Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Wraith Armani
Defendant Phone: 5823104
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: yowraith ))
Requested Attorney: Nick Hightown

Charging Department: Los Santos Sheriffs Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 07/04/2024 09:00
Charge(s):

• Possession of a Class 1 Firearm and Illegal Weapon modifications

Narrative:
On April 7th 2024 The Los Santos Sheriff's Department arrived to a undisclosed location and searched the following individuals. Manny Bing, Malcom Yip, Bobby Armani, Wraith Armani, Faiz Yip. They arrived on scene lights and sirens active in multiple vehicles. Out of all of the people searched 2 were charged. Manny Bing with the charges of Evading, Resisting Arrest, Criminal Use of illegal weapon modifications, Possession of a class 1 firearm, Faiz Yip was charged with Possession of a Class 1 firearm, Possession Cannabis, Failure to Pay fine, Criminal Use of illegal weapon modifications. The situation was unprofessional by the Los Santos Sheriff's Department and herby appeal against the charges under lack of probable cause.

---

I, Wraith Armani , hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  Your submission to the Superior Court of San Andreas has been received. It is currently unclear whether only the petitioner (Wraith Armani) would like to dispute the charges or if all those named within the submission document (Manny Bing, Malcom Yip, Bobby Armani, Faiz Yip) wish to dispute the charges as outlined in this initial posting.
  
  All those disputing charges will be required to reply to this message with a government website account of their own by filling out the following form provided below. The form will offer another opportunity to provide a narrative if needed and contains the required affirmation that the specified individual wishes to be a co-defendant of the case.
  Live Form

  
  

  Defendant Name: Firstname Lastname
  Defendant Phone: ###-####
  Defendant Address: HERE
  (( Defendant Discord: HERE ))

  

  Supplementary Narrative:
  HERE
  
  
  

  ---

  I, Firstname Lastname, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
  Formatting

  Code: Select all

  [img]https://i.imgur.com/hq6d7UW.png[/img]
  [img]https://i.imgur.com/6h9z9Jh.png[/img]
  [divbox=antiquewhite]
  [b]Defendant Name:[/b] Firstname Lastname
  [b]Defendant Phone:[/b] ###-####
  [b]Defendant Address:[/b] HERE
  [b][color=#0040FF](([/color] Defendant Discord:[/b] HERE [color=#0040FF][b]))[/b][/color]
  [/divbox]
  
  [img]https://i.imgur.com/wjDADzN.png[/img]
  [divbox=antiquewhite]
  [b]Supplementary Narrative:[/b]
  HERE
  
  
  
  [hr][/hr]
  I, [b]Firstname Lastname[/b], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. I affirm that I intend to be included as a co-defendant as indicated in the initial case submission. [b][color=#0000FF](([/color][/b] I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. [b][color=#0000FF]))[/color][/b]
  [/divbox]

  As will be indicated in the future Notice of Receipt: the defendants are further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

---

---

I, Terence Williams, a Prosecuting Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Terence Williams
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Mason and pertaining parties,
  
  The Prosecution would like to inquire as to whether or not the defendant(s) are still wishing to move forward with this case. It has been 50 days since Your Honours notice for the defendant(s) to submit if they are appealing the charges listed as a single individual or as a group. As such, we would like to know if there has been any contact between the SAJB Public Defense Division or a private law firm, and if the defendant(s) still wish to appeal their charges.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Junior Prosecuting Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. The other mentioned defendants were provided ample time to express their desire to appear as co-defendants and they did not do so. With that in mind, this case will be heard of State v. Armani.
Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

---

---

I, Terence Williams, Acting Attorney General of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

---

---

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Lapse of contact
  • Detailed Explanation: In correspondence between the Prosecution and Public Defense Division, the Defense confirmed they have not had any contact with the defendant since 08/JUL/2024, a total of 38 days. Due to this, the Prosecution is requesting the case be dismissed.

Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Mason and pertaining parties,
  
  The defendant has been in contact with the defense and still intends to appeal the charges.
  
  Regards,
  
  Public Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 2956979 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Mason and pertaining parties,
  
  While the Prosecution does not believe the Defense wishes to deceive the court, they have not provided any proof to show the defendant is engaging with their case, and requests that the Defense provide it.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Acting Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

---

---

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Wraith Armani is hereby activated by this Court under #24-CM-0071.

At this time the State has adequate representation, however, the Defendant is still seeking representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned and they inform the court they are ready to proceed.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

---

---

Defendant, Wraith Armani, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: The defendant has no charges pertaining to the narrative highlighted.
  • Detailed Explanation: Upon reviewing the case and the defendant's charges, it became clear to the defense that the situation explained does not align with the charges on Mr Armani's records. This is made further clear by the defendant explicitly mentioning the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department. My client had similar charges as mentioned in the initial incident but from a scenario with the LSPD 2 hours prior, unrelated, and not being contested here which was confirmed with the defendant. Therefore we wish this to be dismissed and have Mr. Bing and Mr. Yip contest their own charges for the situation should they wish to.

Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
☎ 1-000-000
✉ [email protected]

---

• Parties,
  
  While the motion is under review, the court requests that the prosecution provide their input towards the motion. We would like to know whether it is being contested or not. Thank you for your patience.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
  
  The Prosecution is somewhat concerned with the timing of the Defense's recent motion. The case has just recently been activated after being filed six (6) months ago, with a lot of work put into this case. Furthermore, the defendant has confirmed their desire to continue with this case twice on the docket and once to the Prosecution through their counsel. However, the Prosecution would not be opposed to the defendant dropping the case, though we request that the defendant be required to pay an amount in court fees for the time and resources spent on this case by both the Defense and Prosecution and, in turn, other cooperating departments.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

---

---

The defense's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal is hereby granted. The court might be inclined to waive the court fees typically associated with such cases. However, the defendant, who is not actually a defendant in this matter, made a specific attempt to circumvent an earlier dismissal request by the prosecution. Mr. Armani acknowledged the case by posting on the docket. At that point, the court believes that either the defense counsel, in conversation with Mr. Armani, or Mr. Armani himself, should have recognized the procedural issue.

According to Mr. Armani's narrative: 'On April 7, 2024, the Los Santos Sheriff's Department arrived at an undisclosed location and searched the following individuals: Manny Bing, Malcom Yip, Bobby Armani, Wraith Armani, and Faiz Yip. They arrived on the scene with lights and sirens active, using multiple vehicles.' However, Mr. Armani did not incur any charges from this interaction, indicating an attempt to file on behalf of other individuals without possessing a Bar License. Established precedent in multiple cases prohibits individuals without a Bar License from posting on the docket. Doing so may result in contempt of court charges.

While the court will not pursue additional charges against Mr. Armani at this time, we remind all parties to respect the time and effort put into each case and to file with proper intention. The disputed charges will remain on the record, and Mr. Armani is hereby fined $25,000 for wasting the time of the court and the Judicial Branch as a whole.

Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.

Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]