#25-CM-0040 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 11 Jan 2025, 03:17
by David Vespucci
Defendant Name: David Vespucci Defendant Phone: 593-1338 (( Defendant Discord: .kujima )) (( Defendant Timezone: GMT )) Type of Representation (Pick one):Self-Representation
Charging Department: LSSD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 11/JAN/2024 Charge(s):
SF01 Domestic Terrorism
SF04 Kidnapping of a Gov
Accessory to GF11 Grand Theft Auto of a Gov
GF05 Extortion of a Gov
GF21 Prison Break
NM03 Unlawful Assembley
Narrative:
I was unlawfully arrested.
I, David Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Re: State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 16 Jan 2025, 00:02
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 16th day of January, 2025.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.
The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 26 Apr 2025, 23:44
by Sayaka Yukimura
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0039
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.
The case of State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 26 May 2025, 20:44
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0039
A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 26th of May, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
Reasoning: Preparing evidence for multi-defendant case
Detailed Explanation: This case is one (1) of five (5) cases regarding the same incident. Despite the time lapsed since the filing of these cases, the Prosecution is still undergoing efforts with the Sheriff's Department in having the evidence made available to the Prosecution for review, efforts which were discovered to be more complicated than expected due to the sensitivity of the material, maintaining a proper chain of custody, and other technical difficulties. On these grounds, the Prosecution is requesting a continuance of fourteen (14) days on the Order for Discovery.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 07:06
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution,
The court has given you the time requested as there has been a lapse in response from the Judiciary. That being said, the court will be allowing an additional 7 days for the prosecution to compile the evidence. If evidence has not been provided, the court may move to dismiss the case due to a failure of the prosecution to present evidence within a reasonable amount of time.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 22 Jun 2025, 19:55
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution,
If you cannot provide a valid reasoning as to why there is such a delay providing the evidence, the courts will be forced to dismiss the case in favor of the defendant. You have 48 hours to provide a response. If you need to provide the response via email, please do so.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 24 Jun 2025, 22:48
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
The Prosecution has, regrettably, no update regarding potential evidence at this time. Despite multiple attempts of contact with the Los Santos Sheriff's Department over the course of the last six (6) months, the Prosecution has still not managed to establish access to the relevant evidence. As such, we have nothing to present at this time.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 24 Jun 2025, 23:11
by David Vespucci
Diabolical. I request $100,000 from the government as this is a GREAT error in their judgement and I have been treated like a black guy in 1600s. Its 2025 people.
EDIT: On top of how much I'm getting already. I'm not stupid folk.
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 06 Jul 2025, 02:46
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0039
A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of July, 2025.
After a discussion internally within the Judiciary, and then between the San Andreas Judicial Branch and the Los Santos Sheriffs Department, it was determined that delays and miscommunications occurred over multiple months on both sides of the fence. Despite the length of time that has occurred, the courts cannot deny the seriousness of the crimes, and the weight of a dismissal prior to established proper communication. We maintain that the rights of defendants to a speedy trial remain at the forefront of the mind of the Judiciary. However, a reasonable explanation has been provided by law enforcement and prosecution.
As the prosecution is now in possession of the necessary information to create a relevant Motion for Discovery, the courts will be allowing an additional 7 days, nothing more, for the prosecution to provide their evidence.
Respectfully,
Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 06 Jul 2025, 21:27
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0039
A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 6th of July, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;
Requested Venue: Formal trial
Detailed Explanation: This case warrants a formal trial due to its complexity. The defendant was arrested based on an investigation spanning several months, which also saw the arrest of multiple other co-conspirators and defendants. The Prosecution, during its case-in-chief, will present a large number of exhibits that are crucial in establishing the facts and ensuring a comprehensive presentation of evidence. The connection between this case and those of four (4) other defendants through a conspiracy necessitates that the judicial process be strict and structured to ensure a thorough and transparent pursuit of justice and fair consideration for all parties involved. The investigation behind the defendant's and their co-conspirators' arrests spanned several months and is underscored by the seriousness of the charges filed against the defendant, which include the state's most grave felonies, and demands a meticulous review of the extensive evidence. Proceeding with a formal trial will not only uphold the integrity of the judicial system through detailed trial proceedings, but it will also guarantee due process. Lastly, it will maintain public confidence in the justice system's ability to handle complex and high-stakes cases responsibly and impartially, which is especially important following the recent changes to the court system.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 06 Jul 2025, 23:11
by Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution and defense counsel,
The court formally recognises the motion from the prosecution for a change of venue. Defense, please provide a response within the next seven (7) days either with your arguments against this motion or your acceptance of the motion.
Respectfully,
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]
On behalf of
Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 07 Jul 2025, 00:40
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
The Prosecution would like to amend its previous motion to also consider the Prosecution's intent of setting precedent with regards to one- and two-party consent.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 22:35
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR JOINDER
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0039
A Motion for Joinder was filed in the above case on the 8th of July, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Joinder, requesting this and the following list of cases be joined together for collective prosecution.
Case information
#25-BT-0040, State of San Andreas v. Nathaniel Luceran
case number and name
Nathaniel Luceran
defendant
Luna McMillan, Vanguard Law
defense attorney
Case information
State of San Andreas v. Carl Valentine
case number and name
Carl Valentine
defendant
Jay Wellberg, Assured Law
defense attorney
Case information
#25-BT-0048, State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera
case number and name
Cortez Rivera
defendant
Public Defender
defense attorney
Case information
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
case number and name
Alistair Vespucci
defendant
Quentin Delaventura, Assured Law
defense attorney
Detailed Explanation: The four (4) listed cases are all the result of the same investigation into the August 18th prison break of Sophia Falcone, as is the defendant's. All five (5) defendants are alleged to have been part of the planning and execution of the prison break, all of them receiving many, and in some cases all, of the same charges as the other defendants. Consolidating these cases will minimize the duplication of efforts by prosecutors, witnesses, and resources, and thereby reduce judicial resources on trying five (5) near-identical cases, while also promoting judicial efficiency, consistency, and fairness. Due to the nature of the crimes, being interconnected and committed in concert, makes it logical to address their actions collectively. Trying the cases separately could potentially lead to inconsistent verdicts, thereby undermining the principles of fairness, for example, by allowing one defendant's testimony or evidence to influence the outcome of another. Joining the trials could prevent the defendants from presenting conflicting defenses that could be unfairly advantaged. Moreover, the defendants' coordinated actions and shared responsibilities in committing the alleged crimes make trying the cases separately redundant and potentially prejudicial to the other cases. Trying the cases together promotes the interests of justice with an equitable resolution for all parties involved.
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 13 Jul 2025, 18:49
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
To all parties concerned,
This notice is to show intent by the Prosecution to provide discovery once the previous motions have been ruled upon. The outcome of both motions will unquestionably and definitively alter the nature of and course of the trials to come. If requested by the Judiciary, the Prosecution can forward a preliminary discovery for review.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 14 Jul 2025, 18:28
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution and defense counsel,
Prosecution, the court has recognized and acknowledged the motions presented. We understand the need for a response from defense prior to posting the motion for discovery. In the meantime, the Judiciary is requesting an informal motion for discovery be sent via email to myself. This is to solidify that procedures are being maintain and to ensure that, if the defense requests it, the case would be ready for bench trial as soon as possible.
Defense, you now have 7 days to provide your response to the states motion or the court will be force to make a ruling based on the given information.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 22 Jul 2025, 23:11
by David Vespucci
The defense contests that the motion is bullshit and that the case should be dropped since discovery has not been presented or has been intended to be presented. The prosecution has stated that the arresting department is literally ghosting them, that should definitely be a reason to drop my case.
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 27 Jul 2025, 16:09
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution and defense counsel,
We will be officially denying the request for Joinder on this case as the defendant has requested to keep them separate. That being said, we appreciate your time as this matter continues. The prosecution is on an approved LOA from 24/JUL/2025 - 03/AUG/2025. We will give them 3 days to provide discovery for the case upon their return.
Respectfully, Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 01 Aug 2025, 11:20
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Prosecution and defense counsel,
It has been brought to the attention of the Judiciary, that, while the motion for Joinder had been commented on by the defense, the motion for a change in venue had not. That being said, we are requesting the defense provide a response in the next 3 days or the courts will be forced to make a decision.
Respectfully, Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 03 Aug 2025, 18:17
by David Vespucci
rather not change venue this is chill ive already waited like years and got told there is no evidence.
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 10 Aug 2025, 04:19
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Personal Email "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
All concerned parties,
Let this notice reflect that I, Superior Court Judge Hugh R. Allgood, will be assuming the role of Presiding Judge on this case. In the interest of judicial efficiency, I will also be presiding over the other 3 associated cases; State of San Andreas V. Nathaniel Luceran, State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci, and State of San Andreas v. Cortez Rivera.
After review of the motions that have been filed in this matter, the motion for joinder was already denied by previous judiciary. The only remaining motion is for a change of venue, in which the defense has responded. As the Prosecution is responsible for this motion, the Court will be allotting 3 additional days for the Prosecution to provide any rebuttal they wish on their motion to change venue. The Court will review all arguments after that time, and will rule accordingly.
Respectfully,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 15 Aug 2025, 22:06
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Honorable Judge Allgood and pertaining parties,
As stated previously, the Prosecution intends to provide evidence to set a precedent regarding one- and two-party consent within the state. This precedent also has the potential to be extended by further touching on the use of undercover recording and the 'Declaration against interest'-exception to the hearsay rule.
Regards, Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-BT-0039 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 21 Aug 2025, 18:07
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0039
A decision was reached in the above case on the 21st day of August, 2025.
In line with other decisions made in the associated cases and the State's intent on seeking precedence, the motion for a Change of Venue has been granted. This case is hereby being reassigned to case # 25-CM-0040.
A motion for discovery follows.
Respectfully,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0040 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 21 Aug 2025, 18:09
by Hugh Allgood
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-CM-0040
A court order was entered in the above case on 21st of August, 2025
The case of #25-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.
The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.
Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.
So ordered,
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
235-6076 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0040 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 28 Aug 2025, 21:30
by Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-CM-0040
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 28th of August, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
Exhibit #1: Arrest report - David Vespucci, 11/JAN/2025
ARREST REPORT
MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
Full Name: David Vespucci Telephone Number: Redacted Licenses Suspended: No Charges:
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
GF21 - Prison Break
GF05 - Extortion of a Gov. employee
GF11 - Accessory to Grand Theft Auto of a Gov. employee
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. employee
SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
Suspect was arrested at MRPD.
VEHICLES INVOLVED
DEPUTY DETAILS
Full Name: Louise Hoffman Badge Number: 20109 Callsign: 3-X-21
Full Name: Cortez Rivera Telephone Number: Redacted Licenses Suspended: No Charges:
WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
NM06 - Trespassing
VF04 - Felony Public Endangerment
GF21 - Prison Break
GF05 - Extortion of a Gov. employee
GF11 - Grand Theft Auto of a Gov. employee
GF14 - False Impersonation of a Gov. employee
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. employee
SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
GF10 - Grand Theft of a Gov. employee
GM25 - Possession/Unlawful use of Government Equipment
NM08 - Abuse of Government Public Safety Radio Frequencies or Hotlines
Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
DEPUTY DETAILS
Full Name: Vincenzo Callas Badge Number: 17063 Callsign: 3-Z-10
INCIDENT DETAILS
Date of Arrest: 2025-01-11 Deputies Involved: James Valor, Cole Lawless, John Kemp, and more SIB
Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
He was arrested through the conclusion of casefile #187266.
Upon arresting him we found a Pistol .50 in the glovebox of his vehicle.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station Exhibit A: Pistol .50 with 45x ammo Serial number: 1734881882973; Exhibit B: 1x Suppressor Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
Vincenzo Callas
Exhibit #5: Witness statement
Under seal
Exhibit #6: Witness statement
Under seal
Exhibit #7: LifeInvader post - Cobb Blogg news report
* Solomon Cobb would have attached several files to this email, containing the raw unedited clips of what is found in this video. * The content of the footage would be the same, except there'd be no overlays, no sound effects and no pausing, zooming, cuts or edits.))
Exhibit #9 A/B: Phone records / Consent form
Under seal
Exhibit #10: Admission of Guilt
Under seal
Exhibit #11: 911 call log
Under seal
Exhibit #12: Arrest report
Under seal
Exhibit #13: MDC record
Under seal
Exhibit #14: Image - 10 Mirror Park Blvd.
Exhibit #15: Document - 10 Mirror Park Blvd. ownership record
Under seal
Exhibit #16 A/B: Records - Nathaniel Luceran phone records / Search warrant
San Andreas Judicial Branch SEARCH WARRANT "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
To:
The Los Santos Sheriffs Department operating within the State of San Andreas and their respective investigative and tactical divisions:
You are hereby directed to conduct a search of iFruit Phone Company for the following designated records:
Nathaniel Luceran's phone records from 12/AUG/2024 - 19/AUG/2024
[X] Any evidence of crimes in violation of the San Andreas Penal Law Article GM to SF, included but not limited to:
GF21 - Prison Break
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. Employee
You are directed to execute this warrant between the hours of:
[ ] 06:00 - 21:00
[X] 08:00 - 22:00 (Hours of Operation for the Bank of San Andreas)
[ ] Any time day or night.
A copy of this warrant may be kept from the owner of the phone to preserve the integrity of the investigation. The court requires a copy of all evidence seized to be submitted to the warrant application for internal archive.
This warrant is issued on 11/DEC/2024 and is effective for 7 days. Should an extension be required, please submit a notice no less than 12 hours prior to this warrant's expiration.
Respectfully, Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Exhibit #17 A/B: Alistair Vespucci phone records / Search warrant
A - Phone records
B - Search warrant
San Andreas Judicial Branch SEARCH WARRANT "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
To:
The Los Santos Sheriffs Department operating within the State of San Andreas and their respective investigative and tactical divisions:
You are hereby directed to conduct a search of iFruit Phone Company for the following designated records:
Alistair Vespucci's phone records from 05/AUG/2024 - 19/AUG/2024
[X] Any evidence of crimes in violation of the San Andreas Penal Law Article GM to SF, included but not limited to:
GF21 - Prison Break
SF04 - Kidnapping of a Gov. Employee
You are directed to execute this warrant between the hours of:
[ ] 06:00 - 21:00
[X] 08:00 - 22:00 (Hours of Operation for the Bank of San Andreas)
[ ] Any time day or night.
A copy of this warrant may be kept from the owner of the phone to preserve the integrity of the investigation. The court requires a copy of all evidence seized to be submitted to the warrant application for internal archive.
This warrant is issued on 14/DEC/2024 and is effective for 7 days. Should an extension be required, please submit a notice no less than 12 hours prior to this warrant's expiration.
Respectfully, Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]
Exhibit #18 A/B: Bodycam footage
Under seal
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0040 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
Posted: 01 Sep 2025, 00:16
by David Vespucci
Black Kids with Cancer & Aids Unaffiliated Court Case Court Notice 01/SEP/2025
To whom it may concern,
Representing myself in this case, I request 3 more days to post any motions since I was in belief I had an attorney.
With deep appreciation,
Reformed Convict
☏ 593-1338 Small Black Kids.. Big Hearts.. We fight for both!