Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Matei Knight
Defendant Phone: 465-1214
(( Defendant Discord: matei9695))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC +1))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 13/SEP/2025 01:30
Charge(s):

• Accessory to SF02 - Murder of a Gov. Employee
• DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance

Narrative:
Myself and my brother Ronaldo Knight were jogging around an area that was surrounded by SWAT officers. Both of us were unarmed and had no illegal items on us. Once we were detained we heard that our family members were being gunned down by PD. We complied the whole time and even put the clothes that we had on us back on, for proof to be sent to the officers who were shot at. From our understanding we were NOT identified as shooting at or being at the scene. Despite that, Samuel Martin still decided to stack us with some petty charges, for some things we DID NOT DO.

---

I, Matei Knight, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Matei Knight is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

I, Otis Milton, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant(s), Matei Knight in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
306-8659 — [email protected]

---

---

I, Luna McMillan, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant(s), Matei Knight in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Jr Prosecution Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 463-9315 — [email protected][/list]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Matei Knight, 13/SEP/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Laurant Conrad
      Callsign: 21-S-10
      
      Date of Arrest: 13/SEP/2025
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Sergeant I Laurant Conrad
      • Police Captain III Samuel Martin
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      Sgt Conrad responded to a swat operation where a large scale operation was taking place on Cayo Perico. Air -1 called out two suspects leaving the drug manufacturing compound identified as Mateo and Ronaldo Knight. Sgt. Conrad placed both in cuffs and read them their rights before detaining them in a vehicle. Per an investigation by Captaain Martin and GND both Ronaldo and Matei were charged with Accessory to SF02 of gov and DF05 and taken to DOC.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Ronaldo Knight
      Phone Number: REDACTED
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • Accessory to SF02 - Murder of a Gov. Employee
      • DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #2 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Matei Knight
      Phone Number: REDACTED
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • Accessory to SF02 - Murder of a Gov. Employee
      • DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Captain Samuel Martin

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: [01/JAN/2000]

  Witness Information

  • Name: Samuel Martin
    Date of Birth: REDACTED
    Phone Number: REDACTED
    Occupation: Police Officer

  Witness Statement

  • Detectives gained intel on a gang manufacturing narcotics at a location. Before we moved in the whole island was scanned with thermals, the only people on the island at the time was the suspects inside the lab. Gunship then also came the thermals and covered the area, noone was called out to be in the area by gunship other than the suspects inside the lab.
    
    The suspects were spotted by officers and air 1 with thermals running from the camp where they had just shot officers. From my knowledge the suspects got naked but kept their clothes on them (this can be seen in the arrest reports) from what I could tell the clothing matched the suspects inside the lab. Both suspects ditched their weapons and they were unable to be found.
    
    Matei had a crate full of drag materials inside the lab which can be seen here
    
    

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Samuel Martin, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Samuel Martin
    Police Captain III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 12/OCT/2025

  

• Exhibit #3: Physical evidence - Drug paraphernalia

  
  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD AND FINAL notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

---

Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be accepting the plea of guilty from the defendant. The defendant was given ample time to interact with the courts and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As little to no contact has been made with the courts in the past 3-4 weeks, this case will now be archived and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.

Respectfully,


Superior Court Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]