Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Waldo Marshall
Defendant Phone: 493-3725
(( Defendant Discord: billybluewater))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney - Rockford Law

Charging Department: Sheriff's Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 10/JAN/2026 21:46
Charge(s):

• Trespassing

Narrative:
My client believes they are not guilty of the charges given.

---

I, Audrey Hartwell, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availablity. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Waldo Marshall is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availablity. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibiy #1 Arrest report LSSD

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Waldo Marshall
    Telephone Number: 4933725
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • NM06 - Trespassing
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: Frank Peters
    Badge Number: 26627
    Callsign: 111TS

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2026-01-10
    Deputies Involved: Fillmoore Grayson, Leif Helgarson, Martin Haswell, Will Grigg, Mason Ross
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • There was an active hostage situation at city hall involving multiple VIP's. While this situation was going on there was a murmured voice coming from the vents feeding the hostage takers information. Because of this I went to the roof of city hall using the ladder and found waldo marshal on the roof calming to be asleep. We could not link the fact that he was the one supplying information to the hostage taker because of the amount of vents at city hall. But he was charged with trespassing, although he was not in the gated helipad of city hall just at the top of the ladder by the vent. He was then taken to MRPD and requested a supervisor who where all 10-9 in the hostage situation. Fillmoore Grayson said there is no supervisor avaliable and to process him, I provided Waldo Marshall with my badge number and Fillmoore Grayson's.

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: N/A

  
  
  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  
  

  ---

  

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

On behalf of,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 227-6646 — [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 227-6646 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is a notice that I will be taking over this court case preceding from here on out. A new scheduling motion will be sent out within the next day.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
495-1265 — [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 05:30 PM on 26th day of April, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

---

---

---

---

• The defendant was found after units went up a ladder at the back of City Hall following reports of an individual providing information through the ventilation.

---

---

The prosecution argues that the defendant was somewhere he was not supposed to be, that individuals are not allowed onto the roof of City Hall or up the ladder at the back, and that this is common knowledge.

The defense argues that the individual accessed a publicly accessible ladder where there is no signage surrounding the area. They state there was no evidence of criminal intent or involvement in criminal activity.

---

---

The Court finds that the defendant did make their way onto the roof of City Hall. As presented in the exhibit, the defendant did not pass through the locked gate but remained in an accessible area of City Hall.

The Court notes the distinct lack of signage presented today. Trespass, as a law in our state, requires that there be notice to the individual. This can be done via signage, verbally by law enforcement or a licensed manager, or through written documentation accepted by the courts, known as a Written Notice of Trespass.

With the lack of notice to the defendant, either by signage or verbally by officers on scene, as well as no record of the defendant using this access to further criminal activities, the Court cannot determine whether this was done with malicious intent or with the knowledge that the defendant was not allowed to access the area.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of NM06 - Trespassing, I find the defendant, Waldo Marshall, not guilty.

The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted, as well as the payment of $4,500 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses or inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

So Ordered,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]