Page 1 of 1
#26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 03 Apr 2026, 08:23
by Daniel Carmello
Defendant Name: Faris Jo
Defendant Phone: 4805420
(( Defendant Discord: grass971 ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT +4 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney - Carmello Consults
Charging Department: LSPD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 01/APR/2026
Charge(s):
Narrative:
My client believes he was wrongfully arrested
I,
Daniel Carmello, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))

Re: State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 04 Apr 2026, 02:12
by Hope Kant

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
#26-BT-0034
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 4th day of April, 2026.
The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.
Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

Re: State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 04 Apr 2026, 02:12
by Hope Kant

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
#26-BT-0034
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 4th day of April, 2026.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.
The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue
Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

Re: #26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 03 May 2026, 05:16
by Rowin Lawson

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
#26-BT-0034
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 3rd day of May, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
ARREST REPORT
MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
Full Name: Faris Jo
Telephone Number: 4805420
Licenses Suspended: Yes
Charges:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- GF10 - Grand Theft
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
- Vehicle A: Shinobi | Dark Purple | LP: N/A | VIN: 1KFDSDXA8BRLVA000 | RO: Hope Linde
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Hans Waltz
Badge Number: 19302
Callsign: 241L
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2026-04-01
Deputies Involved: Frank Peters, PD
Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
- While chasing one ATM, another one was called out, and units diverted to the other ATM due to the first one ending. AIRSD had visual first and began chasing the suspect, who went to the dam and detached the ATM. After detaching from the ATM, AIRSD continued following the suspect down the dirt path northbound. Sergeant Waltz came up on that same dirt patch just behind him and began pursuing the vehicle. After going from the dirt path to the highway, PD joined in, and we continued with the pursuit. After some time while pursuing the Kamacho, they stopped at Bennys, and the driver hopped out, switching from a Kamacho to a shinobi. PD deployed a shinobi and continued the pursuit. After some time, the suspect went to the docks near the truckers' yard. The suspect began going in circles before TC'ing into a Fence. PD tased them off the bike and cuffed them. He was brought to DOC.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: N/A
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 -
[email protected]

Re: #26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 03 May 2026, 23:06
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF SCHEDULING
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
#26-BT-0034
An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 3rd day of May, 2026.
All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.
In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.
In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.
If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.
Respectfully,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected] 
Re: #26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 04 May 2026, 21:45
by Daniel Carmello
Re: #26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 04 May 2026, 21:50
by Daniel Carmello
Re: #26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 06 May 2026, 18:35
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF TRIAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
#26-BT-0034
A trial date was set on the above case on the 6th day of May, 2026.
In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 03:00 AM on 16th day of May, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.
Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.
So ordered,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

Re: #26-BT-0034, State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
Posted: 16 May 2026, 03:53
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Faris Jo
#26-BT-0034
A decision was reached in the above case on the 16th day of May, 2026.
The defendant's counsel has failed to attend court as per the instructions in the Notice of Trial, despite being granted a liberal window for tardiness. Therefore, the defense attorney, Daniel Carmello, shall be fined $15000 for the inconvenience they caused to the Court and the respectful employees involved.
The Court furthermore advises counsel to either recuse themselves from the case or to appear on time, as instructed. No further alternatives or room for delay will be considered. Failure to do so will result in additional fines and/or a report to the Bar Association.
A new scheduling notice shall be sent out shortly.
So Ordered,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
