Page 1 of 1
#25-BT-0132 State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 10:23
by Blaze Seaborn
Defendant Name: Blaze King
Defendant Phone: 581-3925
(( Defendant Discord: Blazendary3 ))
(( Defendant Timezone: PST ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney
Charging Department: LSPD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 01/12/2025 02:42:13
Charge(s):
- GF02 Robbery
- SF02 Attempted Murder of a Goverment Employee
- VF01 Evading an Officer
- GM05 Receiving Stolen Property
- GM08 Vandalism
- GM13 Criminal Threats of a Goverment Employee
- WM01 Unlawful Brandishing of a Firearm or Weapon
- WM02 Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
Narrative:
I was wrongfully charged and pursued for said charges.
I,
Blaze King, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))

Re: State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 08:55
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 2nd day of December, 2025.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]
Re: State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 08:59
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
#25-BT-0132
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 2nd day of December, 2025.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Blaze King is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0132 State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 19:10
by Michael Blaise

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 2nd of December, 2025.
I, Michael Blaise, a Private Defense Attorney, will be representing the Defendant, Blaze King.
I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Defense Attorney
552-8150 — [email protected] 
Re: #25-BT-0132 State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 20 Dec 2025, 21:06
by Terence Williams

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
#25-BT-0132
A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice was filed in the above case on the 20th of December, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: Dropping charges
- Detailed Explanation: Following a review of evidence, and as agreed by the arresting department, the Prosecution has decided to dismiss all charges against the defendant. To note, the defendant has already received reimbursement for a majority of the charges, with a receipt forwarded privately to the presiding judge.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

Re: #25-BT-0132 State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 21 Dec 2025, 04:57
by Michael Blaise
Re: #25-BT-0132 State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
Posted: 21 Dec 2025, 18:26
by Joseph Horton

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Blaze King
#25-BT-0132
A decision was reached in the above case on the 21st day of December, 2025.
The disputed charges will be removed from the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.
The Court notes the confirmation from the Prosecution that the Defendant has already been compensated for all other charges, so the Court will not be handling these matters.
The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $22,000 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.
Respectfully,

Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected] 