Page 1 of 1
#25-CM-0001 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 08 Dec 2024, 00:23
by Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Name: Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 315-6876
(( Defendant Discord: steakhappy ))
(( Defendant Timezone: EST ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Charging Department: LSPD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 08/DEC/2024 00:00
Charge(s):
- Obstruction of Justice
- Failure to Comply
Narrative:
I was wrongfully charged.
I,
Alistair Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))
Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 10 Dec 2024, 21:43
by Maximilian Fitzgerald
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 10th day of December, 2024.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.
The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]
Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 10 Dec 2024, 21:43
by Maximilian Fitzgerald
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 10th day of December, 2024.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 7 days.
If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes to dispute more than just misdemeanor charges or desires a more in-depth examination of the case, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]
Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 11 Dec 2024, 00:18
by Veneris Kalashnikov
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 11th of December, 2024.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;
Jason Steel wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 05:43
Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"
|
MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
-
Full Name: Alistair Vespucci
Phone Number: 3156876
Licenses Suspended: No
Officers Involved:
Charges:
- GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
- GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
- Incident Date: 07/DEC/2024
Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
- Mr. Alistair Vespucci (hereinafter 'the suspect') was witnessed by Police Captain Jason Steel in the restricted area on Joshua Rd, in between two clearly marked law enforcement blockades with lights engaged. Police Captain Jason Steel approached the suspect with emergency lights on his departmental vehicle engaged and ordered him to vacate the area, towards the West and on the outside of the line of DOC vehicles providing scene security. The suspect refused to do so, stating that he is on public grounds; on or around the same time shots rang out from the heavily armed group. Captain Steel had to use force to detain the suspect who remained belligerent verbally towards peace officers.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
-
Illegal Possessions:
Legal Possessions:
Exhibit A: Clothing
Jason Steel wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 14:37
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Incident Date: 07/DEC/2024
Witness Information
- Name: Jason Steel
Date of Birth: 20/JUN/1991
Phone Number: 288 68 44
Occupation: Police Captain, Los Santos Police Department
Witness Statement
- Mr. Alistair Vespucci (hereinafter 'the suspect') was found to be within the restricted area on Joshua Rd alongside other individuals. After approaching the suspects with lights and sirens, at least some of them were cooperating with law enforcement but the suspect refused to do so on grounds of 'public street'. On the East and West of the suspect vehicles with lights and sirens clearly demarcated restricted access. Police Captain Jason Steel ordered the suspect to go West, on the other side of the 'line' of DOC vehicles providing the aforementioned scene security. The suspect refused to do so verbally, and further more, stationed himself on top of a motor vehicle that was also ordered to leave, therefore also impeding the vehicle from complying with the order safely.
The overall situation was that of a consortium of gangs being belligerent and unresponsive towards peace officers, and shots rang out in the Valley, rendering any population between the two zones unsafe, and a possible target for the gangs, and a possible unintentional casualty in cross fire. It was imperative for public safety that part of Joshua Rd. involved in the situation to be cleared out.
Below you will find a snapshot of the police blockades, the congregation of police vechicles and in the same context, I will describe the approximate location of the suspect.
With the aforementioned snapshot in mind, the suspect positioned himself approximately at the Westmost intersection of Marina Dr. with Joshua Rd, on the Joshua Rd side; clearly still within the area restricted by DOC vehicles.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Jason Steel, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,
Jason Steel
Police Captain
Los Santos Police Department
Date: 08/DEC/2024
Junior Prosecutor
San Andreas Judicial Branch
222-7759 —
[email protected]
Re: #25-CM-0001 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 04 Jan 2025, 21:40
by Maximilian Fitzgerald
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
ISSUANCE OF VERDICT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-CM-0001
A decision was reached in the above case on the 04th day of January, 2025.
Exhibit #1 outlines Mr. Vespucci's refusal to comply with a lawful order to vacate the area. His claim of being on "public grounds" does not negate the lawful command given by officers to leave a restricted, actively monitored scene. His actions, as described, demonstrate a clear failure to comply with a lawful command.
It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
- On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, guilty.
The basis of the charge of GM14 - Obstruction of Justice comes down to whether Mr. Vespucci interfered, delayed, or obstructed law enforcement officers doing their work. Whether or not the defendant was aware of the specific nature of what they were obstructing is not relevant to this charge. Obstruction charges focus on the act of interference itself, regardless of whether the individual knew the full details of the scene. The defendants actions to refuse to comply with orders to vacate and positioning himself the way he did hindered law enforcements ability to secure the scene.
A point raised during trial was that the defendant apparently was not aware of what was going on, however, Exhibit #2 shows the set up of 7 SADOC vehicles, 10+ LSPD/LSSD vehicles in a cluster, and 3 other LSPD/LSSD vehicles scattered around. The exact location of the defendant was contested, however statements made in Exhibits #1 and #3, as well as by the prosecution, and the defendant himself, paint the picture that the defendant was absolutely in the "general area" of the situation. The court believes that a situation with blockades, emergency lights, large law enforcement presence, would typically signal to any reasonable person that an official operation was in progress. These visible indicators should suffice to show the defendant should have reasonably known compliance was necessary.
It was established that the described context of potential danger (shots fired, gang activity), law enforcement's need to clear the area was critical and the defendants refusal to comply would still constitute obstruction as it hindered the officer's ability to manage the situation effectively, regardless of the defendants specific knowledge of the risks.
It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
- On the count of GM14 - Obstruction of Justice, I find the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, guilty.
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]
