Page 1 of 1
#25-CM-0027, State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 06 Nov 2024, 00:15
by Piper Johnson
Defendant Name: Salvador Rivera
Defendant Phone: 222-7338
(( Defendant Discord: stepslv ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT+2 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender - Piper Johnson
Charging Department: LSSD
Date & Time of Incident(s): 05/NOV/2024 20:43
Charge(s):
- VF01 - Evading an Officer (Felony $3000)
- GM04 - Resisting Arrest (Misdemeanor $2000)
- WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm (Felony $3000)
- WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications (Misdemeanor $1500)
Narrative:
On the evening of 5th November, Mr. Rivera was driving by the Braddocs on his BF 400 when he heard shots nearby.
As there was a serious shooting happening at that place our client tried to plan the easiest way to get out of there.
Someone shot his tire so our client started to run away from the place.
When he got out of that place Mr. Rivera saw two LSSD vehicles rolling in.
As our client was afraid of his life he continued driving away but his tire popped out.
When he got to the highway, "two or three Kamachos" were starting to block him in.
Under all the stress our client had from almost being killed at the Braddocs, he was in a state of confusion and proceeded driving.
While driving, Mr. Rivera thinks he heard something similar to a demand "stop driving or something would happen".
Mr. Rivera then calmed down a bit and stopped his vehicle.
Our client put his hands up so he wouldn't be shot at, but the Officers didn't care about that and tased him anyway causing him to fall unconscious.
Because of the attack Mr. Rivera doesn't remember anything that happened between the moment he got tased and when he got to the DOC.
Our client was not offered any form of medical treatment even though he was taken to DOC unconscious and was in a lot of pain.
LSSD Officers stated that our client had a Class 2 firearm on him even though the firearm was found in the bushes at the Braddocks and was not checked for fingerprints.
Mr. Rivera's clothes also weren't checked for any gunpowder residue to have any reason to charge him with a possession of a firearm.
That is why I believe Mr. Rivera was wrongfully charged.
I,
Piper Johnson, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 12 Nov 2024, 22:45
by Maximilian Fitzgerald
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 12th day of November, 2024.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.
The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 07 Feb 2025, 16:29
by Piper Johnson

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 7th day of February, 2025.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Requested Venue: Bench Trial
- Detailed Explanation: The defendant invokes their Sixth Amendment right to a public and speedy trial. Therefore, the defendant requests that the court hear this case as a bench trial to expedite the process.

Senior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected] 
Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 16 Feb 2025, 15:15
by Hope Kant
Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 16 Feb 2025, 20:04
by Terence Williams
Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 16 Feb 2025, 20:08
by Hope Kant
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 16th day of February, 2025.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 7 days.
If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes to dispute more than just misdemeanor charges or desires a more in-depth examination of the case, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 21 Feb 2025, 01:46
by Larin Tai

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the Day of Month, Year.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 01:18
by Sayaka Yukimura
Re: State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 17 Apr 2025, 22:45
by Hope Kant

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF TRIAL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Salvadore Rivera
A trial date was set on the above case on 17 of April, 2025.
In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 12:30 PM on Saturday, the 19th of April, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.
Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.
So ordered,

Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected] 
Re: #25-CM-0027, State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
Posted: 20 Apr 2025, 01:34
by Hope Kant

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
ISSUANCE OF VERDICT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Salvador Rivera
#25-CM-0027
A decision was reached in the above case on the 19th day of April, 2025.
Both parties agree in different ways that the defendant fled from law enforcement. Defense argues it was due to preservation of life of the defendant, prosecution argues it was knowingly and willingly committed. Given the defendant continued to flee from law enforcement officers on foot after initially fleeing in a vehicle, the court finds it reasonable to believe he was aware he was being followed by the pursuing law enforcement agency.
What the evidence and narrative of the defendant failed to factually establish is the control or possession of the gun and therefore the modifications.
Judith Mason wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 23:13
This court agrees that the concept of constructive possession is a novel one for the State of San Andreas, and therefore, deems it necessary to further define and clarify the requirements for an individual to be found in constructive possession of any form of property. Needless to say, constructive possession differs from actual possession in the sense that the property in question need not be directly in the possession or control of an individual, but rather, an individual have the knowledge of such property, have the intent to possess such property, and have the ability to possess such property at a certain point in time.
The court system recognizes the concept of constructive possession, however there were multiple individuals with guns in the area as noted by the shootout. The arrest report does not state that continuous visual of the defendant was maintained, that the defendant was seen entering a bush, or that they had established initial visual of the defendant possessing the gun.
It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
- On the count of GM04 - Resisting Arrest, I find the defendant, Salvador Rivera, guilty.
- On the count of VF01 - Evading an Officer, I find the defendant, Salvador Rivera, guilty.
- On the count of WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications, I find the defendant, Salvador Rivera, not guilty.
- On the count of WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm, I find the defendant, Salvador Rivera, not guilty.
The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $21,500 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected] 