Date & Time of Incident(s): 10/JAN/2025 23:50 Charge(s):
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
NM06 - Trespassing of a Gov. Employee
GF21 - Prison Break
GF05 - Extortion of a Gov. Employee
GF11 - Grand Theft Auto of a Gov. Employee
GF14 - False Impersonation of a Gov. Employee
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. Employee
SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
GF10 - Grand Theft of a Gov. Employee
GM25 - Possession/Unlawful Use of Government Equipment
NM08 - Abuse of Government Public Safety Radio Frequencies or Hotlines
Narrative:
I have been charged with the prison break of Sophia Falcone, to which I was not involved.
I, Cortez Rivera, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Re: State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 20 Jan 2025, 04:14
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 20th day of January, 2025.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.
The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 27 Apr 2025, 03:44
by Sayaka Yukimura
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-BT-0048
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 26 May 2025, 20:44
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-BT-0048
A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 26th of May, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
Reasoning: Preparing evidence for multi-defendant case
Detailed Explanation: This case is one (1) of five (5) cases regarding the same incident. Despite the time lapsed since the filing of these cases, the Prosecution is still undergoing efforts with the Sheriff's Department in having the evidence made available to the Prosecution for review, efforts which were discovered to be more complicated than expected due to the sensitivity of the material, maintaining a proper chain of custody, and other technical difficulties. On these grounds, the Prosecution is requesting a continuance of fourteen (14) days on the Order for Discovery.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 07:15
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution,
The court has given you the time requested as there has been a lapse in response from the Judiciary. That being said, the court will be allowing an additional 7 days for the prosecution to compile the evidence. If evidence has not been provided, the court may move to dismiss the case due to a failure of the prosecution to present evidence within a reasonable amount of time.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 22 Jun 2025, 20:02
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution,
If you cannot provide a valid reasoning as to why there is such a delay providing the evidence, the courts will be forced to dismiss the case in favor of the defendant. You have 48 hours to provide a response. If you need to provide the response via email, please do so.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 24 Jun 2025, 22:48
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
The Prosecution has, regrettably, no update regarding potential evidence at this time. Despite multiple attempts of contact with the Los Santos Sheriff's Department over the course of the last six (6) months, the Prosecution has still not managed to establish access to the relevant evidence. As such, we have nothing to present at this time.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 25 Jun 2025, 02:21
by Alistair Vespucci
I look forward to my charges being dropped as my dear friend's Cortez and son's David were.
PD/SD/JB should avoid these types of witch-hunts in the future. Forced to drop charges against Carl Vespucci, Cortez, and David.
What a terrible look for the judicial branch. What an actual joke.
I look forward to meeting with the prosecution team to discuss the possibility of filing charges against those responsible for the fishing expedition and our following false imprisonment!
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 06 Jul 2025, 00:49
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-BT-0048
A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of July, 2025.
After a discussion internally within the Judiciary, and then between the San Andreas Judicial Branch and the Los Santos Sheriffs Department, it was determined that delays and miscommunications occurred over multiple months on both sides of the fence. Despite the length of time that has occurred, the courts cannot deny the seriousness of the crimes, and the weight of a dismissal prior to established proper communication. We maintain that the rights of defendants to a speedy trial remain at the forefront of the mind of the Judiciary. However, a reasonable explanation has been provided by law enforcement and prosecution.
As the prosecution is now in possession of the necessary information to create a relevant Motion for Discovery, the courts will be allowing an additional 7 days, nothing more, for the prosecution to provide their evidence.
Respectfully,
Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 06 Jul 2025, 21:27
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-BT-0048
A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 6th of July, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;
Requested Venue: Formal trial
Detailed Explanation: This case warrants a formal trial due to its complexity. The defendant was arrested based on an investigation spanning several months, which also saw the arrest of multiple other co-conspirators and defendants. The Prosecution, during its case-in-chief, will present a large number of exhibits that are crucial in establishing the facts and ensuring a comprehensive presentation of evidence. The connection between this case and those of four (4) other defendants through a conspiracy necessitates that the judicial process be strict and structured to ensure a thorough and transparent pursuit of justice and fair consideration for all parties involved. The investigation behind the defendant's and their co-conspirators' arrests spanned several months and is underscored by the seriousness of the charges filed against the defendant, which include the state's most grave felonies, and demands a meticulous review of the extensive evidence. Proceeding with a formal trial will not only uphold the integrity of the judicial system through detailed trial proceedings, but it will also guarantee due process. Lastly, it will maintain public confidence in the justice system's ability to handle complex and high-stakes cases responsibly and impartially, which is especially important following the recent changes to the court system.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 06 Jul 2025, 23:10
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution and defense counsel,
The court formally recognises the motion from the prosecution for a change of venue. Defense, please provide a response within the next seven (7) days either with your arguments against this motion or your acceptance of the motion.
Respectfully,
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]
On behalf of
Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 07 Jul 2025, 00:41
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
The Prosecution would like to amend its previous motion to also consider the Prosecution's intent of setting precedent with regards to one- and two-party consent.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 22:37
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR JOINDER
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-BT-0048
A Motion for Joinder was filed in the above case on the 8th of July, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Joinder, requesting this and the following list of cases be joined together for collective prosecution.
Case information
#25-BT-0039, State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
case number and name
David Deltoid
defendant
David Deltoid (self-representation)
defense attorney
Case information
#25-BT-0040, State of San Andreas v. Nathaniel Luceran
case number and name
Nathaniel Luceran
defendant
Luna McMillan, Vanguard Law
defense attorney
Case information
State of San Andreas v. Carl Valentine
case number and name
Carl Valentine
defendant
Jay Wellberg, Assured Law
defense attorney
Case information
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
case number and name
Alistair Vespucci
defendant
Quentin Delaventura, Assured Law
defense attorney
Detailed Explanation: The four (4) listed cases are all the result of the same investigation into the August 18th prison break of Sophia Falcone, as is the defendant's. All five (5) defendants are alleged to have been part of the planning and execution of the prison break, all of them receiving many, and in some cases all, of the same charges as the other defendants. Consolidating these cases will minimize the duplication of efforts by prosecutors, witnesses, and resources, and thereby reduce judicial resources on trying five (5) near-identical cases, while also promoting judicial efficiency, consistency, and fairness. Due to the nature of the crimes, being interconnected and committed in concert, makes it logical to address their actions collectively. Trying the cases separately could potentially lead to inconsistent verdicts, thereby undermining the principles of fairness, for example, by allowing one defendant's testimony or evidence to influence the outcome of another. Joining the trials could prevent the defendants from presenting conflicting defenses that could be unfairly advantaged. Moreover, the defendants' coordinated actions and shared responsibilities in committing the alleged crimes make trying the cases separately redundant and potentially prejudicial to the other cases. Trying the cases together promotes the interests of justice with an equitable resolution for all parties involved.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 13 Jul 2025, 18:50
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
To all parties concerned,
This notice is to show intent by the Prosecution to provide discovery once the previous motions have been ruled upon. The outcome of both motions will unquestionably and definitively alter the nature of and course of the trials to come. If requested by the Judiciary, the Prosecution can forward a preliminary discovery for review.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 14 Jul 2025, 18:29
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution and defense counsel,
Prosecution, the court has recognized and acknowledged the motions presented. We understand the need for a response from defense prior to posting the motion for discovery. In the meantime, the Judiciary is requesting an informal motion for discovery be sent via email to myself. This is to solidify that procedures are being maintain and to ensure that, if the defense requests it, the case would be ready for bench trial as soon as possible.
Defense, you now have 14 days, due to the current LOA of the Chief Public Defender, to provide your response to the states motion or the court will be force to make a ruling based on the given information.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 28 Jul 2025, 20:25
by Daniel Carmello
San Andreas Judicial Branch Public Defense Division "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
Honorable Judge Kant and Pertaining Parties,
The defense has no objections to either of the motions placed.
Very Respectfully,
Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 313 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 03 Aug 2025, 14:33
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
A decision was reached in the above case on the 3rd day of August, 2025.
The court will be granting the prosecutions/defenses request to hear this as a Formal Criminal Trial. We are rescinding the order for discovery due to the transition of this case from bench trial to formal criminal trial. As such both parties will be notified when they are ordered to provide any evidence to the court via a new Order for Discovery and set timeline for progress. The court thanks all parties for their patience in this matter.
At this time the court feels it imperative to give notice to the defendant on this case. As there is a limited availability and number of public defenders, we encourage those who can afford it to reach out to any private attorney for representation. It will be the responsibility of the defendant to retain representation privately or remain patient until a public defender becomes available.
Respectfully,
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0048 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 10 Aug 2025, 04:18
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Personal Email "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
All concerned parties,
Let this notice reflect that I, Superior Court Judge Hugh R. Allgood, will be assuming the role of Presiding Judge on this case. In the interest of judicial efficiency, I will also be presiding over the other 3 associated cases; State of San Andreas V. Nathaniel Luceran, State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci, and State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
As this case was already ruled to be heard as a formal trial, this case is being hereby assigned a case 25-CM-0038, and an order for discovery will follow this notice.
After review of the motions that have been filed in this matter, the motion for joinder has yet to be ruled on. Although the Defense in this matter did not object to the motion for joinder, this Court will be following up with consistent rulings on the other related cases and denying the motion for joinder. (it would not make sense to join this case with others, if not all of the other cases was not also being joined in).
Respectfully,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 10 Aug 2025, 04:27
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-CM-0038
A court order was entered in the above case on 10th of August, 2025
The case of #25-CM-0038, State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.
The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.
Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.
So ordered,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 15 Aug 2025, 21:35
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-CM-0038
A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 15th of August, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;
Reasoning: Extenuating circumstances
Detailed Explanation: The Prosecution's counsel has only just returned from an extended LOA due to an unexpected accident, and has not been able to work on the case since before its activation. Additionally, this case is one (1) of four (4) cases being tried for the same incident, with two (2) of the cases still pending a decision on a Motion for Change of Venue for a formal trial. These are nearly identical cases, with nearly identical evidence. Providing discovery on the active cases before a decision has been reached on the venue motions risks compromising the Prosecution's case with potential bias and unfair review of the case until they are all ready to receive discovery. As such, the Prosecution requests that discovery be put on hold until a decision has been reached in the other cases and they are all prepared to receive discovery.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 21 Aug 2025, 18:21
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-CM-0038
A decision was reached in the above case on the 21st day of August, 2025.
Consistent with the Court decision rendered in #25-CM-0034, State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci, and in line with all other associated cases, the Prosecution's motion is hereby granted. The Prosecution is ordered to provide discovery within the next 7 days, although the Court hopes it can be sooner.
Respectfully,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 28 Aug 2025, 21:29
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-CM-0038
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 28th of August, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
Full Name: Cortez Rivera Telephone Number: Redacted Licenses Suspended: No Charges:
WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
NM06 - Trespassing
VF04 - Felony Public Endangerment
GF21 - Prison Break
GF05 - Extortion of a Gov. employee
GF11 - Grand Theft Auto of a Gov. employee
GF14 - False Impersonation of a Gov. employee
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. employee
SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
GF10 - Grand Theft of a Gov. employee
GM25 - Possession/Unlawful use of Government Equipment
NM08 - Abuse of Government Public Safety Radio Frequencies or Hotlines
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
DEPUTY DETAILS
Full Name: Vincenzo Callas Badge Number: 17063 Callsign: 3-Z-10
INCIDENT DETAILS
Date of Arrest: 2025-01-11 Deputies Involved: James Valor, Cole Lawless, John Kemp, and more SIB
Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
He was arrested through the conclusion of casefile #187266.
Upon arresting him we found a Pistol .50 in the glovebox of his vehicle.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station Exhibit A: Pistol .50 with 45x ammo Serial number: 1734881882973; Exhibit B: 1x Suppressor Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)
* Solomon Cobb would have attached several files to this email, containing the raw unedited clips of what is found in this video. * The content of the footage would be the same, except there'd be no overlays, no sound effects and no pausing, zooming, cuts or edits.))
Exhibit #9 A/B: Phone records / Consent form
Under seal
Exhibit #10: Admission of Guilt
Under seal
Exhibit #11: 911 call log
Under seal
Exhibit #12: Arrest report
Under seal
Exhibit #13: MDC record
Under seal
Exhibit #14: Image - 10 Mirror Park Blvd.
Exhibit #15: Document - 10 Mirror Park Blvd. ownership record
Under seal
Exhibit #16 A/B: Records - Nathaniel Luceran phone records / Search warrant
San Andreas Judicial Branch SEARCH WARRANT "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
To:
The Los Santos Sheriffs Department operating within the State of San Andreas and their respective investigative and tactical divisions:
You are hereby directed to conduct a search of iFruit Phone Company for the following designated records:
Nathaniel Luceran's phone records from 12/AUG/2024 - 19/AUG/2024
[X] Any evidence of crimes in violation of the San Andreas Penal Law Article GM to SF, included but not limited to:
GF21 - Prison Break
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. Employee
You are directed to execute this warrant between the hours of:
[ ] 06:00 - 21:00
[X] 08:00 - 22:00 (Hours of Operation for the Bank of San Andreas)
[ ] Any time day or night.
A copy of this warrant may be kept from the owner of the phone to preserve the integrity of the investigation. The court requires a copy of all evidence seized to be submitted to the warrant application for internal archive.
This warrant is issued on 11/DEC/2024 and is effective for 7 days. Should an extension be required, please submit a notice no less than 12 hours prior to this warrant's expiration.
Respectfully, Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Exhibit #17 A/B: Alistair Vespucci phone records / Search warrant
A - Phone records
B - Search warrant
San Andreas Judicial Branch SEARCH WARRANT "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
To:
The Los Santos Sheriffs Department operating within the State of San Andreas and their respective investigative and tactical divisions:
You are hereby directed to conduct a search of iFruit Phone Company for the following designated records:
Alistair Vespucci's phone records from 05/AUG/2024 - 19/AUG/2024
[X] Any evidence of crimes in violation of the San Andreas Penal Law Article GM to SF, included but not limited to:
GF21 - Prison Break
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. Employee
You are directed to execute this warrant between the hours of:
[ ] 06:00 - 21:00
[X] 08:00 - 22:00 (Hours of Operation for the Bank of San Andreas)
[ ] Any time day or night.
A copy of this warrant may be kept from the owner of the phone to preserve the integrity of the investigation. The court requires a copy of all evidence seized to be submitted to the warrant application for internal archive.
This warrant is issued on 14/DEC/2024 and is effective for 7 days. Should an extension be required, please submit a notice no less than 12 hours prior to this warrant's expiration.
Respectfully, Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Exhibit #18 A/B: Bodycam footage
Under seal
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 05 Sep 2025, 22:51
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-CM-0038
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 5th of September, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
Exhibit #19: CCTV footage
UNDER SEAL
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 06 Sep 2025, 00:42
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
#25-CM-0038
Not seeing any Defense motions filed, the Court will begin attempts at scheduling in the near future. For the record, the three affiliated cases are pending motions hearings. Therefore, the Court anticipates waiting for these hearings to conclude before scheduling this for a trial.
Respectfully,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0038 State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 20:05
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Personal Email "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
To all interested parties,
The Court has been notified by Mr. Carmello that he intends to formally recuse himself from this case given his departure from the Public Defense division. The Court is currently exploring options for appointment of defense counsel for Mr. Rivera, unless Mr. Rivera is able to secure Counsel of their own or a decision is made to self-represent.
While the Court aims to secure counsel, the Court would appreciate the Defendant to notify such Court of their wishes.
Respectfully,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
