Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Charlie Belle
Defendant Phone: 283-9593
(( Defendant Discord: jellyfaun#9141 ))
(( Defendant Timezone: EST ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 24/02/2026 22:50 and 22:49 and 22:48
Charge(s):

• GM13 - Criminal Threats of a Government Employee
• WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
• GM04 - Resisting Arrest
• VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle

Narrative:
My Client feels they have been wrongfully charged

---

I, Luna McMillan, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Charlie Belle is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The Court notes that the Defendant pled guilty to the charge of WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm, though it is listed on the initial submission, meaning this charge cannot be contested.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest report

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Police Officer III+1 Cody James
      Callsign: 4-D-11
      
      Date of Arrest: 24/FEB/2026
      Officers Involved:
      • Chief of Police Phillipe Sanchez
      • Deputy Chief Jessica Nash
      • Police Officer II Rafael Mendoza
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      Police Officer Cody James was on scene assisting with an active police situation at the intersection of Alta Street and Vespucci Boulevard, where the roadway was partially blocked with emergency lights, sirens, and traffic barriers in place. During this active scene, a female later identified as Charlie Belle was observed driving a sport utility vehicle in the incorrect lane of travel before making an unsafe U-turn and parking directly behind a marked police cruiser with its emergency lights and sirens activated. Officer James issued clear and lawful verbal commands for Belle to leave the area due to the active police scene, which she initially complied with; however, Belle immediately conducted another unsafe U-turn and struck the blue traffic barriers with her vehicle. Belle then exited the vehicle, at which point Officer James attempted to place her under arrest. During the arrest, Belle was extremely non-compliant, refused to follow lawful orders, and actively resisted, requesting a supervisor to respond. Chief Jessica Nash and Chief Phillipe Sanchez arrived on scene and made contact with Belle, during which Belle admitted to driving recklessly through the active scene. While handcuffed, Belle intentionally kicked Chief Nash and proceeded to issue verbal threats toward Chief Nash and her family and even kicked Chief Nash. A search of the vehicle Belle was operating revealed a Pistol .50 located in the glove compartment, for which Belle did not have lawful authorization. Belle continued to resist custody and kicked Officer James during escort and transport procedures. Belle was subsequently secured and transported by Officer James to the DOC.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Charlie Belle
      Phone Number: 2839593
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • GM13 - Criminal Threats of a Government Employee
      • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
      • GM02 - Battery of a Government Employee
      • GM04 - Resisting Arrest
      • VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      Exhibit B: Serial number: 1770593424574; Weapon: Pistol .50
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2 Witness Statement Deputy Nash

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 25/FEB/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Jessica Nash
    Date of Birth: REDACTED
    Phone Number: REDACTED
    Occupation: Deputy Chief, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • On the 24th of February in the Late Evening, shots were heard at Benny's. A vehicle was followed from the scene and it turned into a shootout between a dangerous gang and the LSPD which resulted in a static scene on Elgin Ave between the San Andreas & Vespucci Blvd Intersections. It was in the North facing Lane, and as such, blockades were placed on the southern end (Where traffic would be coming from) and police vehicles were at the north end.
    
    Ms Belle entered the scene slowly at first from the North end (Heading south in the incorrect lane and into the active static scene). She was told to leave but continued meddling and then eventually continued through the scene in the incorrect lane and almost struck an officer driving over the sidewalk. She was detained and arrested.
    
    Upon detainment she became verbally combative, spewing some abhorrent statements and acting like a petulant child. She then became physically abusive, striking me once.
    
    As she was placed into the car, she crossed the line by making statements to Chief of Police Phillipe Sanchez by making statements of "I'll bury your child 6 feet under". Which were disgusting and deeply personal. When asked what she'd said, she went on to further threaten my own life.
    
    I'm unsure what she is contesting here. She willingly stated she entered the incorrect lane of traffic, she obstructed our on-going investigation and scene, she became verbally and then physically combative and was a total, for lack of a better word, twat.
    
    This court case is a waste of time and a blatant attempt to get attention, to which she desperately seeks, which is apparent with her driving through an active scene. Unless she is blind (Which she shouldn't be driving is she is), she would have seen the emergency vehicles, flashing lights, blockades, officers walking around with heavy weaponry, ambulances and gunshot victims on the floor. Her need and cry for attention and validation superseeded anyone elses necessities.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Jessica Nash, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Deputy Chief Jessica Nash,
    Los Santos Police Department
    [/b]
    Date: 08/March/2026

  

• Exhibit #3 Witness Statement Detective James

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 24/FEB/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Cody James
    Date of Birth: 01/OCT/2000
    Phone Number: 312-6487
    Occupation: Police Officer III+1, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • The information given arrest report accurately reflects the events that occurred during the incident, including the defendant’s actions involving resisting arrest, kicking officers, issuing threats, and driving recklessly within the active police scene. She also kicked me twice while I was trying to get her processed at DOC as she kept on resisting saying she needed a "5 minute break" outside before she entered the intake room.
    
    Regarding bodycam footage, my body worn camera was active during the incident, however I do not have any footage saved or available to provide at this time.
    
    ((Proof of RP))

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Cody James, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Cody James
    Police Officer III+1
    Los Santos Police Department
    Date: 09/MAR/2026

  

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.

Please note: Defense, you are able to continue to submit motions up and until the trial has been scheduled. The trail was intentionally set with availability starting a week from today to accommodate for possible submissions.

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 02:30 AM on 17th day of April, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

---

---

---

---

• Defendant made a u-turn in the incorrect lane.
• One lane was blocked due to an on-going police scene.
• Defendant made another u-turn
• Defendant hit and broke a blue barrier.
• The defendant exited her vehicle of her own accord and was arrested.
• The defendant was non-compliant during arrest.
• The defendant made threats towards Deputy Chief Nash on scene

---

---

The prosecution asserts that the defendant knowingly drove in a reckless manner due to the multiple u-turns and breaking of the police barrier. They argue that the defendant willingly chose to enter an on-going police scene, and allege that an officer was nearly struck during this driving.

The defense argues that the defendant was merely driving in a careless manner, but it did not amount to the charge of reckless. The defendant claims that she initially approached the scene to greet an officer on scene and apologize for the traffic violation, then proceeded to leave.

---

---

The court wants to begin by noting the defendant only plead not guilty to some, but not all charges incurred on the day in question. Given that the court already accepted the guilty plea by the defendant for the charges WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm and GM02 - Battery (Gov. Emp.). The court will not be hearing those charges today. The court will move forward focusing on the charges GM04 - Resisting Arrest, GM13 - Criminal Threats (Gov. Emp.), and VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle.

That being said, the court finds that the inconsistencies between the arrest report and the witness statement, coupled with the inability for the defendant to drive in the correct lane due to police presence and an ongoing scene, allow for a reasonable person to find the defendant did not proceed with intent to harm individuals and/or property. While the defendant’s actions were improper and may warrant citation-level offenses, they do not rise to the level of willful or wanton disregard required for reckless operation.

However, despite the court’s finding that the underlying conduct did not rise to the level of reckless operation, the court finds the conduct of the defendant during said arrest to amount to a new, independent act chosen by the defendant. In exhibits 1 and 2 the defendant is noted as having threatened the Deputy Chief Nash. In exhibit 2 it is specifically stated that the defendant threatened the life of Deputy Chief Nash. While the court may understand a level of unruly conduct from an individual, it does not excuse or forgive direct threats to others.

The narrative surrounding the conduct of the defendant during the arrest amounts to a level the court can only see as resistance beyond what would be considered reasonable under the circumstances. The court notes the resistance in question led to multiple instances where the defendant was noted as striking officers to the point of supporting the already accepted charge of Battery.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle, I find the defendant, Charlie Belle, not guilty.
• On the count of GM13 - Criminal Threats (Gov. Emp.), I find the defendant, Charlie Belle, guilty.
• On the count of GM04 - Resisting Arrest, I find the defendant, Charlie Belle, guilty.

The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $17,000 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

So Ordered,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]