Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Johnny Willcott
Defendant Phone: 448-5933
(( Defendant Discord: Bullsevil ))
(( Defendant Timezone: CST ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 10/MAR/2025 01:01
Charge(s):

• GM19 Face concealment
• SF04 Kidnapping
• Accessory GF21 Prison break
• GM14 Obstructing justice
• WF03 Possession of class 2 firearm
• NM03 Unlawful assembly

Narrative:
I believe I have been wrongfully charged of these crimes and wish to fight them in court, I have had no knowledge of the incident that these come from.

---

I, Johnny Willcott, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Johnny Willcott is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Requested Venue: Formal trial
  • Detailed Explanation: The defendant is contesting serious charges that warrant a more extensive and in-depth examination in court than is possible in a bench trial. Additionally, the evidence collected against the defendant by the arresting department and the Prosecution amounts to such a volume that it cannot be comprehensively and satisfactorily presented and examined outside of a formal trial. Due to these circumstances, the Prosecution requests that the case be returned to the original format for a formal trial.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Thank you prosecution for your submission to the court. Defense, would you like to provide a response prior to the judge making a ruling? You will be given 14 days due to the LOA of the Chief Public defender, after which the court will be forced to make a decision.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Prosecution,
  
  As there has been no response from the defense, we are now turning it back over to you. Could please explain how you believe precedence could be set in the above case? If need be, you may send the information via email. If you cannot articulate accurately how this case could set precedence for the state, the case will remain a bench trial.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Kant,
  
  The Prosecution isn't necessarily seeking to set a precedent with this case, hence why it was not mentioned in the original motion requesting the venue to be changed. However, this case stems from an arrest following a situation that also resulted in the arrest and case of #25-BT-0071 State of San Andreas v. Theo Flee, which has been moved to a formal trial. The Prosecution is requesting that this case be heard in the same manner so as not to unfairly prejudice either case, with potential precedent being set in the Theo Flee case.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  234-9321 — [email protected]

---

---

While we acknowledge the prosecution’s concern regarding potential prejudice, it is important to note that each case is inherently distinct by virtue of involving a different defendant. Even if the circumstances or discovery materials overlap, the identity of the defendant introduces unique variables that must be weighed independently. While precedent may guide the court, it does not dictate the outcome; each matter must be considered on its own facts, evidence, and the individual before the court.

Without precedence being pursued the court will be denying the prosecutions request for a change in venue. We will be allotting 14 days for discovery due to the current staffing of the prosecution division.

So Ordered,


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Thank you defendant for notifying the court. We will now be accepting your plea of guilty and archiving the case. We appreciate the time spent on the case thus far.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]