at speeds exceeding 170km/h. I immediately started to follow Mr. Bakir and was reaching speeds of 205km/h while trailing Mr. Bakir before he eventually reduced his speed significantly and came to a stop next to Paul's Farm where I conducted the 10-55. Upon checking the MDC I learned that Mr. Bakir was currently on active parole. I quickly read his parole form and found that, amongst other things, Mr. Bakir was at the time on parole for reckless operation and felony evading. After I radioed my situation to dispatch, Assistant Sheriff [REDACTED] informed me that he too clocked Mr. Bakir on the opposite lane in speeds in excess of 190km/h. I informed Mr. Bakir that I clocked him in excess of 170km/h initially but he fails to mention that he was also informed of my second reading when trailing him and he also fails to mention Assistant Sherriff [REDACTED]'s prior reading.
I proceeded to talk to Mr. Bakir where he swiftly informed me that the reason he was speeding is that the speed limit is "too slow" and he confirmed that he in fact always speeds and sees no point in following the road law as he thinks it is "stupid".
After I went back to my cruiser, and after having read the parole form once more, I made the decision to charge Mr. Bakir with both, Speeding 3rd degree for the excessive speed he was confirmed doing from multiple peers, and with Reckless Operation for the manner in which he was driving and his open disregard for the safety of others around him. Mr. Bakir was on parole for these very same offenses and still did not learn from his past mistakes, continuing to drive in a manner which endagers others. It is to my understanding that the charges were applied correctly to a repeat offender in compliance with the penal code descriptions with no room for leniency while on active parole.
Attached you will find my bodycam recording of the conversation I have had with Mr. Bakir during the 10-55.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_T-Z4aRz-w0
- From
Sheriff [REDACTED]
Los Santos County Sheriff's Department
[REDACTED]
- Footage from LSSD Sheriff[REDACTED]'s body camera detailing the interaction between the Sheriff and Mr. Bakir
Relevance:
Sheriff [REDACTED]'s statement will provide an account of Mr. Bakir's dangerous and reckless operation of a motor vehicle leading to his September 25th arrest. The accompanying body camera footage will show that the appellant admits that he was speeding, and provides no excuse for his actions.
From
District Attorney Zachary LaBlaze
District Attorney's Office
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 5:48 am
by Hank Holt
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 5:15 pm
by Osama Bakir
Dear Hank Holt, after many a thought, i have decided to appoint you as my attorney
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 6:52 pm
by Hank Holt
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:42 pm
by Colt Daniels
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:01 pm
by Colt Daniels
Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery
Honorable : Hank Holt
- We the defense in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
Osama Bakir vs. the LSSD
Assigned Court Case Number: [21-10-12-AP-009]
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Colt Daniels, Osama Bakir
Discovery from: LSSD
Type of Discovery: Document Request
- The parole contract for Osama Bakir
Detailed reasoning:
- I believe the conditions of his parole will be outlined in his parole contract, sense my client was charged causing him to fail his parole we would like a copy of the contract.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely
District Criminal Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 —
[email protected]
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:18 pm
by Hank Holt
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 11:04 pm
by Hank Holt
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 8:32 am
by Judith Mason
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 3:27 am
by Colt Daniels
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 4:59 am
by Ophelia Panes
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 2:20 am
by Ophelia Panes
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 3:42 am
by Colt Daniels
Form 3.0.5 - Motion to Suppress
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Honorable :
Judith Mason
- We the defense in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.
Assigned Court Case Number: 21-10-12-AP-009
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Colt Daniels, Osama Bakir
Requested Evidence to Suppress: Bodycam Footage 1:19 - 1:36
Detailed explanation: Sheriff Wallace asked Mr. Osama Bakir questions in regards to a criminal investigation in the hopes or desire to use my clients statements as evidence against him before my client was read his rights.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely
District Criminal Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 —
[email protected]
Re: [21-10-12-AP-009] Osama Bakir | Charges Appeal
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:08 pm
by Colt Daniels
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:39 pm
by Judith Mason
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- To whom it may concern,
First off, I'd like to thank everybody for their patience in this matter.
Secondly, I would like to confirm representation for both sides as it has been some time since the beginning of this case. Am I still correct in stating that representation for Mr. Bakir is Attorney Fitz Keegan, and representation for the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department is Attorney Ophelia Panes? Please confirm this in a response to the public docket.
Next, I see a Motion to Suppress evidence in regards to a portion of the bodycamera footage provided by the Sheriff. I am inclined to grant this motion on the grounds that Mr. Bakir had not been read his rights and thus his statements made prior to the reading of his rights would be considered inadmissible at trial. Unless the prosecution is able to present an argument to contest this, that is how the court will be moving forward at this time.
Finally, I would ask that when counsel for both sides respond to this message confirming their representation, that they make it known to the court if they have any additional motions they would like to submit, or if they are ready to proceed to trial.
Respectfully,
Judith Mason
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:52 am
by John Wallace
Los Santos County Sheriff's Department
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
"A TRADITION OF SERVICE" |
January 19th, 2022
Court Clerk Mason,
We have been unable to get in contact with Ms. Panes for multiple weeks as she neither returns our calls nor emails. Therefore, we do not consider us currently represented within this matter and request the court to assign proper representation to us.
Since we are currently not represented in this court, I am hereby requesting the motion to suppress evidence to be denied. The motion presented has no legal basis. There is no law or regulation in the State of San Andreas which requires miranda rights to be read during a traffic stop. Further, the Sheriff's Department operates within regulations approved by the Board of Commissioners which state:
3.6 Traffic Stop Protocol:
"At every stage of the Traffic Stop, the suspect is legally considered to be detained. If they request information on why you initiated the Traffic Stop, you can inform them at the time or later in the situation. You can also ask the driver to give their opinion on why they have been stopped, often providing additional evidence or even a confession for offenses the officer may not have directly witnessed."
The Board of Commissioners has approved this procedure and does not require any additional miranda rights.
We ask therefore, that the motion to suppress evidence is denied for not being based on any legal, approved and acknowledged procedure or law in the State of San Andreas.
- From
Sheriff John Wallace
Los Santos County Sheriff's Department
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:59 am
by Judith Mason
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:17 pm
by Hugh Allgood
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:31 am
by Judith Mason
Re: Osama Bakir v. Sheriff's Department | Docket #21-10-12-AP-009
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 3:14 am
by Judith Mason