Page 1 of 2
#25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 14 Sep 2025, 00:23
by Marc Ericsson
Defendant Name: Marc Ericsson
Defendant Phone: 283-7753
(( Defendant Discord: whoischilo ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC-4 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation / Private Defense Attorney
Charging Department: LSSD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 07/09/2025 15:20
Charge(s):
- VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle (Misdemeanor $3000)
Narrative:
I do not agree with this charge.
I,
Marc Ericsson, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))
Re: State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 07:21
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 16th day of September, 2025.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]
Re: State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 07:22
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 16th day of September, 2025.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Oct 2025, 12:47
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 16th of Octoberl, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
ARREST REPORT
MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
Full Name: Marc Ericsson
Telephone Number: REDACTED
Licenses Suspended: Yes
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
VEHICLES INVOLVED
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Zoe Virue
Badge Number: 29314
Callsign: 1-C-14
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2025-09-07
Deputies Involved: Zoe Virtue_Dante archer
Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
- -Suspect by the name of Marc Ericsson was driving he's vehicle down from upper pillbox at around 233 km an hour in a 80 zone and was registered on the radar he's speed i then turn around with lights and sirens and on and attempted to pull over the suspect who then turn to the side of the road i then conducted the 10-55 on the suspect where he was given reckless operations due to the extreme high speed in a 80 zone he was driving.
-Suspect was then told to step out of the vehicle wish the suspect did and was then place in handcuffed told he's rights search and id as Marc Ericsson then taken into the back of my police cruiser before being transported to mission raw to serve he's time.
-Vehicle was impounded by Dante archer.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: N/A
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
Zoe Virtue
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 —
[email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Oct 2025, 20:28
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Motion for Summary Judgment was filed in the above case on the 16th of October, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Summary Judgment, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;
- Reasoning: Guilt beyond reasonable doubt
- Detailed Explanation: The discovery provided by the Prosecution against the defendant, Marc Ericsson, includes an arrest report for the incident in which the details are, that the defendant was witnessed by the arresting deputy from the Sheriff's Department as speeding excessively, clocked on the deputy's radar as being 233kmph while driving in an 80 zone; this is 153kmph over the regular speed limit of 80kmph, and 73kmph over the upper limit of 160kmph to be valid for VC03 - Speeding 3rd Degree. Case precedent continuously ruled upon in both the Superior Court and Court of Appeals, including but not limited to #23-CM-0086, State of San Andreas v. Bongo Haze and #25-AP-0001, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez, where it was ruled that the difference between a citation for speeding of the 3rd degree and a misdemeanour charge for reckless operation was up to the individual law enforcement officer and, ultimately, at their discretion. The court cannot deny this precedent, first established in the Superior Court and then upheld in the Court of Appeals; eye-witness testimony in the shape of an arrest report state that the defendant as clocked on a speed radard by a deputy, driving at nearly three (3) times the legal speed limit. The discretionary speeding citation is out of bounds, and the deputy was well within their legal right to charge the defendant as they did, and this court should do everything to uphold the charge as is.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Oct 2025, 21:11
by Marc Ericsson
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Motion to Compel Discovery was filed in the above case on the 16 of September, 2025.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;
- Requested Discovery: Original, unaltered, and time-stamped Arrest Report submitted by the arresting officer, for the arrest on September 7, 2025, as submitted to the San Andreas Sheriff’s Department arrest report collection.
- Detailed Reasoning:
The prosecution has provided an arrest report containing several redactions and incomplete metadata. The report does not have the original submission timestamp, metadata, and digital filing details typically associated with standard SD reports. I.e the stamp that states, John Doe wrote: ↑ Day Month Date, Year Time.
The Defendant has reason to believe that the arrest report was not filed on the same day as the date of arrest but was instead created or modified several days later to be more specific, an entire week after the arrest date. This raises a material question regarding the accuracy, authenticity, and potential alteration of factual details included in the current version of the report. We see no reason why information from the arrest report needs to be redacted, as the information is already public in many places.
Again, the Defendant seeks production of the original, unedited report as first submitted by the arresting deputy, including the file’s creation and submission timestamps and author metadata.
Marc Ericsson
Defendant, Pro Se
Licensed Attorney
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Oct 2025, 21:24
by Marc Ericsson
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
OBJECTION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
- The Defense does not agree with the motion, nor does it concede to the factual basis presented by the Prosecution.
The Defendant expressly disputes the facts as stated within the arrest report, including the alleged speed, the circumstances of the stop, and the accuracy of the report’s contents. There are clear factual disputes that must be examined and proven through proper evidentiary procedure at trial.
As such, this matter is not suitable for summary judgment, as issues of material fact remain in dispute. As the courts know, summary judgments require that there be no dispute about the facts of the case, and only a determination about how the situation applies to the law will be made. As established, the defense is disputing the facts of the arrest report. The Defense therefore requests that the Court deny the State’s Motion for Summary Judgment and proceed to a full bench trial where all evidence and testimony can be presented and properly evaluated.
Should the Court review the existing motions within the next few days, the Defense respectfully requests that a trial date be set for this coming weekend so there is no further delays.
Marc Ericsson
Defendant, Pro Se
Licensed Attorney
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Oct 2025, 22:12
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A decision was reached in the above case on the 16th day of October, 2025.
The court has looked over the submissions from both the prosecution and defense. Given the defense counsels objection to the Motion for Summary Judgement, the court will be denying the prosecutions motion. Summary Judgements by definition, as the defense correctly stated, require that there be no dispute about the facts of the case, and only a determination about how the situation applies to the law will be made. As the defense has expressed and shown a possibility that the facts could be in dispute, the court must allow them a chance to accurately defend in court.
In regards to the defenses Motion to Compel Discovery, the court will be ordering the prosecution to provide a quoted version of the arrest report to be submitted on the docket. In addition to that, we will be requesting the answer to the follow question: Could you please explain why the vehicle information has been redacted?
You have 7 days to comply with the above order.
Respectfully,
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 21 Oct 2025, 22:48
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Motion to Stay Pending Appeal was filed in the above case on the 21st of October, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;
- Reasoning: The State of San Andreas in this case has initiated an appeal within the San Andreas Court of Appeals following the latest Court Decision.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 16 Nov 2025, 00:11
by Jaz Owens
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 15th of November, 2025.
I, Jaz Owens, Acting Chief Public Defender with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Marc Ericsson in the underlying case.
I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.
Acting Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
📞429-1517 — 📧 [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 17 Nov 2025, 00:10
by Jaz Owens
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 17 Nov 2025, 00:13
by Jaz Owens
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
WITNESS LIST
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Witness List was filed in the above case on the 17th of November, 2025.
- The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Witness List, designating the following list of individuals as witnesses, who may be called to the stand.
Name of Witness:
Marc Ericsson
Type of Witness: (eye, fact, expert, or other type of witness)
Eye Witness, Defendant in the case.
Relevance to the case:
Marc Ericsson is the defendant in this case and has agreed to undergo witness examination under oath.
Acting Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
📞429-1517 — 📧 [email protected][/list]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 17 Nov 2025, 22:58
by Jaz Owens
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 18 Nov 2025, 00:18
by Hope Kant
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 18 Nov 2025, 00:55
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF TRIAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-CM-0121
A trial date was set on the above case on 18 of November, 2025.
In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling/time-slot application, this trial shall take place at 7:00 PM on 23rd of November, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.
Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.
So ordered,
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 19 Nov 2025, 19:30
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 19th of November, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
zoe Virtue wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025, 20:18
ARREST REPORT
MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
Full Name: Marc Ericsson
Telephone Number: 2837753
Licenses Suspended: Yes
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
VEHICLES INVOLVED
- Vehicle A: White Nobie LP N/A VIN N/A Ro Marc Ericsson
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Zoe Virue
Badge Number: 29314
Callsign: 1-C-14
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2025-09-15
Deputies Involved: Zoe Virtue_Dante archer
Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
- -Suspect by the name of Marc Ericsson was driving he's vehicle down from upper pillbox at around 233 km an hour in a 80 zone and was registered on the radar he's speed i then turn around with lights and sirens and on and attempted to pull over the suspect who then turn to the side of the road i then conducted the 10-55 on the suspect where he was given reckless operations due to the extreme high speed in a 80 zone he was driving.
-Suspect was then told to step out of the vehicle wish the suspect did and was then place in handcuffed told he's rights search and id as Marc Ericsson then taken into the back of my police cruiser before being transported to mission raw to serve he's time.
-Vehicle was impounded by Dante archer.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: N/A
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
Zoe Virtue
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 —
[email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 22 Nov 2025, 21:06
by Hope Kant
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 23 Nov 2025, 20:02
by Terence Williams
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 23 Nov 2025, 20:11
by Jaz Owens
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 25 Nov 2025, 03:45
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF TRIAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A trial date was set on the above case on the 24th day of November, 2025.
In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling/time-slot application, this trial shall take place at 8:30 PM on 28th of November, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.
Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.
So ordered,
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 28 Nov 2025, 18:39
by Jaz Owens
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 02:28
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF SCHEDULING
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 5th of December, 2025.
All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.
In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.
In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.
If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.
Respectfully,
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 09 Dec 2025, 01:01
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF TRIAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
#25-BT-0121
A trial date was set on the above case on the 8th day of December, 2025.
In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling/time-slot application, this trial shall take place at 2:00 PM on 14th of December, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.
Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.
So ordered,
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 09 Dec 2025, 12:28
by Terence Williams
Re: #25-BT-0121 State of San Andreas v. Marc Ericsson
Posted: 09 Dec 2025, 14:11
by Jaz Owens
