Page 1 of 1
#26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 01 Apr 2026, 21:26
by Joseph Horton
Document 1 | Filed 29/MAR/2026 | Page 1 of 3
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#26-CM-0009
Date Filed:
29/MAR/2026
Violations:
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
GM13 - Criminal Threats
GM19 - Face Concealment
GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
GF18 - Racketeering
Accessory to SF02 - Murder
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Government Employee
SF04 - Kidnapping
SF05 - Torture
v.
Lewis Langley
INDICTMENT
- THE PROSECUTION CHARGES THAT:
- Detective Knight conducted an investigation into Lewis Langley regarding alleged misuse of state property, false statements, and involvement in organized criminal activity.
- On August 16, 2025, Langley reported that he had been kidnapped.
- Investigation reportedly identified inconsistencies in Langley’s statement and a lack of physical evidence supporting the claim.
- Investigators determined that Langley allegedly coordinated the release and use of a state-issued vehicle, which he improperly retained and attempted to conceal.
- Langley reportedly also provided inconsistent statements regarding a firearm allegedly placed in a vehicle at Benny’s Motorworks.
- Law enforcement later located the vehicle, and a K9 search reportedly resulted in the recovery of an AP pistol.
- A witness, Leo Devil, reported that Langley had previously made threats against him and directed acts of violence.
- Devil further reported that when attempting to document such conduct, an associate of Langley forcibly seized and destroyed his phone.
- Shortly after cooperating with law enforcement, Leo Devil was reportedly kidnapped by individuals associated with Langley, transported to a secured location, restrained, and threatened.
- Further investigation indicates that Langley, during his tenure as Governor, allegedly coordinated and directed acts of kidnapping, torture, and murder through associates.
- A witness, Lester Conway, reported being present for multiple such incidents and described a pattern of retaliatory violence carried out under Langley’s direction.
- On December 15, 2025, Conway was reportedly ambushed outside City Hall by multiple armed individuals, abducted, and transported to a secondary location.
- Investigators report that Conway was subsequently tortured and killed at that location. Law enforcement recovered blood evidence reportedly matching Conway, along with ballistic evidence consistent with the weapons used.
- Based on the totality of the investigation, investigators assert probable cause that Lewis Langley engaged in organized criminal activity involving deception, threats, kidnapping, torture, murder, and the destruction and concealment of evidence.
- Presiding:
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Document 2 | Filed 29/MAR/2026 | Page 2 of 3
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#26-CM-0009
Date Filed:
29/MAR/2026
Violations:
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
GM13 - Criminal Threats
GM19 - Face Concealment
GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
GF18 - Racketeering
Accessory to SF02 - Murder
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Government Employee
SF04 - Kidnapping
SF05 - Torture
v.
Lewis Langley
NOTICE TO RESPOND
- Notice is given that Lewis Langley is ordered to respond using the Plea Form below between the dates of;
Or make contract with the presiding judge;
For the purpose of an Arraignment.
Failure to comply with this notice may result in additional charges and/or detainment by law enforcement.
- Presiding:
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Document 3 | Filed 29/MAR/2026 | Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#26-CM-0009
Date Filed:
29/MAR/2026
Violations:
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
GM13 - Criminal Threats
GM19 - Face Concealment
GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
GF18 - Racketeering
Accessory to SF02 - Murder
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Government Employee
SF04 - Kidnapping
SF05 - Torture
v.
Lewis Langley
ARRAIGNMENT FORM
- Lewis Langley you are facing misdemeanor and felony charges for alleged conducts that have occurred since the 17th of January, 2026.
This form will formally read you the charges filed against you. You may plead in one of three ways for each charge:
- Guilty
A plea of guilty indicates to the court that you confirm your guilt of the alleged conduct that was in violation of Penal Code. If you plead guilty, the charge and fines will be placed on your record and you will have to turn yourself into law enforcement.
- Not Guilty
A plea of not guilty indicates to the court that you dispute the charges being filed against you. If you plead not guilty, preliminary pretrial proceedings will begin and a criminal trial will be scheduled in the near future.
- No Contest
A plea of no contest is similar to that of a guilty plea, but indicates to the court that you accept the conviction, with the exception of avoiding a factual admission of guilt. If you plead no contest, the charge and fines will similarly be placed on your record and you will have to turn yourself into law enforcement.
Before the court can accept a plea of guilty or no contest, you must be advised of your rights in this situation.
- You have the right to plead not guilty to any and all of these charges.
- You have the right to be represented by counsel at trial and at every other stage of the proceedings.
- You have the right to testify and present any evidence of your own in your defense against these charges.
- You also have the right to not testify during any of the proceedings in accordance with your right to remain silent.
- Please be advised that anything you say or do during the proceedings can and will be used against you by the prosecution.
Lewis Langley, please be aware that any plea you give must be made voluntarily and of your own volition, and did not result from force, threats, or promises made by any person, with the exception of a Plea Agreement that can be arranged between yourself and the prosecution.
Count 1 is NM03 - Unlawful Assembly, a misdemeanor charge punishable by 15 months of incarceration and a fine of $1,000.
Count 2 is GM13 - Criminal Threats, a misdemeanor charge punishable by 20 months of incarceration and a fine of $1,000.
Count 3 is GM19 - Face Concealment (b), a misdemeanor charge punishable by 10 months of incarceration and a fine of $500.
Count 4 is GF16 - Tampering with Evidence, a felony charge punishable by 45 months of incarceration and a fine of $3,000.
Count 5 is GF18 - Racketeering, a felony charge punishable by 60 months of incarceration and a fine of $3,000.
Count 6 is Accessory to SF02 - Murder, a felony charge punishable by 45 months of incarceration and a fine of $4,500.
Count 7 is SF04 - Kidnapping of a Government Employee, a felony charge punishable by 70 months of incarceration and a fine of $10,000.
Count 8 is SF04 - Kidnapping, a felony charge punishable by 105 months of incarceration and a fine of $15,000.
Count 9 is to SF05 - Torture, a felony misdemeanor charge punishable by 90 months of incarceration and a fine of $12,000.
The prosecuting is seeking a total of 460 months of incarceration and a total fine of $50,000.
With all previous information in mind, please make your formal plea using the following form;
Code: Select all
[img]https://i.imgur.com/UM5h3vl.png[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/6h9z9Jh.png[/img]
[divbox=antiquewhite]
[b]Defendant Name:[/b] Firstname Lastname
[b]Defendant Phone:[/b] ###-####
[b]Defendant Address:[/b] Here
[b][color=#0040FF](([/color] Defendant Discord:[/b] Here [color=#0040FF][b]))[/b][/color]
[b]Requested Attorney:[/b] [i]N/A if none[/i]
[/divbox]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/F76nFHB.png[/img]
[divbox=antiquewhite]
[b]On the charge of NM03 - Unlawful Assembly, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of GM13 - Criminal Threats, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of GF16 - Tampering with Evidence, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of GF18 - Racketeering, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of Accessory to SF02 - Murder, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of SF04 - Kidnapping, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of SF04 - Kidnapping of a Government Employee, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[b]On the charge of to SF05 - Torture, I am entering a plea as follows:[/b]
[list=none]
[ ] Guilty
[ ] Not Guilty
[ ] No Contest
[/list]
[hr][/hr]
I, [b]FIRSTNAME LASTNAME[/b], hereby affirm that this pleading is being made voluntarily and of my own volition, and did not result from force, threats, or promises made by any person, with the exception of a Plea Agreement arranged between myself and the prosecution.
[/divbox]
- Presiding:
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 12 Apr 2026, 17:20
by Rowin Lawson
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION TO AMEND
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
#26-CM-0009
A Motion to Amend was filed in the above case on the 6th day of April, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Amend the original charges with the underlined amended charges.
- Original Charges
- GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
- GF18 - Racketeering
- Accessory to SF02 - Murder
- SF04 - Kidnapping
- SF04 - Kidnapping (Gov. Emp.)
- SF05 - Torture
- GM13 - Criminal Threats
- GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
- NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
- Amended Charges
- Accessory to SF02 - Murder (Gov. Emp.)
- Accessory to SF05 - Torture (Gov. Emp.)
- NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
- SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
- Accessory to SF02 - Murder
- Accessory to SF04 - Kidnapping (Gov. Emp.)
- Accessory to SF05 - Torture (Gov. Emp.)
- GF09 - Embezzlement
- GM13 - Criminal Threats
- Accessory to Aggravated SF02 - Murder (Gov. Emp.)
- GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
- SF04 - Kidnapping (Gov. Emp.)
- GF18 - Racketeering
- Detailed Explanation: Due to a clerical error, a mistake was made in the charges that were submitted.
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 15 Apr 2026, 00:08
by Lewis Langley
I plead not guilty to all charges. Can the court consider giving me additional time because I think my lawyers dead. I might need to find a new one.
On a mobile device, please excuse my brevity
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 25 Apr 2026, 22:29
by Joseph Horton
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 26 Apr 2026, 20:51
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
#26-CM-0009
A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2026.
I, Hugh R. Allgood, Chief Public Defender of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Lewis Langley, in the underlying case.
I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.
Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 27 Apr 2026, 01:57
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
#26-BT-0009
A Motion to Compel Discovery was filed in the above case on the 27th day of April, 2026.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;
- Requested Discovery: All evidence
- Detailed Reasoning: Mr. Langley has been indicated on charges and has entered his not guilty plea. So his defense team can begin preparations on the case, we request the Court to order discovery.
Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 27 Apr 2026, 08:32
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
#26-CM-0009
An Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 27th day of April, 2026.
The prosecution is hereby ordered to submit the majority of their evidence, including all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within fourteen (14) days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.
Additionally, the defense is also hereby ordered to provide all evidence intended for trial via a Motion for Discovery. Any remaining evidence or supplemental submissions by either party must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the scheduled Motions hearing.
Both parties are also ordered to provide an initial witness list to the Court. Any required amendments to the witness list shall be filed through a separate motion ahead of the Motions hearing.
Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket, parties can begin filing motions they intend to be heard at the Motions hearing. Parties should not be filing objections or rebuttals to Motions as this will be addressed during the Motions hearing.
All submissions to the docket must be filed filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the scheduled Motions hearing.
So ordered,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0009 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
Posted: 12 May 2026, 18:36
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley
#26-CM-0009
A Motion for Involuntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 12th day of May, 2026.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: On the 27th of April, 2026, Defense Counsel filed a Motion to compel discovery. This motion was filed with the intent on asserting the Defendant's 6th Constitutional right to a "speedy and public trial", rather than wait for the Court to order discovery on their own accord. Again, the Defendant asserts this right, and does not request it at the leisure of the State, or from this Court for that matter.
On the same day, this Court ordered the state to submit "the majority of their evidence, including all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency" within 14 days, and if additional time was needed to file for a continuance. This means the deadline for this order was the 11th of May.
It is the 12th of May, and no discovery and no request for a continuance was made or accepted.
The Defense would also like to point out on the record this case stemmed from an original bench trial case, #26-BT-0008. In the verdict on this case, your Honor dismissed the charges against the Defendant without prejudice. The Court also made several key findings on the record. First, the Court found the State violated the Defendant's right to counsel when the Defendant was extradited to China, which was only remedied when the Defendant was returned back to San Andreas and put on parole. Secondly, the Court aimed to "reset the procedural posture" of the case to allow for the State to refile the charges against the Defendant in a way in which the Defendant's rights were not only protected, but respected. The Court ordered the State to proceed with the case via indictment within 14 days of this ruling, which the State did adhere to based on filing dates on the indictment.
The Defense would like to highlight a critical piece of this indictment,
The Court notes, that should the State fail to file an indictment within the allotted fourteen-day period, the Court will interpret that failure as an abandonment of prosecution in the matter of #26-BT-0008 State of San Andreas v. Lewis Langley, but not the other cases. In that event, the Court will proceed with issuing orders returning any fees/compensation associated with this case to the Defendant and awarding monetary compensation reflecting the time the Defendant has already served as a result of the charges.
Although this is directly referring to the properly filed indictment preceding the initiation of this present case, the Defense believes the contextual framework has been laid for supporting this motion to involuntarily dismiss. The Court aimed to "reset the procedural posture" of the case by giving the State an opportunity to 'try again', and here we are again with the "procedural posture" still going down the same path was the preceding case. The Defense believes with the Defendant's assertion of their rights to a speedy trial and with the State failing to comply with the order of the Court, the State has effectively abandoned the prosecution against the Defendant. In anticipation of the State arguing against this being their intent, the Defense also believes this Court should take punitive measures against the State to address what has now become a cumulative encroachment of the Constitutional rights of the Defendant. As a reminder, the first case (26-BT-0008) was dismissed without prejudice to "reset the procedural posture". However, as the Constitutional violations have persisted, the Defense is now asking for the case to be dismissed with prejudice to prevent any furtherance of Constitutional violations. The Defense sees this as the only remedy to ensure the Defendant's rights will be protected by the State is to cease this prosecution.
Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 - [email protected]