Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Rustin Peace
Defendant Phone: 2186386
(( Defendant Discord: HERE ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC+2 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 09/AUG/2025
Charge(s):

• VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle

Narrative:

I was speeding yes, I was however in total control of the vehicle and I had no intension to disregard for life and/or property, I even slowed down and turned in the intersection showing that I was actually controlling the vehicle.

---

I, Rustin Peace, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Rustin Peace is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Rustin Peace, 08/AUG/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Aiden Beta
      Callsign: 21-S-30
      
      Date of Arrest: 08/AUG/2025
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Sergeant II Aiden Beta
      • Police Officer I David Loan
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      Aiden clocked Rustin at 186 inside the city, clearly reckless. Aiden pulled her over and arrested her for the speed. Rustin was very resistive in the process of being taken into the cruiser, so Aiden needed David Loan's help to get her into the back since she just went limp. Aiden transported her to Mission Row. Rustin also had a gram of marijuana on her. While in the cell Rustin attacked Aiden and punched him.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Rustin Peace
      Phone Number: -REDACTED-
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
      • GM02 - Battery
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2: Impound report - Cypher, 08/AUG/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department IMPOUND REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  ---

  • VEHICLE DETAILS
    • Vehicle Owner: Rustin Peace
      Phone Number: -REDACTED-
      License Plate: H8OP4OO1
      Vehicle Identification Number (VIN): H5WDDHCA2D6SDA000
      Vehicle Model: Cypher
      Vehicle Color: Grey/Red
      Miscelleanous Details:
    
    IMPOUND DETAILS
    • Date and Time: 08/AUG/2025 22:38
      Location: San Andreas Ave
      Brief Statement of Impounding Reason: Suspect was being arrested by Aiden Beta and asked us to impound the vehicle.
      Officers Involved: Police Sergeant II Aiden Beta, Police Officer I David Loan, Police Cadet Carl Thisthon
      Documented Evidence:

  
  

  ---

  

• Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Police Sergeant Aiden Beta

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 09/AUG/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Aiden Beta
    Date of Birth: 01/DEC/2000
    Phone Number: 5188103
    Occupation: Police Sergeant II, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • The situation started with me clocking Rustin driving her Cypher at 186 on San Andreas Ave next to Red Parking garage. I pulled out of my speed trap code 3 and saw her making a left northbound turn onto Alta street from San Andreas ave, before making another quick left westbound to go back onto San andreas, before making another u turn to go back the same way she was heading originally eastbound on San Andreas Ave. I believe this was a shortlived attempt at me losing visual of her, but I did not pursue this in my 10-55. Regardless, I clocked her at 186 which is reckless in an 80 zone and arrested her for that. Rustin decided to go went limp during the entire arrest so I carried her into the cruiser and drove her to Mission Row. Once at Mission Row she resisted so I tazed her and carried her into the cell. Once in the cell and uncuffed, she punched me in the back of the head, so I charged her with Battery and started her time. I did not add the GOV modifier on the battery charge since that would mean I have to take her to DOC, and I did not have the time for that. ((Bodycam RP: https://i.gyazo.com/8c36013106b39e614f3 ... d7611b.png ))

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Aiden Beta, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Aiden Beta
    Police Sergeant II
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 18/AUG/2025

  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Rustin Peace, 08/AUG/2025
  Requested Evidence to Suppress:
  Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Rustin Peace, 08/AUG/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Aiden Beta
      Callsign: 21-S-30
      
      Date of Arrest: 08/AUG/2025
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Sergeant II Aiden Beta
      • Police Officer I David Loan
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      Aiden clocked Rustin at 186 inside the city, clearly reckless. Aiden pulled her over and arrested her for the speed. Rustin was very resistive in the process of being taken into the cruiser, so Aiden needed David Loan's help to get her into the back since she just went limp. Aiden transported her to Mission Row. Rustin also had a gram of marijuana on her. While in the cell Rustin attacked Aiden and punched him.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Rustin Peace
      Phone Number: -REDACTED-
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
      • GM02 - Battery
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      
  • Detailed Reasoning: The section highlighted in Yellow:lack of foundation and Facts Not in Evidence: The statement that I was ‘clocked at 186’ is unsupported by any radar, dashcam, or bodycam evidence. Without objective corroboration, the officer’s statement is speculative and prejudicial, and should be suppressed.
    The section highlighted in Red: speculation/improper opinion testimony: The officer’s assertion that Defendant’s driving was ‘clearly reckless’ is improper opinion testimony. It speculates as to Defendant’s mental state and intentions, which the officer cannot know or testify to. Intentional disregard is an essential element of the charge and is reserved for determination by the court or jury based on admissible evidence. This language is therefore speculative, conclusory, and unduly prejudicial, and should be suppressed.
    The section highlighted in Green: false reporting or perjury: The assertion that Defendant ‘punched’ Officer Aiden is factually inaccurate. There is no corroborating evidence such as video, medical reports, or independent witnesses to support this claim. The mischaracterization of events is prejudicial, undermines due process, and should be suppressed. This is simply never happened.

• Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Police Sergeant Aiden Beta
  Requested Evidence to Suppress:
  Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Police Sergeant Aiden Beta

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 09/AUG/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Aiden Beta
    Date of Birth: 01/DEC/2000
    Phone Number: 5188103
    Occupation: Police Sergeant II, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • The situation started with me clocking Rustin driving her Cypher at 186 on San Andreas Ave next to Red Parking garage. I pulled out of my speed trap code 3 and saw her making a left northbound turn onto Alta street from San Andreas ave, before making another quick left westbound to go back onto San andreas, before making another u turn to go back the same way she was heading originally eastbound on San Andreas Ave. I believe this was a shortlived attempt at me losing visual of her, but I did not pursue this in my 10-55. Regardless, I clocked her at 186 which is reckless in an 80 zone and arrested her for that. Rustin decided to go limp during the entire arrest so I carried her into the cruiser and drove her to Mission Row. Once at Mission Row she resisted so I tazed her and carried her into the cell. Once in the cell and uncuffed, she punched me in the back of the head, so I charged her with Battery and started her time. I did not add the GOV modifier on the battery charge since that would mean I have to take her to DOC, and I did not have the time for that. ((Bodycam RP: https://i.gyazo.com/8c36013106b39e614f3 ... d7611b.png ))

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Aiden Beta, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Aiden Beta
    Police Sergeant II
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 18/AUG/2025

  
  • Detailed Reasoning: The section highlighted in Yellow:lack of foundation and Facts Not in Evidence: The statement that I was ‘clocked at 186’ is unsupported by any radar, dashcam, or bodycam evidence. Without objective corroboration, the officer’s statement is speculative and prejudicial, and should be suppressed.
    The section highlighted in Red: Speculation improper opinion; assumes intent: The statement that I made ‘a short-lived attempt at losing visual’ is speculation about my intent. The officer cannot know my intentions, and such assumptions are improper and prejudicial. This statement should be suppressed
    The section highlighted in Orange: Speculation: The statement that I ‘decided to go limp’ is speculative and misleading. In reality, I was pushed by the officer, which caused me to fall and sustain injuries. The officer cannot assume intent behind my physical condition, and this statement should be suppressed.
    The section highlighted in Blue: Conclusory and vague: The statement that I ‘resisted’ is vague and conclusory. The officer provides no factual description of any alleged resistance. Without specific facts, matter of fact, the term is prejudicial and should be suppressed.
    The section highlighted in Green: Factually inaccurate: The statement that I ‘punched the officer in the back of the head’ is factually inaccurate and unsupported by any evidence. There is no video, witness, or medical documentation to corroborate this claim It actually never happened, I never punched the officer. The statement is false and prejudicial, and should be suppressed.

Rustin Peace
CEO
Deep Services
— [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  The Court acknowledges the Motion to Suppress submitted by the Defendant. The Court will hear the Motion and any objections in the pre-trial conference that takes place 15 minutes before trial.
  
  Defense, please schedule the trial at your earliest convenience, as per the last docket notice from the Court.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #4: Bodycam footage - Police Sergeant Aiden Beta, 08/AUG/2025

  * You would see the events unfold as Aiden described in his witness statement
  ((Proof of RP))

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling/time-slot application, this trial shall take place at 03:00 PM on 21st day of September, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,



Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

---

---

Before moving into the contested charges, the Court will address a statement made by the Defendant during their closing remarks. The Court, on the 9th day of September, 2025, informed the Parties that the Motion to Supress was submitted by the Defendant and will be heard during the pre-trial conference. The Defendant states that they were tricked by the Court, as they wished to additionally contest the Battery charge that took place on that day, also.

The Court affirms that the procedure to modify contested charges was not followed by the Defense, as they requested the charges be amended the day of court. The Court cannot allow additional charges to be considered at the last minute, as this would prevent any fair opportunity to the Prosecution to prepare an adequate case.

Moving on, the Court has reviewed the facts of the case surrounding the arrest that took place on the 8th of August, 2025.

The Defendant was stopped by Sergeant Beta of the Los Santos Police Department following a routine speed trap being performed by the Officer. The Officer states in the arrest report that they clocked the Defendant driving at 186 km/h within the City.

During the trial, the Defendant admitted several times to the fact that they were speeding within the City, stating in their defense that they had full control of the vehicle and had no intent to cause harm.

The Court references #25-AP-0001, State of San Andreas v. Roberto Sanchez, along with #23-CM-0086, State of San Andreas v. Bongo Haze, which affirms that Officer discretion plays a part in placing a Reckless Operation charge over any Vehicular Citations in the case. The Court cannot find that a reasonable person, operating at over twice the speed limit, within the city, can do so accidentally. To wit, any vehicle partaking in such rates of speed can only be determined by the court as intentional actions that disregard the life and/or property of others on the roadway, as well as pedestrians.

The Court also notes the actions of the Defendant throughout the trial, showing continued levels of disrespect and defiance to Court Orders. As such, the Court will be applying GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court for the defendant's disregard of court orders to move on from an objection that had previously been ruled upon, backhanded comments, and general disruptions.

Another individual who showed similar behaviour, Ms. Dustin Peace, will also be receiving GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court, as well as for purposely attempting to deceive the Court during the issuance of the Verdict by switching places and attempting to impersonate the Defendant by wearing identical clothing, and maintaining the charade even after being warned by the Court.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle, I find the defendant, Rustin Peace, guilty.
• On the count of GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court, I find the defendant, Rustin Peace, guilty.

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]