Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Swat Nixon
Defendant Phone: 216-4573
(( Defendant Discord: swatnixon ))
(( Defendant Timezone: gmt-6 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: SD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 15/04/2025 04:30
Charge(s):

• evading, going through toll wihtout paying, possession of class 2 firearm, possession of body armor, attempted murder of government employee, unroadworthy vehicle

Narrative:
they cuffed and charged me of these crimes and never read me my rights

---

I, Swat Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Gathering evidence
  • Detailed Explanation: The Prosecution is still gathering evidence from the arresting department. To allow for a review before providing discovery on the docket, the Prosecution is requesting the Order for Discovery be extended with an additional four (4) days.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Prosecution,
  
  The court, by virtue of no response, has allowed more than the requested 4 day continuance. Can the prosecution articulate a reasoning as to why additional time would be needed? If not, the court may be forced to move towards dismissal.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Kant,
  
  Apologies for not responding in a timely manner with our requested continuance. Due to a lack of response from staff members and the time taken to prepare for other trials, the discovery for this case was not finalized. It will be posted on the docket within the hour.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  234-9321 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Swat Nixon, 15/APR/2025

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Swat Nixon
    Telephone Number: 4902637
    Licenses Suspended: Yes
    • Driver
    
    Charges:
    • VF01 - Evading an Officer
    • VM09 - Operation of a Vehicle without a License Plate
    • SF02 - Attempted Murder of a Gov. employee
    • WM05 - Possession of Body Armor as a Felon
    • WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: Justin Adams
    Badge Number: 28498
    Callsign: 12-R-32

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2025-04-14
    Deputies Involved: Mason Ross, Ava Behr, Cliff Derringer, Hugo Hernandez, Robin Morrison, and JTAC 1 some PD.
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • I was attempting to pull over a green 10-F for not having a license plate, Upon pulling him over when I called out a 10-55, the suspect hopped out of his 10-F with a Special Carbine, and Body armor and started lighting it up. He then hopped back into his Car and started to evade. I called in shots fired and dropped a panic and Lieutenant Derringer called in JTAC 1 for the pursuit, he authorized to shoot and take tires on his vehicle. I got in the back of the pursuit line, but when PD joined they had AIR-1 on him, and they saw him switch into a pink Drag. He continued to evade intell falling off his bike, and getting gunned down, Deputy Behr treated him, and took the weapons off of him. I later then got the evidence putting it in his locker. MD got to the scene, and furthermore treated him. We brought him to lower pillbox, then to DOC without anymore issues.
      
      He is getting WF03 for having a special carbine
      He is getting WM05 for having body Armor as a felon
      He is getting SF02 Attemped murder of a gov for shooting me once in the knee.
      He is getting WM09 for committing a crime whilst not having a LP
      He is getting VF01 for evading after shooting me during the 10-55

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
    Exhibit A: Special Carbine 1660086898995
    Exhibit B: Body armor
    
    Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)

    

    ---

  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  Justin Adams
  

  ---

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Deputy Sheriff Justin Adams

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: [14/APR/2025]

  Witness Information

  • Name: [Justin Adams]
    Date of Birth: [03/FEB/1998]
    Phone Number: 2267094]
    Occupation: [Deputy Sheriff]

  Witness Statement

  • I was patrolling up north when a green vehicle didn't have a license plate, I attempted to do a normal traffic stop when the Driver later ID'ed as Swat Nixon, Jumped out with body armor and a heavy. He shot my tires, and the bullets hit me once in the knee. He fled and I called out on the radio shots fired. We took it to JTAC 1, and we got air, and a bunch of units on him. I did not see him again till he was on the ground getting treated by a deputy. He was already cuffed and searched, and I just waited for MD to come and treat him the rest. I took the arrest as I initiated the traffic stop. After we brought him to MD, he got to doc just fine.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Justin Adams, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    [Justin Adams]
    Deputy Sheriff
    
    Date: [04/25/2025]

  

• Exhibit #3: Dashcam footage - Unit 12-R-32, 15/APR/2025

  Footage

• Exhibit #4: Bodycam footage - Deputy Sheriff Justin Adams, 15/APR/2025

  Footage

• Exhibit #5: Witness statement - Lieutenant Cliff Derringer

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: [15/APR/2025]

  Witness Information

  • Name: [Cliff Derringer]
    Date of Birth: [SEP/1973]
    Phone Number: [476-1433]
    Occupation: [LSSD - Lieutenant]

  Witness Statement

  • I remember the deputy involved, Justin Adams called out that he was conducting 10-55 on the vehicle when he suddenly cried out that the suspect had gotten from his vehicle and opened fire on him immediately. I believe we did lose the initial suspect but AIR-1 picked him up switching vehicles onto his pink drag.
    
    Note, we were ORIGINALLY after this same Pink Drag from earlier, so switching back to the same target vehicle only doubled down our suspicions. He did eventually crash somewhere south of the Redwood Lights track where we engaged him in a firefight to the point of severe injury. Suspect matched the clothing/weaponry/traffic stop description and was charged for the attempted murder and possession in addition to other noted behaviors.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, [CLIFF DERRINGER], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    [Cliff Derringer]
    [Lt. / ACO Special Enforcement]
    [LSSD]
    
    Date: [25/APR/2025]

  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

---

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling/time-slot application, this trial shall take place at 11:30 PM on 12th of July, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

---

---

The main arguments raised in this case by the defense are around how the Sheriff's Department identified Mr. Nixon as the individual charged with the alleged crimes. The argument from the defense is that there was no clear footage or physical evidence indicating that Mr. Nixon was indeed the individual observed in Exhibit #3, but rather that Mr. Nixon was someone in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The prosecution reiterated the witness statements from the supporting evidence to the dashcameras, stating that an Airship maintained visual contact the entire time. The prosecution also highlighted the physical attributes of Mr. Nixon in comparison to the individual seen in Exhibit #3 opening fire towards the Sheriff's Department, along with the same form of weapon being found in his possession.

The Court finds that the Prosecution has met the burden of proof to suggest beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Nixon was indeed the individual seen in Exhibit #3, as the doubt being raised by the defense did not outweigh the physical and witness evidence provided to the Court.

In the matter of the charge of Attempted SF02 - Murder of a Government Employee, the Court finds that the actions of the defendant do not fit with this intended charge. The actions of Mr. Nixon did not show a concerted effort to attempt to murder the Deputy initiating the traffic stop, but rather an attempt to facilitate his escape.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of VF01 - Evading an Officer, I find the defendant Swat Nixon, guilty.
• On the count of VM09 - Operation of a Vehicle without a License Plate, I find the defendant Swat Nixon, guilty.
• On the count of WM05 - Possession of Body Armor as a Felon, I find the defendant Swat Nixon, guilty.
• On the count of WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm, I find the defendant Swat Nixon, guilty.
• On the count of SF02 - Attempted Murder of a Gov. employee, I find the defendant Swat Nixon, not guilty.

• On the count of WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Gov. Employee, I find the defendant Swat Nixon, guilty.

The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $2,250 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.


Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

On behalf of


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]