Page 1 of 1

#24-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

Posted: 13 May 2024, 00:01
by Evan Kim
Image
Image
Defendant Name: Moose Gray
Defendant Phone: 494-8146
Defendant Address: Integrity Way Apartments
(( Defendant Discord: itsmos ))
Requested Attorney: Any
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 13/MAY/2024 19:45
Charge(s):
  • SF07 - Bank Robbery
  • SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
Narrative:
On Sunday night, I witnessed a bank robbery at Alta, i stopped by to take pictures of the situation and exercise my first amendment right of free press, I stood approximately 700 meters away from the bank and stayed there through the whole situation just taking pictures. After I left the scene, 30 minutes later police showed up at Roadworks HQ where i went there to signup for the job, and they stopped me, searched me and arrested me.
I plead not guilty, i was never part of the bank robbery.



I, Moose Gray, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image

Re: State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

Posted: 14 May 2024, 02:15
by Antonio McFornell
Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Moose Grey

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 13th of May, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

The Superior Court notes that the defendant stated on their report that the incidents took place on the 5th of May, 2024. However, upon further review and based on the narrative provided, it is clear that the defendant is disputing SF07 - Bank Robbery & SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage, both applied on the 12th of May, 2024. In light of the substance over form principle, it is essential to consider the true nature of the events over their documented dates, and thus allow this filing albeit the mistaken date of events stated by the defendant.

Image
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image

Re: State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

Posted: 16 May 2024, 20:43
by Terence Williams
Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 16th of May, 2024.


I, Terence Williams, a Prosecuting Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Image
Terence Williams
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]
Image

Re: State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

Posted: 16 May 2024, 20:44
by Terence Williams
Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 16th of May, 2024.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, and the reasoning for request is as follows;


  • Reasoning: Charges dropped
    • Detailed Explanation: Following discussions, the Prosecution, in agreement with the Los Santos Police Department, has decided to drop the charges against the defendant, and as such request this case be dismissed with prejudice.


Image
Terence Williams
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]
Image

Re: State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

Posted: 22 Jun 2024, 18:41
by Antonio McFornell
Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray
#24-CM-0028

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 22nd day of June, 2024.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray hereby activated by this Court under #24-CM-0028.

Pursuant to the motion presented by the Prosecution, the defendant does not require representation in these proceedings and thus, the presiding Judge will proceed to publish their verdict.

So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image

Re: State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray

Posted: 22 Jun 2024, 18:43
by Antonio McFornell
Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray
#24-CM-0028

A decision was reached in the above case on the 22nd day of June, 2024.


The case of #24-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Moose Gray has been resolved.

A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal has been filed by the Prosecution and has been accepted by the court.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of SF07 - Bank Robbery, I find the defendant, Moose Gray, not guilty.
  • On the count of SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage, I find the defendant, Moose Gray, not guilty.

The defendant shall be entitled to compensation in the amount of $48,000 for the difference in fines paid and time served - this compensation along with an update of the defendant's record can be handled at Rockford Hills City Hall by a qualified official.

So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Image