Eclipse Government

Defendant Name:Robin Bank
Defendant Phone: 2508323
(( Defendant Discord: is.ronin))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC+1))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Not sure yet

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 21/FEB/2025
Charge(s):

• Bank Robbery
• Evading
• The rest of the charges I received by the day of 21/FEB/2025

Narrative:

I was wrongfully charged and searched

---

I, Robin Bank, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

• Interested parties,
  
  The Court has removed the comment from the uninvolved party, Mr. Maverick Morgan, on the docket. Parties that are not involved should not comment on the docket, or they may face a contempt of court charge.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  This is a formal notice to the courts regarding an infraction committed by Maverick Morgan on the docket during the proceedings of #26-BT-0021 State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank, and is recorded as follows:
  
  1. Description of Infraction: Repeated submissions onto the Docket as an uninvolved party
  2. Action Taken: Charged with GM22 - Contempt of Court
  As a note, the additional reply has since been removed. Any further replies to the Docket from Mr. Morgan will result in a Felony Contempt of Court charge.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  This is a formal notice to the courts regarding an infraction committed by Maverick Morgan on the docket during the proceedings of #26-BT-0021 State of San Andreas v. Robin Bank, and is recorded as follows:
  
  1. Description of Infraction: Repeated submissions on the docket as an uninvolved party and death threats towards SAJB
  2. Action Taken: Charged with GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court
  As a note, the additional reply has since been removed.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an additional week to submit the discovery, we are waiting for evidence from the arresting department.

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

DEFENSE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

To the Honorable Court,

The Defense respectfully submits this response in opposition to the Prosecution’s Motion for Continuance filed on March 25, 2026.

The Prosecution has already been afforded a period of thirty (30) days to gather and produce discovery materials. This timeframe is more than sufficient under standard procedural expectations. Granting additional time would unjustifiably delay proceedings and prejudice the Defendant.

Furthermore, this case originates from what has been described, by the arresting officer, as an investigation conducted. As such, the evidence forming the basis of the charges should have been collected, reviewed, and readily available prior to the filing of said charges. The inability of the Prosecution to produce such evidence at this stage reflects a lack of due diligence rather than a legitimate need for additional time.


The Defense respectfully requests that this Honorable Court DENY the Prosecution’s Motion for Continuance.

---

Robin Bank
Wheelman - Midnight Club

---

---

The Court will accept the Motion for Continuance, given that it is the result of the arresting department, not the prosecution, and the short timeframe requested. Without exhibits or evidence by either party, no such prejudice can be found at this point for either party.

Additionally, the court notes that the preferences regarding the defendant and their representation have not been clarified. The court hereby instructs them to finalize, within the next week, how they will proceed vis-à-vis representation. This is also a reminder that a public attorney is available for consultation at no cost.

A continuance for one week is hereby granted.


So Ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest Report

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Mick Wegman
      Callsign: 3-A-12
      
      Date of Arrest: 21/FEB/2026
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Detective II Mick Wegman
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      On December 19, 2025, bank robbery at Legion Square involving the Mid Night Club, Robin Bank was identified as a primary suspect. During the incident, suspects reportedly held a victim at gunpoint before fleeing in a white La Coureuse registered to Robin Bank. Aerial surveillance tracked this vehicle north through Sandy Shores and into Paleto Bay, observing the occupants engaging in multiple cash hand-offs and evading ground units. Using thermal imaging, AIR-1 confirmed the vehicle's occupants were the sole users of a specific ATM in Paleto Bay during a critical time window. Subsequent ATM logs confirmed Robin Bank as the individual who accessed the machine during that period, leading to the charges of SF07 - Bank Robbery and VF01 - Evading an Officer.
      
      Casefile #218721
      
      
      He was pulled over by officers where Detective Wegman executed the Pending arrest and found Steriods, Meth, and Marijuiana in his bag.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Robin Bank
      Phone Number: 2508323
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • SF07 - Bank Robbery
      • DM03 - Possession of a Schedule III Controlled Substance
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A: N/A
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2 Witness Statement Detective Wegman

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 21/FEB/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Mick Wegman
    Date of Birth: 21/AUG/1993
    Phone Number: 2681
    Occupation: Police Detective II, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • On 21/FEB/2026 Bryan Trey requested a supervisor to his location over a incident that occurred at San Andreas Department of Corrections. My unit and Detective Xoza Shadow were the highest on shift where we then made our way down.
    
    I remembered that we were looking for Robin Bank in relation to an Arrest Warrant from a casefile where I then informed Detective Shadow. After Bryan informed that the individual refused to provide identification Shadow and my unit responded.
    
    At 16:49 I informed Shadow that the individual is listed as a Pending Arrest for charges where I responded code 2 from Zancudo Grande Valley.
    
    I arrived at the enterence to DOC where I awaited Detective Shadow to arrive, we then got confused whether it was already handled or not to which we went in assuming the arrest was not made for the case.
    
    Upon arrival we approached the individual approaching Robin where I ask him for his licenses, the individual gave me ID confirming the individual is Robin Bank. The name does match the Arrest Warrant where I then stepped aside with Robin gaining his side of the story, after getting his side I then approached Trey and got his side of the story.
    
    Through this we just talked about the situation, I then approached Shadow to talk where we agreed not to issue reckless and just proceed with the charges from the arrest report, I looked over the footage just to guage ensure it was not very reckless which the Bodycam showed it not being extreme.
    
    After that was determined I approached Mr. Banks and cuffed him then escorted him into the back of our cruiser and into the Department of Corrections. Prior to escort into the SADOC I informed Bank of the charges and then told him of the reason if his arrest within the Department of Corrections.
    
    After informing the suspect of the charges we moved into DOC and he was eventually frisked. After he was processed, I went back out to verify that Detective Shadow was safe after being told during the talk that there was an incident, I then searched the bag from Robin Bank locating 2x Meth, 1x Marijuana, 1x Steroids to which I then added another charge of the possession.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Mick Wegman, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Mick Wegman
    Police Detective II
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 01/JAN/2000

  

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

I, Hugh R. Allgood, Chief Public Defender of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Robin Bank, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and I will list my availability on the pending Scheduling Notice very soon.


Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 - [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Patrone and pertaining parties,
  
  Defense has filed their availability
  
  
  Chief Public Defender
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  235-6076 - [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 20:00 PM on 26th day of April, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #3 Detective Jaywood Witness statement

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 21/FEB/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Tom Jaywood
    Date of Birth: 25/JAN/1995
    Phone Number: 112-112
    Occupation: Detective I, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • On 19th DEC 2025 I was assigned to a casefile regarding a bank robbery at Legion Square involving the Mid Night Club affiliates. At the time of this incident, I held the rank of Police Officer II and was a member of the Detective Support Unit, assisting Detective Messiah Young.
    
    I was not present at the scene, as I was sleeping throughout this event. The reported incident began when suspects entered the bank with a hostage identified as Lily Owen, who was threatened with heavy weapons including carbine rifles. Following the robbery, the suspects fled the scene in multiple vehicles, leading to a pursuit that moved north. Lieutenant II Carl Jacobs was in AIR-1 and provided continuous aerial surveillance of a rainbow-colored La Coureuse registered to Robin Banks. Ground units lost visual contact due to severe weather at several points, but AIR-1 maintained eyes on the vehicle the entire time. During this tracking, the suspects were observed handing off cash to a citizen in Sandy Shores before continuing to Paleto Bay, as Officer David Loan arrived and held them at gunpoint before they evaded again.
    
    At approximately 01:34 AM, AIR-1 utilized thermal imaging to witness the two occupants of the La Coureuse interacting with a Paleto Bay ATM. Based on this narrative, the bodycam footage provided by Lieutenant II Carl Jacobs and Officer David Loan, and a Gang-Related Incident Report written by Officer Tyrone Turner, I finalized the initial casefile and compiled evidence to support a search warrant for the bank records. After Detective Young secured the warrant, as I did not have permissions to file one myself, I assisted in investigating the ATM logs. These logs positively identified Robin Banks as one of the individuals who accessed the ATM during the specified timeframe between 01:34 AM and 01:35 AM.
    
    I concluded the case by noting the appropriate charges for Evading an Officer and Bank Robbery, eventually moving the file toward archiving and a Pending Arrest.
    
    Detective II Mick Wegman pulled Robin Banks over on 21/FEB/2026 and executed the pending arrest, finding he was in possession of Steroids, Meth, and Marijuana.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Tom Jaywood, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Tom Jaywood
    Detective I
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 12/APR/2026

  
  
  Exhibit #4 Crime Report

  
  Exhibit #5 Incident Report

  
  Exhibit #6 Lieutenant Jacobs Bodycam

  ((Roleplay Proof))

  
  Exhibit #7 Officer Loan bodycam footage of the cash exchange

  

  ((Roleplay Proof))

  
  Exhibit #8 Detective Young's Discovery from the ATM Logs

  
  
  Rowin Lawson
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  451-9939 - [email protected]

---

• Prosecution,
  
  The Court, having reviewed the Motion for Discovery filed on April 26, 2026, directs the Prosecution to provide an explanation for the delay in the submission of the six identified items of evidence, designated as Exhibits 3 through 8.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  298-3863 - [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Patrone,
  
  Your honor, the delay in submission was due to oversight. I was under the impression that all the evidence had been submitted into discovery. upon further review I realized that there was a final correspondence with the arresting department that contained what I submitted in the final discovery submission. I apologize to the court for the delay in presenting the evidence.
  
  Rowin Lawson
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request a continuance in order to reschedule this trial.
  
  ((I have been fighting a cold; I would really appreciate if this can be done another day))

Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

To give both sides and the Court a fair amount of time to review the newly submitted evidence, the trial will be rescheduled to another date shortly. The Motion for Continuance is hereby granted.

(( Feel better soon! ))


So Ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

Respectfully I am no longer wanting to continue with this case, I just find it rediculous the amount of pushing for the time and the amount of MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE that are being accepted, this case comes back to an incident on the 19th of december 2025 then took the department untill the 21st of february 2026 to made the arrest where the case officially hit the court.
On the 21st of february the NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY giving 30 days to post the discovery and evidence.
On the 25th of march the prosecution posts MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, more then 30 days later the prosecution was not even able to provide evidence and response yet it is charges that resulted from an already investigated matter.
03rd of april after more then a week which is the time granted an arrested report came out.
then a day before the trial which was planned on the 26th of april 23 days after the evidence posted the prosecution decided to post another wave of evidence and another MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE which gets accepted.

The constitution states " 6th Amendment
In all criminal trials brought forth by or too the San Andreas Judicial Branch, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial"

It is sad to see a judge is accomplice to breach of the constitution and allowing the prosecution for more then reasonable time. If the states is failing to provide prosecution and they lack of staff, probably it is better to reconsider the whole system.

I would like to thank Hugh Allgood for his professionalism and taking the case.

GGs

---

---

The disputed charge(s) will remain the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.

Respectfully,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]