Eclipse Government

• Detailed Explanation: Despite multiple attempts to contact the defendant to schedule a meeting, the defense has not received any response. It has now been twenty (20) days since I first emailed the defendant, and the email remains unanswered. Due to lack of communication, I am compelled to involuntarily dismiss this case.

Exhibit #5: Witness statement - Herrman Wolff in its entirety.

• Detailed Reasoning:
  Herrman Wolff has a documented history of criminal conduct, including convictions for Felony Fraud, Misdemeanor Harassment, and Domestic Terrorism. These convictions demonstrate a pattern of dishonesty and unlawful behavior, rendering his testimony inherently unreliable.
  
  Wolff has a personal vendetta against the Defendant, as evidenced by his social media post on February 26, 2025, in which he stated, “You are directly half of the reason that I quit Weazel in the end. You should not be throwing stones in your glass house.” This statement reveals a clear bias, threat, and motive to fabricate testimony against the Defendant.
  
  Wolff’s history of severe mental health issues, including public breakdowns and suicidal ideation, further undermines his credibility. His instability raises serious questions about his ability to provide truthful and accurate testimony.
  
  Wolff’s witness statement was submitted nearly a year after the incident and months after the dashcam footage became publicly available. This delay provided Wolff with ample opportunity to fabricate his account to align with the footage.
  
  The statement contains numerous inconsistencies and exaggerations that contradict the dashcam footage and the Defendant’s account of the incident. For example, Wolff claims the Defendant admitted to intending to kill the suspects, which is not supported by the footage or the Defendant’s actions immediately following the incident (e.g., reporting the incident to the police).
  
  Wolff’s statement is highly prejudicial and inflammatory, as it accuses the Defendant of premeditated violence and vigilantism. These accusations are not supported by the evidence and would unfairly influence the Judge's perception of the Defendant.
  
  The inclusion of Wolff’s statement would confuse the issues and mislead the Judge, as it introduces unreliable and biased testimony that is irrelevant to the core question of whether the Defendant acted in self-defense.

• Detailed Reasoning: The arrest report references casefile #170724 as the basis for the charges but provides no details about the incident, the evidence collected, or the reasoning behind the charges. The Defendant respectfully requests that the prosecution be compelled to produce casefile #170724 to ensure a fair trial and to allow the defense to adequately prepare its case.

• Purpose/Reasoning for Subpoena: The armed robbery on February 21, 2024, involving Juan Dzefar and another individual, is part of a repeated pattern of violent crimes targeting Weazel News and its employees.
  
  This incident, in which the Defendant and several others were robbed at gunpoint under threat of death, demonstrates a history of dangerous and life-threatening situations at Weazel News.
  
  The requested documents will help establish that the Defendant’s actions on May 10th, 2024, were motivated by a reasonable fear for his safety and the safety of others, given the ongoing threats and violent incidents at the location.
  
  The Defendant’s actions on May 10th, 2024, were taken in response to a perceived imminent threat, consistent with the pattern of violent crimes at Weazel News.
  
  The armed robbery on February 21, 2024, provides context for the Defendant’s state of mind and his reasonable belief that he was in danger during the incident in question.
  
  The requested documents will help demonstrate that the Defendant’s response was proportionate and justified under the circumstances.

• Purpose/Reasoning for Subpoena: The incident on February 1, 2024, involving Terry Abdul, is part of a repeated pattern of violent crimes targeting Weazel News and its employees.
  
  During this incident, Terry Abdul was confronted by the Defendant and other Weazel staff while attempting to break into cars in the back parking lot. Abdul withdrew a firearm and shot the Defendant with a .50 caliber pistol, demonstrating the extreme danger posed by such individuals.
  
  The requested documents will help establish that the Defendant’s actions on May 10th, 2024, were motivated by a reasonable fear for his safety and the safety of others, given the ongoing threats and violent incidents at the location.
  
  The Defendant’s actions on May 10th, 2024, were taken in response to a perceived imminent threat, consistent with the pattern of violent crimes at Weazel News.
  
  The attempted murder on February 1, 2024, provides critical context for the Defendant’s state of mind and his reasonable belief that he was in danger during the incident in question.
  
  The requested documents will help demonstrate that the Defendant’s response was proportionate and justified under the circumstances.

• Detailed Explanation: The Defendant has recently taken over their own representation. This transition requires additional time to review the case file and evidence in detail, draft and file necessary motions, including subpoena requests, which are critical to the defense’s case, ensure that all legal arguments and procedural requirements are properly addressed.
  
  The Defendant is committed to ensuring a fair and just trial but requires reasonable time to prepare effectively. Rushing this process would compromise the Defendant’s ability to present a complete and robust defense, thereby infringing on their constitutional right to due process.