Page 1 of 1
#26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 19 Apr 2025, 17:41
by Lilliana Howell
Defendant Name: Lilliana Howell
Defendant Phone: 4857557
(( Defendant Discord: .Kempi ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC+1 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Charging Department: LSPD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 19/APR/2025 01:00
Charge(s):
- WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
- WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
Narrative:
I do not believe that stopping next to a police scene to avoid running over a homeless man the police failed to contain on their scene constitutes reasonable suspicion for them to conduct a traffic stop for the sole purpose of calling K9 for an open-air sniff to create PC to search my vehicle.
As such, I do not believe the search was justified, and all illegal items found during the search should be stricken as fruits of the poisonous tree.
I,
Lilliana Howell, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))
Re: State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 06:33
by Sayaka Yukimura
Re: #25-BT-0090 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 06:34
by Sayaka Yukimura
Re: #25-BT-0090 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 09:24
by Lilliana Howell
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lilliana Howell
#25-BT-0090
A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 29th of April, 2025.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Requested Venue: Normal Trial
- Detailed Explanation: I believe that the outcome of the trial should be able to set precedent on when Law Enforcement is allowed to detain individuals to conduct open-air Sniffs with K9.
Lilliana Howell
N/A
[email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0090 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 10 May 2025, 03:49
by Sayaka Yukimura
Re: State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 13:44
by Lilliana Howell
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lilliana Howell
#N/A
A Motion for Involuntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 24th of February, 2026.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: SAJB Infringing on my 6th Amendment rights to a Speedy Trial
- Detailed Explanation: The courts have breached their own policy of "First Come, First Served" by cherry-picking a case to activate, which was filed 10 (ten) months after this one, see #26-CM-0003 State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks. As such, the courts are denying my rights to a speedy trial and breaching their own "First-come, first-served" protocol by favoring a defendant over others. As such, the defense believes that this case and any Formal Criminal Trial cases filed prior to "#26-CM-0003 State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks" should be dismissed with prejudice to uphold our rights to a speedy trial.
The courts should not be cherry-picking which defendants have to wait 1 month for activation, while others wait for nearly a year to be seen.
Lilliana Howell
Self-Representing
Re: State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 03:54
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
A decision was reached in the above case on the 25th day of February, 2026.
The Court will be rejecting the Motion for Involuntary Dismissal.
It should be noted to all that Formal Criminal Trials are usually conducted on a first-come, first-served basis; however, there are circumstances in which the Court will immediately activate a Formal Criminal Trial following a Motion for a Change of Venue. Notably, where Discovery has already been submitted to the Docket, the Court will usually keep the case active.
In the case of 26-CM-0003 State of San Andreas v. Deandre Stacks, this was the justification for the case being activated. We would also like to note the second part of the statement, "Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances". The Deandre Stacks case qualified as a special circumstance.
So Ordered,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 02 Mar 2026, 17:58
by Audrey Hartwell
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
Re: State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 2nd of March, 2026.
I, Audrey Hartwell, a Private Defense Attorney with Rockford Law, will be representing the Defendant(s), Name in the underlying case.
I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel/Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.
Managing Partner
Rockford Law
377-1669 — [email protected]
Re: State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 05 Mar 2026, 23:36
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 5th of March, 2026.
The case of the State of San Andreas v. Defendant is hereby activated by this Court under #26-CM-0006 as a Formal Criminal Trial.
At this time the Defendant has adequate representation, however, a State Prosecutor has not been assigned to this case. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned and they inform the court they are ready to proceed.
In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.
Respectfully,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 16 Mar 2026, 02:08
by Rowin Lawson
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 16th day of March, 2026.
I, Rowin Lawson, a Prosecutor of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.
I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 20 Mar 2026, 22:20
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
An Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 20th day of March, 2026.
The prosecution is hereby ordered to submit the majority of their evidence, including all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within fourteen (14) days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.
Additionally, the defense is also hereby ordered to provide all evidence intended for trial via a Motion for Discovery. Any remaining evidence or supplemental submissions by either party must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the scheduled Motions hearing.
Both parties are also ordered to provide an initial witness list to the Court. Any required amendments to the witness list shall be filed through a separate motion ahead of the Motions hearing.
Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket, parties can begin filing motions they intend to be heard at the Motions hearing. Parties should not be filing objections or rebuttals to Motions as this will be addressed during the Motions hearing.
All submissions to the docket must be filed filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the scheduled Motions hearing.
So ordered,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 02 Apr 2026, 05:44
by Rowin Lawson
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lilliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 1st of April, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
ARREST REPORT
MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
Full Name: Lilliana Howell
Telephone Number: 4857557
Licenses Suspended: Yes
Charges:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- VF02 - Felony Hit and Run of a Gov. employee
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Klaus Forbes
Badge Number: 29566
Callsign: 12-S-37
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2025-01-17
Deputies Involved: Isaac Khalifa , Jason Holt , Ava Behr , Matthew Handley , Clay Thompson
Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
- I, Klaus Forbes, responded to a call from DOC about a potential kidnapping being conducted by Ivy Hirano. Upon my arrival with Deputy Jason Holt, we encountered 2 females wearing masks in a Elegy Retro DOC informed us that they were joking around with them as the two were friends. Holt conducted an investigation of Ivy Hirano for driving without a valid ID and was placing her into custody Upon his investigation, he began pick locking the vehicle that was used in the crime belonging to Lilliana and searched it to be ready to be impounded. Lilianna decided to hop in the vehicle that was used in the crime and begin driving away Upon efforts of deputies trying to stop her, she swerved and completely smashed into one of our deputies on foot Upon Holts search, he found 2 legal firearms belonging to Lilianna, and we suspended her license as she committed a felony
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: N/A
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
Klaus Forbes
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Case Number: [Case Number]
Incident Date: [01/JAN/2025]
Witness Information
- Name: Matthew Handley
Date of Birth: 10/oct/1990
Phone Number:
Occupation: investigator sheriffs officers
Witness Statement
- A department radio call came over from DOC that someone was in a trunk of a vehicle and it was a possible kidnap attempt.
I arrived on scene and was the fourth unit a deputy. I think it was Jason. Holt confirmed that the incident was a prank done by Ivy hirano and one other.
Doing my due diligence, I noticed that Ivy Hirano had a suspended license less than 24 hours ago and I made the initial deputies aware.
At this stage, Jason Holt came over to Ivy and requested her ID which she refused a total of about six times. She was then forcibly detained with a taser and her ID taken. It became apparnt that she indeed did have a suspended license.
Deputy Holt then reviewed the body Cam from the DC officer which confirmed Ivy was driving the vehicle with 1 other in the trunk ( may have been Lillian I cannot confirm) Ivy was then search and arrested and stolen numberplates discovered in her possession. Although despite my order she was not charged for this. Ivy stated I believe “ I was just having a joke with my friend”.
As the vehicle was used in a crime, i.e. driven by somebody on a suspended license jason decided to lock pick the vehicle and take it to the impound during which he found two legal firearms and handed over to me to do fingerprints as whether Ivy who is a felon had possessed such firearms.
At this stage, Lillian came running out of the building pushing past Jason and entering the driving seat of the vehicle she was instructed to get out of the vehicle at once to which she refused. She started screaming about how probable cause had been violated but rather than having a adult conversation decided that she would simply drive. multiple deputies, attempted to stop her but she decided to instead ram them out of the way and do doughnuts around the car park in the process she ran over a deputy in order to try and escape before pinning herself against the wall
She was forcibly arrested and removed from the vehicle.
it is of our opinion as as the vehicle was used in a crime by Ivy who had keys to the vehicle and therefore permission from the owner and was seen on body cam Shorty prior to arrival committing the offence the vehicle was subjected to impound. In addition to this IV was confirmed to have a Illegal items in her possession. I cannot confirm if the person in the trunk was Lillian but if so, this would only further support our actions as she is complicit in the offence. Perhaps holt can confirm.
Had Lillian decided to have an adult conversation with us about the situation she disagreed with rather than get into the driver seat of a vehicle against the law-enforcement orders and cause damage to department vehicles and run over one of our employees. The outcome of this situation would have been drastically different. It is likely she would not have received any charge or firearm suspensions. Applying the principle of the reasonable person Lillian acted in a way far removed from this even moreso with her being I believe an ex law enforcement officer
Witness Affirmation
- I, Matthew handley, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,
matthew handley
Investigator II
Date: 24/jan/2025
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 -
[email protected]
[/list]
[/divbox]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 04 Apr 2026, 02:20
by Joseph Horton
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 06 Apr 2026, 21:35
by Audrey Hartwell
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 06 of April, 2026.
I, Audrey Hartwell, a Private Defense Attorney with Rockford Law, will be representing the Defendant(s), Name in the underlying case.
I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel/Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.
Managing Partner
Rockford Law
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 08 Apr 2026, 09:41
by Audrey Hartwell
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION TO SUPPRESS
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 8th of April, 2026.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;
- Exhibit #: Exhibit #1
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
Entire Arrest Report
- Detailed Reasoning: The Arrest Report provided by the prosecution is completely unrelated to this case. My client is appealing charges placed 19/APR/2025, yet this Arrest Report is dated 17/JAN/2025 and is regarding an entirely different case.
- Exhibit #: Exhibit #2
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
Witness statement - Investigator Matthew Handley - Entire Exhibit
- Detailed Reasoning: Same reasoning as above. The prosecution has failed to provide evidence relevant to this case, and has instead provided evidence and exhibits completely irrelevant to this case.
Managing Partner
Rockford Law
377-1669 — [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 08 Apr 2026, 12:59
by Rowin Lawson
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 8th day of April, 2026.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"
|
MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
-
Full Name: Lilliana Howell
Phone Number: 4857557
Licenses Suspended: No
Officers Involved:
- Police Captain III Jason Steel
- Police Detective I Grace Steel
- Police Officer II Max Finnegan
- Police Officer III Mick Wegman
Charges:
- WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
- WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
- Incident Date: 18/APR/2025
Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
- Officer Jayson Powell operating under the callsign 3-U-13, responded to a backup call from 3-K-22 who detained two Souls affiliated members for an investigation of an open BOLO and required additional units on scene. While the units were handling the scene, A white Itali GTO Stinger TT with gold stripe, LP: 1NVTAA0G belonging to Lilliana Howell, full stopped in the middle of the road, next to the incident, blocking an incoming traffic. Her vehicle was pulled over and Lilliana was asked to step out of the vehicle due to her suspicious behavior and prior charges. She started making up reasons as to why she couldn't leave the vehicle and a K9 was called to the scene. During the procedure, dog Axel sniffed the vehicle and seemed to have an interest in the passenger seat area, possibly in the glovebox. The vehicle was searched and an AP Pistol with an extended clip was found. Therefore, Lilliana Howell was charged accordingly and transported to the BollinBroke facility to start her sentence.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
-
Illegal Possessions:
Exhibit A: AP Pistol
Exhibit B: Extended Clip
Legal Possessions:
Exhibit A: GPS
Exhibit B: Radio
Exhibit C: Knife
Exhibit D: Knuckle Dusters
Exhibit E: Gold Tags
Exhibit F: 2X Gloves
Exhibit G: Biker Helmet
Exhibit H: Clothing
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Incident Date: 18/APR/2025
Witness Information
- Name: Jayson Powell
Date of Birth: 15/JAN/1992
Phone Number: 395-2051
Occupation: Police Officer III, Los Santos Police Department
Witness Statement
- Hey there, I pretty much included all the details in my arrest report but I'll go through it again with as many details as possible.
I, Officer Jayson Powell, operated under the callsign 3-U-13 and responded to a backup call from 3-K-22, Detective Shadow, who detained two souls affiliated members for an investigation for an open BOLO and required additional units to the scene. While the scene was being handled, a white Itali GTO Stinger TT with gold stripe, LP: 1NVTAA0G, belonging to Lilliana Howell, stopped completely in the middle of the road, paying zero attention to incoming traffic, just to check up on the situation and on her gang-affiliated friends. Therefore, I decided to pull her over, a traffic stop was called over and due to her suspicious behavior and prior charges, she was asked to step out of the vehicle for the safety of the units on scene. She started making up reasons as to why she couldn't leave the vehicle and a K9 was called to the scene. The dog (Axel) had an interest in the passenger seat near the glovebox, where the vehicle was searched and an AP Pistol with an extended clip was found. She was then charged accordingly and transported to BollinBroke to start her sentence.
*Bodycam from the incident would be included*
Witness Affirmation
- I, Jayson Powell, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,
Jayson Powell,
Police Officer III
Los Santos Police Department
Date: 02/MAY/2025
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 -
[email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 08 Apr 2026, 13:00
by Rowin Lawson
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 10 Apr 2026, 20:02
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A decision was reached in the above case on the 10th day of April, 2026.
The Court will accept the Motion to Suppress of the first Motion for Discovery given the stated error.
The Court understands the high workload the Prosecution office is facing and is grateful for the prompt resolution.
Parties, please file any further motions within the next seven (7) days, the Court will look to begin scheduling the Motions hearing after this time is up.
So Ordered,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 19 Apr 2026, 23:18
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF SCHEDULING
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 19th day of April, 2026.
All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a Motions Hearing on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.
In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time for the Motions Hearing take place and post a Notice of Motions Hearing informing all of the upcoming proceeding.
In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.
Respectfully,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 25 Apr 2026, 22:12
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF SCHEDULED DATE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
#26-CM-0006
A Motions Hearing date was set on the above case on the 25th day of April, 2026.
In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling application, this Motions Hearing shall take place at 17:00 on 27th day of April, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.
Both parties are ordered to be present in the Courtroom no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the Motions Hearing, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.
So ordered,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Re: #26-CM-0006 State of San Andreas v. Lillliana Howell
Posted: 27 Apr 2026, 11:10
by Joseph Horton
