Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Nellie Porter
Defendant Phone: 333-9852
(( Defendant Discord: strangebirde ))
(( Defendant Timezone: PST ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 07/Feb/2025 4:28
Charge(s):

• Manufacturing Drugs
• Face Concealment
• Providing False Information
• Unlawful Assembly

Narrative:
I, Nellie Porter, the defendant, believe I was wrongfully convicted of a crime and that my rights were violated. I respectfully request a review of my case and the opportunity to appeal this conviction. I am represented by defense attorney Finlay Mcculloch and paralegal Arnav Justice.

---

I, Nellie Porter, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Amend, the original charges with the underlined amended charges.

• Original Charges
  • DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance
  • NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
  • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer

• Amended Charges
  • Accessory to DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance
  • NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
  • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer

• Detailed Explanation: Based on a review of the evidence, the Prosecution believes that the charge of Accessory to DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance is more appropriate than the original charge of DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance.

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, name, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Requested Venue: Bench Trial
  • Detailed Explanation: Based on the quantity and nature of the evidence, the Prosecution believes this case is better suited for a bench trial.

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

---

• Defense,
  
  Do you have any objections to this motion? If not I will be approving the motion to change venue and activating this case.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 274-4300 - [email protected]

---

---

The court will be accepting the Motion for change of Venue. Defense were given ample time to raise objections and since none were made this will be moved to a bench trial.

Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]

---

---

The case of State of San Andreas v. Nellie Porter is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 7 days.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes to dispute more than just misdemeanor charges or desires a more in-depth examination of the case, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest Report - Nellie Porter, 07/FEB/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  MUGSHOT

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Nellie Porter
      Phone Number: 3339852
      Licenses Suspended: No
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Detective I Grace Steel
      • Police Captain II Jason Steel
      • Police Detective III Cyrus Carver
      • Police Captain II Samuel Martin
      • Police Detective III Zoey Deul
      • Police Officer III Skylar Deul
      • Police Detective III George Hill
      Charges:
      • DF05 - Manufacturing a Controlled Substance
      • NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
      • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Incident Date: 07/FEB/2025
      
      Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • Police Detective III Carver witnessed the suspect at a drug lab location along with multiple affiliates. A 10-66 was conducted along SD units on the suspect's vehicle and relative occupants and she was arrested according to the earlier events. Once at Mission Row, the suspect lied in multiple instances about possessing a glasses prescription, behaving erratically pretending not to see the surroundings, and actively disrupting a scene in which law enforcement officers were processing 7 other affiliates of Mrs Porter.
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Glasses
        Exhibit B: Gloves
        
        
        Legal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Knife
        Exhibit B: Crowbar
        Exhibit C: Pendant
        Exhibit D: Radio
        Exhibit E: Mask
        Exhibit F: Photo
        
        
        Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

        

  

• Exhibit #2:Witness Statement- Detective Cyrus Carver

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: State of San Andreas v. Nellie Porter
    Incident Date: 07/FEB/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Cyrus Carver
    Date of Birth: 16/AUG/1990
    Phone Number: 452-1940
    Occupation: Law Enforcement Officer

  Witness Statement

  • Detective Cyrus Carver was operating undercover, in plainclothes and masked. Detective Cyrus Carver witnessed multiple individuals including but not limited to Nellie Porter at the location of a drug manufacturing lab northeast of the Alamo Sea. Upon Detective Carver entering the area, all the suspects quickly mounted up into vehicles. Ricky Swartz started packing up the drugs that were cooking on the tables, quickly gathering materials and narcotics in a rush. He then ran into Nellie Porter's vehicle and they fled the scene. Detective Carver called out all the vehicles fleeing and a stop was performed on the Kamacho with Nellie Porter in it. A drag fled the scene and led half the officers on scene in a chase.
    
    Nellie Porter was uncompliant the entire arrest and lied multiple times about have a prescription for her glasses.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Cyrus Carver, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    Cyrus Carver
    Police Detective III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: [11/FEB/2025]

  

• 
  Junior Prosecutor
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  514-3247 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

---

---

I, Piper Johnson, a Lead Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the defendant, Nellie Porter in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Lead Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]

---

---

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #3: Glasses Prescription, Hera Onassis
  Spoiler

  
  

  GENERAL INFORMATION

  Issuing Employee: Hera Onassis
  Employee Rank: Head of AMU / Master-EMT
  Date: 05/MAR/2025
  Time: 01:07

  ENCOUNTER DETAILS

  Patient's name: Nellie Porter
  Prescription Summary: Nearsightedness
  Prescription Details:

  EYE	SPH	CYL	AXIS
  L	-2.00	-	-
  R	-2.00	-	-

  LIABILITY WAIVER

  I, Master-EMT Hera Onassis, hereby declare that I have filled out the above form and have issued the prescribed glasses prescription without falsifying any & all documentation.

Lead Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]

---

---

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, respectfully requests the issuance of a subpoena for the following documents and/or testimony:

• Documents/Information Requested: All available bodycam footage from law enforcement officers involved in the arrest and search of Nellie Porter, specifically:
  • Police Detective I Grace Steel
  • Police Captain II Jason Steel
  • Police Detective III Cyrus Carver
  • Police Captain II Samuel Martin
  • Police Detective III Zoey Deul
  • Police Officer III Skylar Deul
  • Police Detective III George Hill
    
    • Purpose/Reasoning for Subpoena: The requested bodycam footage is necessary to provide a complete and objective account of the events leading up to and during Ms. Porter's arrest, ensuring that she is judged on the basis of her own actions, not assumptions about her location in the proximity of the drug lab. The purpose of this subpoena is to ensure that all relevant evidence is reviewed. The recording is essential to evaluate whether law enforcement officers lawfully conducted the search, gave appropriate instructions, and properly distinguished Ms. Porter's behavior from that of others at the scene. Without access to this footage, defense can not properly challenge the general allegations made in the arrest report, risking violating our defendants due process rights under the 5th Amendment.
  
  
  
  Lead Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 480-1442 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Sayaka Yukimura and pertaining parties,
  
  In a preemptive action to the issuance of the above subpoena, the Prosecution has made a second inquiry with the arresting department regarding the availability of bodycam footage from the mentioned officers. Following a review, no available footage has been found
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Junior Prosecutor
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  514-3247 — [email protected]

---

---

The court will be denying the subpoena request, as police bodycam should be requested via Motion to Compel Discovery. The court also notes the prosecution's notice that they were unable to obtain any bodycam in preparation, and as such while the defense is welcome to post the correct motion they should be prepared to move forward with the fact the body-camera footage is unfortunately corrupt at this point in time.

Furthermore, the court will be formally granting the prosecution's motion to amend charges as the defense has not objected and would reasonably not object to lesser charges.

Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

---

---

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;

• Requested Discovery: All available bodycam footage from the following officers involved in the arrest and search of Nellie Porter:
  • Police Detective I Grace Steel
    Police Captain II Jason Steel
    Police Detective III Cyrus Carver
    Police Captain II Samuel Martin
    Police Detective III Zoey Deul
    Police Officer III Skylar Deul
    Police Detective III George Hill
  
  
  • Detailed Reasoning: The requested bodycam footage is necessary to provide a complete and objective account of the events leading up to and during Ms. Porter's arrest, ensuring she is judged on the basis of her own actions, not assumptions about her proximity to a drug lab. This evidence is critical to evaluating whether officers lawfully conducted the search, gave proper instructions, and accurately distinguished Ms. Porter’s behavior from others at the scene. Without this footage, the Defense cannot properly challenge broad or unsupported allegations in the arrest report, risking a violation of Ms. Porter's due process rights under the 5th Amendment.

Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Sayaka Yukimura and pertaining parties,
  
  The Defense respectfully notes that a Motion to Compel Discovery was filed on June 1st, 2025, and as of today, June 11th, 2025, no response has been filed by the Prosecution. Under standard court procedure, a response would typically be expected within seven (7) days unless otherwise instructed.
  
  The Defense wishes to clarify where we currently stand and respectfully asks the Prosecution to file a Motion for Continuance should they require additional time to respond.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Lead Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 480-1442 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Sayaka Yukimura and pertaining parties,
  
  The record shall show that the Defense's motion was never granted and ordered by the Court, so there is no legal obligation to comply with the request. Notwithstanding, and assuming quite hypothetically that such a motion had been granted, the Prosecution would again assert that the evidence sought, to wit: body-worn video from the officers involved, is unavailable.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Junior Prosecutor
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  514-3247 — [email protected]

---

---

The Court has come to a decision in regards to the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by the defense on the 1st day of June, 2025.

While the Court has no issue with the Motion to Compel Evidence, we do recognise the prior responses from the Prosecution stating the evidence is unavailable. With that in mind, the Court does not wish to unduly burden the Prosecution with attempting to retrieve the evidence they have already stated is unavailable.

Given that all matters on the docket are now formally responded to, the Court would like to see this case be scheduled.

This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.

Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.


So Ordered,


Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

On behalf of


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

---

Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be accepting the plea of guilty from the defendant. The defendant was given ample time to interact with the courts and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As little to no contact has been made with the courts in the past 3-4 weeks, this case will now be archived and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.

Respectfully,


Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]