Members of the court,
It is with my full hearted disappointment that I attest to you this petition as is my right as a citizen of the state.
Ms. Whitehorse has provided a disappointing, corrupted response to the self-initiated petition, and flagrantly attempts to manipulate the situation to her own benefit.
0. Truthfulness
Let it be known that everything I write here, I write with the full extent of my BAR license and clean record on the line. I do understand that Contempt of Court may be issued in times of falsehood. The facts written here are not false, and I do believe this truly.
1. Lack of accountability.
The Executive Branch has once again, shown zero interest in submitting themselves for any form of accountability. I may personally attest that Lewis Langley did actively threaten DOC personnel, issue charges directly against Herrmann Wolff with zero Judicial oversight, and consistently abuse his authority in disgusting overreach. Any form of government accountability, such as the Office of Inspector General has fallen flat and simply been used as a vessel to abuse authority. Arnold Rimmer did have sex with a woman while on duty, and high-ranking government officials are fully aware of this. Emily Whitehorse had promised a public review of the Judicial Branch by end of last year, and seems to opt for sandbox arguments instead.
I petition the Judicial Branch to review the constitution and its relation to the wellbeing of the people, and the overall structure of the government. Not only that, I petition that charges be issued. I understand the Branch may be fearful to do so, but individuals must justify their immunity was used within the confines of their duty. Threatening my friends, people I'd consider family is NOT a justified use of your immunity, Governor.
2. Rule via suppression and fear.
In my discussions with Warden Kourtney LaFleur she has openly admitted and attested that the only reason DOC does not make a stance against the government's repulsive oppression of not only her department and the citizenship, is that she is under the direct belief that she and anyone involved would be ousted and replaced.
And her reason for this is obvious. The treatment of Herrmann Wolf was the government putting a whistleblower on for display and to show the world what happens when you choose to retaliate. The government, specifically Mr. Langley actively intervened in the Felon Reformation Program Wolf efforts, even telling us as for his recent application to go as far as to not respond until 'he (Langley)'s decided'. Among many other examples, it is my firm belief that Langley frequently misuses his position and its abilities for personal gain.
I once again petition the Judicial Branch to use every tool in their arsenal to protect whistleblowers and intervene against government overreach.
3. Misplaced interests.
In the now complete lack of democratically elected officials, who is to represent the individual? No. This was never the intent. The Executive branch acts with their own interests at heart, as Governor Langley has made apparent and now Chief of Staff Whitehorse.
I petition that the shutdown of the LRC is unconstitutional and leaves the citizenship in a dangerous position where once again, no democratically elected individuals are eligible to fight for the so little freedoms we have come to enjoy.
4. First world and us.
I must thank Chief of Staff Whitehorse for her mention of "first world nations" and how they wouldn't allow this or that. I will cite a list of democratic nations, by which its literal definition, the State of San Andreas is not. This list is based off the following; https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/ The Economist places these with a "Democracy index" so I will list from highest to lowest, and then compare us to the lowest example under "flawed democracy".
I petition the Branch to review this and officially determine whether we are a democracy, if not, what type of government we are.
5. Executive branch issuing of charges
The Executive Branch should not be able to issue charges on their own accord, as Ms. Whitehorse would say this does not occur in ANY first world country. But, it seems they choose to pick and choose when to implement first world policies.
I petition that the Executive branch be permanently barred from issuing charges and should file a criminal complaint like any other agency.
6. The rights of the people.
Exercise your first amendment right people.
"The House shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but the state may impose reasonable limits to this freedom for public safety; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the Press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
I petition that the government has infringed this right flagrantly.
It is with my full hearted disappointment that I attest to you this petition as is my right as a citizen of the state.
Ms. Whitehorse has provided a disappointing, corrupted response to the self-initiated petition, and flagrantly attempts to manipulate the situation to her own benefit.
0. Truthfulness
Let it be known that everything I write here, I write with the full extent of my BAR license and clean record on the line. I do understand that Contempt of Court may be issued in times of falsehood. The facts written here are not false, and I do believe this truly.
1. Lack of accountability.
The Executive Branch has once again, shown zero interest in submitting themselves for any form of accountability. I may personally attest that Lewis Langley did actively threaten DOC personnel, issue charges directly against Herrmann Wolff with zero Judicial oversight, and consistently abuse his authority in disgusting overreach. Any form of government accountability, such as the Office of Inspector General has fallen flat and simply been used as a vessel to abuse authority. Arnold Rimmer did have sex with a woman while on duty, and high-ranking government officials are fully aware of this. Emily Whitehorse had promised a public review of the Judicial Branch by end of last year, and seems to opt for sandbox arguments instead.
I petition the Judicial Branch to review the constitution and its relation to the wellbeing of the people, and the overall structure of the government. Not only that, I petition that charges be issued. I understand the Branch may be fearful to do so, but individuals must justify their immunity was used within the confines of their duty. Threatening my friends, people I'd consider family is NOT a justified use of your immunity, Governor.
2. Rule via suppression and fear.
In my discussions with Warden Kourtney LaFleur she has openly admitted and attested that the only reason DOC does not make a stance against the government's repulsive oppression of not only her department and the citizenship, is that she is under the direct belief that she and anyone involved would be ousted and replaced.
And her reason for this is obvious. The treatment of Herrmann Wolf was the government putting a whistleblower on for display and to show the world what happens when you choose to retaliate. The government, specifically Mr. Langley actively intervened in the Felon Reformation Program Wolf efforts, even telling us as for his recent application to go as far as to not respond until 'he (Langley)'s decided'. Among many other examples, it is my firm belief that Langley frequently misuses his position and its abilities for personal gain.
I once again petition the Judicial Branch to use every tool in their arsenal to protect whistleblowers and intervene against government overreach.
3. Misplaced interests.
In the now complete lack of democratically elected officials, who is to represent the individual? No. This was never the intent. The Executive branch acts with their own interests at heart, as Governor Langley has made apparent and now Chief of Staff Whitehorse.
I petition that the shutdown of the LRC is unconstitutional and leaves the citizenship in a dangerous position where once again, no democratically elected individuals are eligible to fight for the so little freedoms we have come to enjoy.
4. First world and us.
I must thank Chief of Staff Whitehorse for her mention of "first world nations" and how they wouldn't allow this or that. I will cite a list of democratic nations, by which its literal definition, the State of San Andreas is not. This list is based off the following; https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/ The Economist places these with a "Democracy index" so I will list from highest to lowest, and then compare us to the lowest example under "flawed democracy".
- Norway
- New Zealand
- Iceland
- Sweden
- Finland
- Denmark
- Ireland
- Switzerland
- Netherlands
- Taiwan
- Luxembourg
- Germany
- Canada
- Uruguay
- Australia
- Japan
- Costa Rica
- Austria
- United Kingdom
- Greece
- Mauritius
- South Korea
- France
- Spain
- Chile
- Czech Republic
- Estonia
- Malta
- United States
- Israel
- Portugal
- Slovenia
- Botswana
- Italy
- Cape Verde
- Belgium
- Cyprus
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Malaysia
- Poland
- India
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Slovakia
- Jamaica
- East Timor
- South Africa
- Panama
- Suriname
- Hungary
- Brazil
- Montenegro
- Philippines
- Argentina
- Colombia
- Indonesia
- Namibia
- Croatia
- Mongolia
- Romania
- Dominican Republic
- Bulgaria
- Thailand
- Serbia
- Ghana
- Albania
- Guyana
- Moldova
- Singapore
- Sri Lanka
- Lesotho
- North Macedonia
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
I petition the Branch to review this and officially determine whether we are a democracy, if not, what type of government we are.
5. Executive branch issuing of charges
The Executive Branch should not be able to issue charges on their own accord, as Ms. Whitehorse would say this does not occur in ANY first world country. But, it seems they choose to pick and choose when to implement first world policies.
I petition that the Executive branch be permanently barred from issuing charges and should file a criminal complaint like any other agency.
6. The rights of the people.
Exercise your first amendment right people.
"The House shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but the state may impose reasonable limits to this freedom for public safety; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the Press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
I petition that the government has infringed this right flagrantly.
