Page 1 of 1
#26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 04 Feb 2026, 16:39
by Levy Gold
Defendant Name: Matei Knight
Defendant Phone: 465-1214
(( Defendant Discord: matei9695 ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney
Charging Department: Police Department
Date & Time of Incident(s): 02/FEB/2026
Charge(s):
- WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
- WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
- GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
Narrative:
My client believes they were wrongly charged and that their rights were violated
I,
Levy Gold, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))

Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 06 Feb 2026, 02:42
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 6th day of February, 2026.
The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availablity. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.
Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Respectfully,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 06 Feb 2026, 02:43
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 6th day of February, 2026.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availablity. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.
The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue
Respectfully,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 08 Mar 2026, 04:20
by Rowin Lawson

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 8th day of March, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request a continuance on this case. I would like to request one more week to collect and organize evidence for this case. Due to the volume of cases I am handling at the moment I would request that the court allow some additional time to prepare.
Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected] 
Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 08 Mar 2026, 18:17
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
A decision was reached in the above case on the 8th day of March, 2026.
The Court will accept the Motion for Continuance, given the stated case load and the short timeframe requested.
A continuance for one week is hereby granted.
So Ordered,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 17 Mar 2026, 00:26
by Rowin Lawson

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 17th day of March, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: If the court would allow one more week, The prosecution is unfortunately still waiting on evidence for this case. If I receive it prior to the week continuance expiring, I will present it early to the court.
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected] 
Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 18 Mar 2026, 00:10
by Mic Ross
- - - - -
Blaise & Scott
5. Del Perro Blvd
"YOUR CASE, OUR COMMITMENT"
- A Notice of Counsel was filed in the above-referenced matter on the 17th of March, 2026.
I, Mic Ross, a private defense attorney with Blaise & Scott, will be representing the defendant(s), Matei Knight, in this case.
I will be acting as Primary Counsel and will await further direction from the Presiding Judge.
The reason for this change in council is due to the sexual cocktail that Levy Gold has received from multiple Kenyan "Escorts (Full service)"
Currently he is flying back to the Fatherland known as Israel. Hopefully they can treat the new type of hepatitis he has been given from the worker we believe to be called "Shaniqua Babatunde". We wish him well and hope that he does not need a transplant as I don't think he would want to go through "Brit Milah" again, especially when he is now matured and not when he is 8 days old.

Mic Ross - Junior Attorney
Your Case. Our Commitment.
- - - - -
Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 25 Mar 2026, 05:04
by Rowin Lawson

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice was filed in the above case on the 25th day of March, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: Upon review of the Discovery and conversations with the arresting department, The Prosecution would like to drop charges.
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected] 
Re: #26-BT-0016 State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
Posted: 25 Mar 2026, 22:23
by Adam Patrone

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight
#26-BT-0016
A decision was reached in the above case on the 25th day of March, 2026.
The disputed charge(s) of WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm, WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications and GM14 - Obstruction of Justice will be removed from the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.
The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $35,500 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.
Respectfully,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
