Page 1 of 1
#25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 13 Sep 2024, 22:38
by Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Name: Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 315-6876
(( Defendant Discord: steakhappy))
(( Defendant Timezone: EST))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Charging Department: SAJB
Date & Time of Incident(s): 13/SEP/2024 22:20
Charge(s):
- Felony Contempt of Court
- Forgery
Narrative:
I was wrongfully charged.
I,
Alistair Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines.
(( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.
))

Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 28 Sep 2024, 14:19
by Antonio McFornell

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 28th of September, 2024.
The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.
During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.
The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected] 
Re: State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 14 Dec 2024, 00:12
by Hope Kant

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Appeals Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE APPEALS COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
Alistair Vespucci v. State of San Andreas
#24-AP-0009
A decision was reached in the above case on the 14th day of December, 2024.
The court was informed by the Justice who placed the charge that they are retiring from the legal profession. The Appeals Court requires that paperwork be submitted on the pertaining docket when an individual is charged with contempt of court. Unfortunately, no notice was filed by the assigned judge. Therefore the disputed charge of GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court will be removed from the record of the defendant due to a judiciary failure to follow proper procedure. Thank you to all involved for your patience.
The plaintiff should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $17,000 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.
So ordered,

Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 26 Apr 2025, 23:35
by Sayaka Yukimura
Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 20 May 2025, 21:40
by Terence Williams

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-BT-0036
A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 20th of May, 2025.
The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

Prosecutor Name: Terence Williams
Prosecutor Rank: Acting Attorney General
Defendant Name: Alistair Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 3156876
Date & Time: 12/SEP/2024 0128
Crimes Alleged:
- GF12 - Forgery or Counterfeiting of a Government Employee
- GF25 - Felony Contempt of Court
Narrative:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Plea Agreement - #24-CM-0062
Date: 13 Sep 2024 21:53
From: Terence Williams
To: Antonio McFornell
Antonio McFornell wrote: ↑13 Sep 2024, 21:44

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
- Attorney General Williams,
I am going through my pending work and I received this plea agreement from Alistair Vespucci. Particularly I am concerned because of two reasons:
1. The charges proposed and the new charges after the plea bargain seem distinctively different. Is it because the prosecution has very weak or little to no evidence?
2. Also, it is regular procedure for the Prosecution to present plea deals usually, since this is a prerogative that is afforded to the Office of the Attorney General. The other case is the defense presenting them, after they've been already signed by the Prosecution. However in this case Mr. Vespucci is self-representing. I would feel more comfortable if the e-mail/proposition came from you.
With this being said, could you perhaps fill me in a bit in regards to this plea agreement and how it came to be?
Best regards,

Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Alistair Vespucci wrote: ↑12 Sep 2024, 01:28
Your honor,
Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#24-CM-0062
Date Filed:
DD/MMM/YYYY
Violations:
VF01 - Evading an Officer
GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
State of San Andreas
v.
Alistair Vespucci
PLEA AGREEMENT
- Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
- Current Charges
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- Former Charges
The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
- Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- General Provisions
- The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
- Waiver of Rights
- It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.

Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
Alistair Vespucci
Alistair Vespucci
Defendant
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
REPLACE TEXT HERE
Honorable [Judge's Name]
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
- Case Number: Unsure
Incident Date: The events in question took place between the 11th and 13th of September, 2024.
Witness Information
- Name: Antonio McFornell
Occupation: Associate Justice, Supreme Court of San Andreas
Witness Statement
- On the 11th of September I received a signed plea deal from Alistair Vespucci's government e-mail, which you can find attached below:
Alistair Vespucci wrote: ↑12 Sep 2024, 01:28
Your honor,
Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#24-CM-0062
Date Filed:
DD/MMM/YYYY
Violations:
VF01 - Evading an Officer
GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
State of San Andreas
v.
Alistair Vespucci
PLEA AGREEMENT
- Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
- Current Charges
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- Former Charges
The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
- Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- General Provisions
- The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
- Waiver of Rights
- It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.

Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
Alistair Vespucci
Alistair Vespucci
Defendant
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
REPLACE TEXT HERE
Honorable [Judge's Name]
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY
I sat down on the 13th to process the plea agreement. It is procedure within the Judicial Branch that the prosecution reaches out to the judge to present the plea deal, given that plea agreements are within prosecutorial discretion. Since I received it from Mr. Vespucci, I forwarded it to Terry Williams as it had his alleged signature. Shortly after sending an e-mail to make sure everything was in order so that I could process the plea deal (find e-mail attached) and have some concerns answered. After that, Terry Williams reached out to me in person.
Antonio McFornell wrote: ↑13 Sep 2024, 21:44

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
- Attorney General Williams,
I am going through my pending work and I received this plea agreement from Alistair Vespucci. Particularly I am concerned because of two reasons:
1. The charges proposed and the new charges after the plea bargain seem distinctively different. Is it because the prosecution has very weak or little to no evidence?
2. Also, it is regular procedure for the Prosecution to present plea deals usually, since this is a prerogative that is afforded to the Office of the Attorney General. The other case is the defense presenting them, after they've been already signed by the Prosecution. However in this case Mr. Vespucci is self-representing. I would feel more comfortable if the e-mail/proposition came from you.
With this being said, could you perhaps fill me in a bit in regards to this plea agreement and how it came to be?
Best regards,

Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Alistair Vespucci wrote: ↑12 Sep 2024, 01:28
Your honor,
Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#24-CM-0062
Date Filed:
DD/MMM/YYYY
Violations:
VF01 - Evading an Officer
GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
State of San Andreas
v.
Alistair Vespucci
PLEA AGREEMENT
- Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
- Current Charges
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- Former Charges
The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
- Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- General Provisions
- The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
- Waiver of Rights
- It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.

Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
Alistair Vespucci
Alistair Vespucci
Defendant
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
REPLACE TEXT HERE
Honorable [Judge's Name]
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY
After meeting with me, Mr. Williams affirmed to me that the signature was not his and that it was forged as he did not fill a plea agreement of such nature. I requested him to also inform me of this through e-mail to keep a paper trail of such circumstance and later on proceeded to file the charges against Alistair Vespucci for forging the signature of AG Williams and then presenting it to the Court as an official document, not only lying in the process but also interfering with an ongoing case.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Antonio McFornell, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,

Antonio McFornell
Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
Date: 20/SEP/2024
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Plea Agreement - #24-CM-0062
Date: 13 Sep 2024 21:53
From:
Terence Williams
To: Antonio McFornell
Antonio McFornell wrote: ↑13 Sep 2024, 21:44

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
- Attorney General Williams,
I am going through my pending work and I received this plea agreement from Alistair Vespucci. Particularly I am concerned because of two reasons:
1. The charges proposed and the new charges after the plea bargain seem distinctively different. Is it because the prosecution has very weak or little to no evidence?
2. Also, it is regular procedure for the Prosecution to present plea deals usually, since this is a prerogative that is afforded to the Office of the Attorney General. The other case is the defense presenting them, after they've been already signed by the Prosecution. However in this case Mr. Vespucci is self-representing. I would feel more comfortable if the e-mail/proposition came from you.
With this being said, could you perhaps fill me in a bit in regards to this plea agreement and how it came to be?
Best regards,

Associate Justice
Supreme Court of San Andreas
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Alistair Vespucci wrote: ↑12 Sep 2024, 01:28
Your honor,
Find below a plea agreement that the prosecution and I were able to come to agreement on. God bless!
Document 1 | Filed DD/MMM/YYYY | Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS
Docket Number:
#24-CM-0062
Date Filed:
DD/MMM/YYYY
Violations:
VF01 - Evading an Officer
GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
State of San Andreas
v.
Alistair Vespucci
PLEA AGREEMENT
- Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci; Acting Attorney General Terence Williams and the defendant, Alistair Vespucci, representing himself, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
- Current Charges
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- Former Charges
The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- GM02 - Battery of a Gov. Employee
- Accessory to WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By) of a Gov. Employee
- VM02 - Operating a vehicle with a suspended license
- General Provisions
- The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
- Waiver of Rights
- It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.

Acting Attorney General Terence Williams
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
Alistair Vespucci
Alistair Vespucci
Defendant
Date Signed: 12/SEP/2024
REPLACE TEXT HERE
Honorable [Judge's Name]
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: DD/MMM/YYYY
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 —
[email protected]

Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 07:02
by Hope Kant
Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 22 Jun 2025, 19:50
by Hope Kant
Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 03 Jul 2025, 15:49
by Hope Kant
Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 09 Jul 2025, 04:02
by Daniel Carmello

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
#25-BT-0036
A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 8th of July, 2025.
The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;
- Reasoning: Traveling Defendant
- Detailed Explanation: The defendant is out of town for the next thirty (30) days. The defense asks that the court allow the defendant to return before continuing with this case.
Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 313 — [email protected] 
Re: #25-BT-0036 State of San Andreas v. Alistair Vespucci
Posted: 12 Jul 2025, 04:54
by Sayaka Yukimura